Where does 36,000 denominations come from?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Catholic_Dude
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
michaelp:
Second, Evangelicals see themselves as carrying on the historic Church, and Roman Catholicism arising in the late middle-ages, so your assumptions are not valid.

Hope that you are doing well and thanks for joining,

Michael
Hey Mike,
Come off it…you guys can claim any blessed thing you want but the historical evidence is only there if you ignore all the writings of the ECF. You must figure that Miliardo just fell off the turnip truck last night (with less than 200 posts…) to feed him that one.:rolleyes:
Late middle ages my aching backside! And I suppose that you’re the new Pope? :rotfl: :rotfl:
 
Church Militant:
Hey Mike,
Come off it…you guys can claim any blessed thing you want but the historical evidence is only there if you ignore all the writings of the ECF. You must figure that Miliardo just fell off the turnip truck last night (with less than 200 posts…) to feed him that one.:rolleyes:
Late middle ages my aching backside! And I suppose that you’re the new Pope? :rotfl: :rotfl:
Heh, actually I’ve heard of that thing before, but I let it pass since I’m tired of the same thing said about it. I think they know by now which is the real Church, but they still continually ignore it, which is nothing we can about if they still blissfully go along their way.
 
40.png
michaelp:
This is silly. I could say, “If you want to know what my church believes, just look at the Bible.” It does not come down to what someone or something says, it is what you believe. This was Pete’s concern and is still valid. Evangelicals are only unified in confession of the five solas and the first three eccumenical creeds. But this does not mean that everyone who claims to be evangelical believes it. The difference is that we are unified based upon what Scripture says and this unity comes about willfully; it does not need some outside “authority” that produces your “unity.” Respectfully Michael, you don’t understand Pete’s concern which is valid. There are not many “true” Catholics who see things the way you do. They live all over the board. I have many who are in The Theology Program who don’t believe the way you do, interpreting history and the Magisterium different. Unity is based upon a confession of Jesus Christ as God and Savior. Catholics, Protestants, Eastern Orthodox, or any other tradition who truly calls upon the name of the Lord, no matter what name or title they exist under, are unified under one head, Jesus Christ.

You and I are part of the same Church being built by the Holy Spirit through proclaimation of the Gospel. I do hope one day you will understand that.

Again, if you want a better understanding of the unity that exists, see this book: amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0830832394/qid=1113605842/sr=8-1/ref=pd_csp_1/103-7683523-7499840?v=glance&s=books&n=507846

If you don’t, well I guess you will hold tight to your misunderstanding.

Michael
I sure can’t tell from the myriad of winds of doctrines blowing around you guys for the last 487 years and the constant badgering attacks from all your “brothers and sisters”.

One source…that’s it. One voice and all the dissenters can bloody well say anything they please but they don’t speak for the Vatican and they won’t, so get over it. They don’t speak for Catholics and their problems are theirs…not those of us that know what we believe and choose to obey. I could care less if there’s 38,000 n-C denoms out there or just 2, it’s still the same argumentative confused batch of bunk that they concocted in 1517 and that preachers like you have continued to feed to unquestioning multitudes for all that time.

There are not 38,000 Catholic denoms all claiming that theirs is the truth…and that’s the fact. Knock yourself out selling it to those who don’t look beyond your sources and evidences. I’ll never go back. Evangelicals? What good news? All I hear is a mob of Bible wavers telling me that theirs is the truth…and no agreement among them at all. No thanks.
Pax vobiscum,
http://pages.prodigy.net/rogerlori1/emoticons/AN878.gif
 
