Where can I find the Mormon teaching on Africans being fallen Angels?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cormaria
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Are you saying African American Parishioners can’t speak any of those languages or wouldn’t attend a Mass in Spanish, English and Latin?

Are you suggesting that they Speak another language? Maybe I’m wrong for picking up that infrence, but that is what it “sounded” like.
No, it SOUND like precisely what I asked: How many of your parisioners are black…or do they go to a different church?
 
A HA HA HA HA!
Relax.

For all you know I am a Negroid so don’t play that card on me.
I don’t particularly care if you are green with little purple spots. You accused ME of racism.As a result, I lost my temper and posted a response that I regret…and later edited. Not before you quoted the original, but hey…that’s what I get for not cooling down fast enough.
Maybe if we weren’t so defensive you would’ve picked up on that point ages ago through various posts. Maybe the Preisthood ban is a sensitive issue for me because of the fact I am “Black” “African American” or “Negroid”
Well, you ARE ‘negroid’ and have the same DNA as every other person of negroid descent out there, just as I have all the DNA of every Caucasion out there. It’s not an insult. It just is. As a result, I have more risk of gall bladder problems (yeah, got mine out awhile ago…) and my DNA makes me more likely to have diabetes. Not to mention skin cancer.

BECAUSE you are negroid, you are more at risk for high blood pressure, etc. It’s not a judgement of morality. It simply is. As an earlier poster stated, the four major groups of humanity are: caucasoid, negroid,mongoloid and australoid…(australoid? Did I get that right?) There is no moral judgement on any of that. It’s just a descriptor, like a language tree. English comes from Indo-European–and so does Welsh, Russian and Pashtu. That doesn’t mean that one is better than the other. It simply means that…while they all descend from the same mother language (proto-indo-european) they have developed different ways of saying things.

Being Caucasoid, I have different ways of expressing my genetics than you do. I’m pink with a lot of little brown spots (some of which, at my age, are more than 'little…") and red hair (OK, it’s only red anymore when I go for the L’oreal, but it USED to be red!) and blue eyes. Your complexion is more even, I’m certain…you probably have brown eyes and your hair is either very black, or black with dark red tones. Am I right? It doesn’t make any difference.

And before you get all huffy with me…you think you have had troubles because you are African American? TRY BEING THE WHITE HALF OF A MIXED MARRIAGE IN THE SEVENTIES AND EIGHTIES. So if I seem defensive to you, I have a right to it.
Lets all just relax before we start calling people “idiots” or “flaming idiots” for that matter. You may just put your foot in your mouth.
Not hardly…and I won’t call you an idiot again.

No matter what I am thinking privately.
 
Hello, black Catholic here. 👋

I am a life-long Catholic, and my parents are Catholic, and came from a country that is largely Hindu, due to the large east Indian population. I attended a major Catholic university, and have attended, and volunteered in, a large number of parishes.

My childhood parish was/is very diverse, with a substantial black population, a substantial hispanic population, a substantial white population, and a visible Asian population. There was a Spanish Mass, as well as a Creole Mass for the Haitian population. I attended the regular English Mass, which was representative of the town we lived in. It was literally a slice of the town. Our main parish priest was Indian (he’s still there). The nun I worked with while helping out with catechism classes was white. There was never an issue of race, and the thought never crossed my mind, nor did I ever think “wow, this is really diverse”, until now that I’m writing this. It was just how it was, and very “catholic”, as it should be.

People choose their parish for a number of reasons. A large percentage of Catholics in the USA are immigrants. Eastern Orthodox also experience this phenomenon. In immigration, people tend to go to places where their culture has decent representation, for a number of reasons. Therefore, in cities especially, it is not surprising to find parishes with a large Haitian population, a large Irish population, a large Mexican population, a large Ethiopian population, etc. In these sorts of parishes, there will usually be ceremonies in English, as well as the native language of the major population(s). Many times, they will also have cultural dances, feasts, and other activities tailored to the major population. There is nothing wrong with attending an American/Western type parish, and no one is discriminated. I certainly never experienced anything of the sort in my life as a black Catholic. All of the parishes I have attended have been very welcoming, and going to a 70+% white university was not a big deal, and I had a wonderful experience that I will never forget. Because the school was mostly white, the parish I attended (on campus) was mostly white, and again, no issue. I also attended another parish once in a while nearby, which was again mostly white (this was the sort of neighborhood the school is in), and every visitor, including myself, was warmly welcomed. I love being Catholic, and I love that there are so many types of people in our 1 billion member Church. I have never experienced discrimination in the Church, nor have I experienced or noticed self-segregation for some nefarious reason. As my parents are immigrants, I can understand the need to form cultural parishes, to maintain your cultural identity (and pass it on to your children), and even then, all are always welcome, and many types of people will come and see.

And not only are there cultural/immigrant parishes, as well as the typical American parish (usually one parish will simply cater to everyone), there are also the “particular churches”, such as the Ukrainian Catholic Church, the Ethiopian Catholic Church, Coptic Catholic Church (Egyptian), Melkite Catholic Church (Arabic), etc. In the parishes of these churches of the Catholic Church, you’ll not only find an “ethnic” parish, but they will also have liturgies specific to those churches, i.e. the Divine Liturgy. The Divine Liturgy in each of these churches will usually have some cultural peculiarities specific to that church, especially language and hymn style.
 
So we have this problem; if having a racist policy proves Mormonism to be wrong, then so is Catholicism. If a racist past does NOT prove Catholicism wrong, then it doesn’t prove Mormonism wrong, either. If Catholics want to criticize Mormonism, they have to do it some other way because in THIS way, they definately don’t hold the high ground.
For one who seems to be a fairly rational mormon, you seem obtuse. It has been pointed out by you that the Catholic Church has had alleged problems with racism in the past with regard to the treatment of Blacks and other native peoples etc ect. It has also been pointed out to you that these issues with the Catholic Church have not been issues of DOCTRINE, but of PRACTICE. Organised racism and the suppression of Blacks in the mormon organization up until 1978 was DOCTRINAL and a matter of practice. What part of that do you not understand? Aside from the inherent falsity of mormonism, that alone would make it wrong and it’s “prophets” false.
 
You aren’t paying attention to my arguments. I am not attempting to justify a racist policy in the Mormon church by pointing out the (incredibly worse) racism in the history of Catholicism. That’s called a tu quoque argument, and is considered a fallacy. Aracist policy is a racist policy no matter who points it out.

What I AM trying to get through everybody’s thick heads is this: Those who criticise the racist policy of Mormonism prior to 1978 (and it was racist, by definition) claim that this racism PROVES THAT MORMONISM IS WRONG.

Now there’s the rub. If a racist past proves that Mormonism is wrong, how much more does the racist past (and the more I learn about it, the worse it becomes…) of Catholicism prove IT to be wrong?

So we have this problem; if having a racist policy proves Mormonism to be wrong, then so is Catholicism. If a racist past does NOT prove Catholicism wrong, then it doesn’t prove Mormonism wrong, either. If Catholics want to criticize Mormonism, they have to do it some other way because in THIS way, they definately don’t hold the high ground.
Can you point us to any Doctrine of the Catholic church that forbade Blacks from fully particating in the faith?
 
I hope that Dianaiad gets to Roosevelt, Utah someday and can attend mass at the tiny Catholic parish there. They have a wonderful black priest from Ghana. He is deeply loved by his parish, but the Mormons in town call him “that ****** priest”. 😦
 
Hello everyone, as far as i am concerned you are all a bunch of racists.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top