B
Beaver
Guest
There are plenty of good men. We have try to enter but were reject because we were to orthodox.
There are plenty of good men. We have try to enter but were reject because we were to orthodox.
You know, that is actually a good point really and it doesn’t sound chauvanistic at all. When I was an alter server, I looked up to the priest and respected him. It is that “I wanna be like dad when I grow up” way of thinking. When you are serving at the alter you get that feeling like you are really helping out in a way that benefits the rest of the people and that can get the “vocations wheels” moving for many people though it may not be direct, it has an impact. It’d be near impossible to figue out, but I wonder what percentage of priest were alter servers and what percentage of alter servers actually became priest/religious?
- Something which could hit us later: girl altar servers. The faith has always been female territory, no matter how much modern liberals decry its patriarchal structure. Yes, the priesthood is all male. But think back to childhood: I was educated by nuns, my mother taught me my prayers and led me in nightly prayer. Also, look around at the current Mass-going demographic - lots of women, not too many men. It used to be that serving at the altar was a sort of male-niche. Catholicism has normally been marked by division of labor, which extended to liturgy as well. Boys had their distinctive way of participating/contributing when so much of the Faith was passed on by women. Now, without the distinctiveness, boys have lost interest. They are no longer interested in a service that was often a gateway to the priesthood.
Just wondering what is your take on the lack of vocations within the priesthood in the Western world. /QUOTE]
I read a quote by a bishop (Chaput maybe?) that said, “We don’t have a vocations problem, we have a hearing problem. God hasn’t stopped calling, men (in general) have stopped listening.” And of course how they’re raised has an impact on their openness to listening. —KCT
It isn’t just one issue that is the cause of the decline in seminarians and priests. Nor do I think that any of your options in the poll are a reflection of the true reasons behind the decline. I think that they are stereotyped, easy-to-latch-onto soundbytes that are based on peoples misconceptions, which is why I was so glad see the list that he compiled.
- Good bishops bring out more vocations just by strongly advocating the faith in their diocese.
- Societal bias against Catholic and priests.
- Small families and pressure to have grandchildren.
- Lack of Solid teaching from some pulpits.
- Some unsuitable seminaries.
- Lack of understanding of what priests truly do.
- Lack of spiritual development among young people.
- Refusal of some dioceses and orders to take older men.
- Cafeteria Catholics claiming to be good Catholics and let get away with it.
- Insufficient auxiliary bishops to permit the bishop to have more time (his plus his auxiliary bishops’) with his people.
I don’t think that it is a question of orthodoxy. Rather it is a matter of fidelity to the Church and love of the Church.Could it be that orthodox seminaries, schools and dioceses have 24 hour perpetual adoration as a result? Or areas that have perpetual 24 hour adoration are orthodox as a result?
Isn’t that what orthodoxy is? Fidelity and love to the truth of Catholicism?I don’t think that it is a question of orthodoxy. Rather it is a matter of fidelity to the Church and love of the Church.
As for what is driving the 24 hour adoration. I think that it truly is the Holy Spirit working in this diocese. People here are hungry for the truth. Maybe we have woken up here, more than the rest of the country, and realized that modernity and materialism aren’t the answers and that they aren’t going to make us happy.
We’re on the same page. I was including those in orthodoxy.In the strict sense of the word orthodox would be correct. But that isn’t what I wanted to say. Institutions can be orthodox while the people are spiritually dead. But it is the fact that the people posess this fidelity and charity that is the driving part of this revival of Catholic life here.
READ THE REST at www.latimes.com
You will need to sign up to register which is free.<<<<<<<<<<<<
That is exactly why the poll was done. It is what you hear out there. No depth to it at all. If you would’ve read my response to Stobie’s poll, you would’ve seen that I was very grateful for his (name removed by moderator)ut and MAYBE I should’ve consulted him first.T Nor do I think that any of your options in the poll are a reflection of the true reasons behind the decline. I think that they are stereotyped, easy-to-latch-onto soundbytes that are based on peoples misconceptions, which is why I was so glad see the list that he compiled.
.Code:
This is an excellent point.The reason why we lack vocations in the US is the Church. They don’t encourage vocations. They point to “selfish” reasons by lay people. What a cop-out!