40.png
michaelp:
What is the matter with their being hundreds of Churches in Frisco. We have close to 100,000 people. Our church serves just 3500 of them. There are other churches serve as local arms also. We are in contact and communion with these churches in fulfilling the great commission in our areas. We help each other out, all existing under the banner of our evangelical confession. It is not a forced unity either.
So your church serves about 4% of the 100k people around? Have you ever heard of the Archbishops Catholic Appeal in the Portland Archdiocese Here? The work under the same banner too and they get a lot of stuff done, they have no problem raising the money or manpower. The thing I love about the CC helping eachother out is that its really helping itself out, not “eachother” because that implies a sense of separation. The way I hear it with prots is that anyone can pull out of the deal at any time because it is “not a forced unity”, when that should never be the case, there should be one mother Church and if anyone wants to have it their way, then the mother Church has the authority to send them away with their tail between their legs.
And we follow by the rules that Paul laid out to Timothy. I was ordained according to those rules.
This is a concept foreign to Prots, slapping you hands on someone doesnt equal valid ordination. Those people had to get their authority from somewhere. Thats why the father’s Blessing on his children is so important. It is a physical act of empowering his children the with graces he holds as a man blessed by God with such special gifts. The father’s Blessing is one of the oldest acts in the Bible, it was so important and yet modern day groups shrug it off as a “symbol”. A child cant go up to someone on the street and receive the father’s Blessing because that guy on the street is a nobody and doesnt have the authority as their father given to him by God. Ordination is not a graduation ceremony with cake and punch at the end. It is serious business, you nor I can ordain anyone we feel like ordaining. The few pages in Timothy and Titus dont give nearly the required amount of information and training one needs to be ordained, most of what they learned they learned first hand with authorized people like Paul standing right beside them.
I dont know if you realize what is happening in 1Tim1:
2 Unto Timothy, my own son in the faith: Grace, mercy, and peace, from God our Father and Jesus Christ our Lord. 3 As I besought thee to abide still at Ephesus, when I went into Macedonia, that thou mightest charge some that they teach no other doctrine,…
… 6 From which some having swerved have turned aside unto vain jangling; 7 Desiring to be teachers of the law; understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm…
…11 According to the glorious gospel of the blessed God, which was committed to my trust.
He is speaking directly to Timothy and not to us, the task of preserving the gospel was not committed to our trust, but to a few, like Paul. Then Paul indicates this trust is now being extended to Timothy, and not to every yahoo who picks up a Bible. He specifically says that the average joe picking up a Bible and teaching what they think it says is wrong.
 
40.png
michaelp:
I agree–unified in name is nothing. You look at the “Cafeteria Catholics” on the street and I look to this forum and see great disunity. What matters is pretty simple, “Who do you say that Christ is?” If He is God and savior, then you have more true unity with other Christians than any catechism or Pope can force you into.
A unified name is everything, thats why the Jews were the Jews and didnt go by different names for the same chosen people. Second of all it isnt as simple as you make it, words are nothing when at the end of the day if they go home and turn into each man for himself. Im not saying that Prots are way off base, they are closer to the truth of the Gospel than any other religion is.
Evangelicals are only unified in confession of the five solas and the first three eccumenical creeds.
Do you know how much happened between the solas and creeds? That is exactly why the evangelical position is so weak, its pick and chose and in the end there is a large chunk of the puzzle left incomplete. Chunks of writings, teachings, history, etc are all left out leaving each man to finish the puzzle as he himself sees fit. Its the same mentality that many prots have where it reduces down to the Bible fell out of the sky one day and here we are, instead of understanding how it came about and realizing how the truth prevails when properly guided through history, through good times and bad that history is key to understanding why you believe something now.
You and I are part of the same Church being built by the Holy Spirit through proclaimation of the Gospel.
There is truth to this, we both are out to proclaim the Gospel, however it isnt every man or church for themself. Also you need to realize that the word Church is singular, and that it is a physical entity and not a city in the clouds. In 1Tim3:15 it is called the pillar of Truth. There is only one truth but if we were to shop around prot churches we would find that there exist many contradicting versions of the Truth which is very wrong.
“Protestant” is not a good word to use in this context, since you are simply defining it as “non-Roman Catholic.” Evangelicals could come up with a term that describes all non-evangelicals, and then place you among the thousands that are non-evangelical and say that we are unified and you keep spintering.
The term Protestant in its simplest definition is someone who protests against what the original Church teaches. You dont need to define a term for non-evangelicals, one already exists those that protest the evangelical position are now called “ProtoEvangelicals” (it a joke, get it?). Its kind of hard to say that you are unified when you just claimed that you only accept a few points from a few councils, when we claim to keep all points of each council, see the difference. As for that book, you said he is a Calvinist AND Armenian. I dont see how he can be both there should be one name that works, unless you are talking about him being from the country Armenia and believe what Calvin said.
 
40.png
Pete2:
I’m not just talking about the media, I’m talking about actual people and what happens in their lives.
This happens everywhere, being a Christian is a hard task. Especially when those around you want to get you back on to the fast paced self-centered material world where you are the god of yourself.

