When there were 3 Popes

  • Thread starter Thread starter thinkandmull
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
DavidFilmer:
If, hypothetically, Martin V was an anti-pope, then wouldn’t any appointments he made to the college of cardinals be invalid?
Oops. I made a mistake.

Gregory was deposed by the Council of Constance, and Martin was appointed, but (for some reason) it took a long time for him to get to Rome. There was a two year interregnum, during which Gregory died. So Gregory was already dead when Martin was formally installed (though, technically, a person becomes Pope simply by accepting the appointment, provided he is already a Bishop).
 
Oops. I made a mistake.

Gregory was deposed by the Council of Constance, and Martin was appointed, but (for some reason) it took a long time for him to get to Rome. There was a two year interregnum, during which Gregory died. So Gregory was already dead when Martin was formally installed (though, technically, a person becomes Pope simply by accepting the appointment, provided he is already a Bishop).
Still, Martin would have been accepted by the world so he was Pope
 
We have the text of the Council. What session deposed him, and what were the terms of the deposition?
Session 41 (held November 8, 1417).

There are no “terms of the deposition” because an Ecumenical Council cannot actually depose a Pope in the first place, so no such “terms” are even possible. But the Council installed Martin-5 as Pope. That is an implicit (and effective) deposition.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top