The Church of England was basically founded on the fact that a king wanted to get a divorce, and the pope wouldn’t allow it, right? What about the hundereds of thousands…millions?.. of Catholics today who have gotten divorces without getting annulments. I know several personally, and they still call themselves Catholic and are listed as members of the Church by their parishes.
So you see for youself that one division can cause a landslide of problems which can become harder and harder to fix. The important point here is that everytime a Prot starts something like divorce and remarriage the lasting effects can be disasterous. Look at secondhand smoke, it doesnt discriminate who it targets and manages to seep into everything. It is hard to stop, but that doesnt mean that the Church gives the A-OK, right now some aspects of the Church are in damage control mode. The Church shuts one door letting in cold air and then the Prots open three more, you try to keep up. Protestantism at its very core is destructive.

Do you think that every Catholic out there uses NFP as their only method of birth control? That every Catholic waits until marriage to have sex? This isn’t Noah and the flood type stuff, this is everyday stuff that is pretty fundamental to what JPII preached about on a daily basis.
Notice key word here: POPE. The universal leader says what they are doing is wrong, but if you look at many prot groups the pastor gets scared and says he doesnt have the right to talk about what people are allowed to do.

I love the Church, and I am moved by it’s great history and direct connection to Jesus Christ. No question. I’m just a little annoyed at the superiority complex that’s going here on this website over everyone else. Or that apologists are “doing battle” and getting all angry and heated in their defense of the Church, just to win arguments. Does anyone remember Jesus acting like this??? It’s really un-Christ-like.
Its not a superiority complex, when your family gets attacked you do something. Prots have been chipping away at the Pillar of Truth for a long time, and It kept quiet. No more keeping quiet, a lot of these guys are like leeches, they find a host to suck the blood from and then they die off or find something else. In the end there is nothing to show for the Gospel, is this what Jesus wants? By the way Jesus lost His temper a few times, he didnt always have a smile on His face the way some might paint it for you in Prot paintings/sermons.
Also Here is a great quote of what Jesus said would happen:
Mat10:
16 Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as dovesWhat does that say to you? There are people out there who cause harm to the Body of Christ all the while acting as if they are doing good, even if they dont realize it that hardly excuses them.

Let’s try to work out our own problems as Catholics before we go around belittling other non-Catholic Christians.
Like I have said in other posts, its one thing to know where the problem is and concentrate your forces accordingly. Its a whole other issue when a few Catholice like the ones in these forums are stuck in a crossfire of cafeteria folk and Prots which causes confusion in the ranks and divides the army. I stand by the one true Church. Jesus stands by His Church.

Pete
 
Church Militant, you seem very angry and unhappy. Open up your heart, this is just a discussion.

Here is the point I’m trying to get across:

The people of the Church are deeply divided on a number of issues. You know this is true. Just because you don’t approve of periodicals that don’t support your views does not mean that they don’t exist. I saw a statistic on this website that 62% of American Catholics support change in the Church. In Europe, I’ll bet the number is at least as high.

I agree that the pope is very clear on his direction. But so what? If the majority of Catholics do not follow what the CCC says in their daily lives (birth control, sex before marriage, divorce, etc.), then the pope doesn’t have any real authority over them, does he?

So what’s the point of railing against Protestants for being so divisive? If so many Catholics are disrespecting Rome on a daily basis, then I’d say we’ve got our own problems to worry about?

Pete
 
40.png
Pete2:
Church Militant, you seem very angry and unhappy. Open up your heart, this is just a discussion.

Here is the point I’m trying to get across:

The people of the Church are deeply divided on a number of issues. You know this is true. Just because you don’t approve of periodicals that don’t support your views does not mean that they don’t exist. I saw a statistic on this website that 62% of American Catholics support change in the Church. In Europe, I’ll bet the number is at least as high.

I agree that the pope is very clear on his direction. But so what? If the majority of Catholics do not follow what the CCC says in their daily lives (birth control, sex before marriage, divorce, etc.), then the pope doesn’t have any real authority over them, does he?

So what’s the point of railing against Protestants for being so divisive? If so many Catholics are disrespecting Rome on a daily basis, then I’d say we’ve got our own problems to worry about?

Pete
Let’s not lose sight of a critical point – the Catholic Church is NOT what the laity vote for, or what individuals want it to be. The Church is the ultimate authority, and those who disagree with it must either reconcile themselves to the Magisterium, leave, or be hypocrites.

It is one thing to admit there are sinners and hypocrites in the Church, another to say the Church itself is in disarray.
 
40.png
Pete2:
… Just because you don’t approve of periodicals that don’t support your views does not mean that they don’t exist. I saw a statistic on this website that 62% of American Catholics support change in the Church…

Pete
There are 3 types of lies–lies, damn lies, and statistics. --Mark Twain
Those number mean nothing.
To sum up what VH said, the Church is not a democracy, if people dont like it they are free to go. There were lots of times when Jesus said something that the people didnt want to hear and they stopped following Jesus from that time on.
 
Pete2,
You mistake intensity for anger…but I would say that VH and CD have summed up my own position as well as anyone can. I could frankly care less what some dissenting people choose to say they want. It isn’t a democracy and that suits me just fine. There is only one Catholic Church and if they don’t agree with the Holy See that’s on their souls.

The diversity of doctrines among n-Cs is a source of shameful disgrace and a witness against them that theirs is not a Holy Spirit led division. The people within the Catholic Church who refuse to follow church teaching are in sin…it’s really simple. You know it, I know it…and so do the people in question.

As for those “Catholics” that michaelp says are part of his program…I would venture to say that they were I large part ignorant of what the church teaches and most possibly the very dissenters that we are talking about. I’m not at all surprised that they would espouse an errant doctrine like Sola Fide…especially when the “Bible program” they join teaches them that it’s correct based on Sola Scriptura…

Those are not Catholics…they’re Protestants calling themselves Catholic.
 
40.png
Pete2:
Church Militant, you seem very angry and unhappy. Open up your heart, this is just a discussion.

Here is the point I’m trying to get across:

The people of the Church are deeply divided on a number of issues. You know this is true. Just because you don’t approve of periodicals that don’t support your views does not mean that they don’t exist. I saw a statistic on this website that 62% of American Catholics support change in the Church. In Europe, I’ll bet the number is at least as high.

I agree that the pope is very clear on his direction. But so what? If the majority of Catholics do not follow what the CCC says in their daily lives (birth control, sex before marriage, divorce, etc.), then the pope doesn’t have any real authority over them, does he?

So what’s the point of railing against Protestants for being so divisive? If so many Catholics are disrespecting Rome on a daily basis, then I’d say we’ve got our own problems to worry about?

Pete
Railing against Protestants is not called for, but certainly it is germane to point out that there is division in the Church because the Protestant principle of private judgement in matters of faith and morals has taken hold. More than that, the loyalty to Christ that we find among Protestants is not to be found among liberals, who say that one reilgion is as good as another, and that religious truth is illusory. So the Reformation enterprise, which was to increase faith, has ended in a general skepticism, at least toward Christian claims. So we seen an abandonment of
the morality that Christians labored for a thousand years to imbue in the peoples of the West.
 
Church Militant:
Pete2,

As for those “Catholics” that michaelp says are part of his program…I would venture to say that they were in large part ignorant of what the church teaches and most possibly the very dissenters that we are talking about. I’m not at all surprised that they would espouse an errant doctrine like Sola Fide…especially when the “Bible program” they join teaches them that it’s correct based on Sola Scriptura…
Those are not Catholics…they’re Protestants calling themselves Catholic.
Yes CM. But let’s really call it like it is. The Catholic Church **is **unity. The infallible doctrines are taught by the Church as absolute truth–guaranteed by the Holy Spirit. Those Catholics who disagree with any infallible doctrine of the Church, are not really Catholics! They may not know it, but they have automatically ex-communicated themselves as heretics.
 
40.png
michaelp:
And, in truth, even if you accept that number, you are just one of the 33000 denominations/traditions that claim Christ, the Bible, and roots in the historic church.
Michael,

Actually that is not correct. That is 33000 protestant denominations. There is only one Catholic Church. The Catholic Church was the only christian church until the 16th century.

God Bless.
 
40.png
michaelp:
Great post Pete. I agree–unified in name is nothing. You look at the “Cafeteria Catholics” on the street and I look to this forum and see great disunity. What matters is pretty simple, “Who do you say that Christ is?” If He is God and savior, then you have more true unity with other Christians than any catechism or Pope can force you into.

Michael
I agree with you both, however, regardless of how many views there are out there, there is but one Church authority that teaches. I seriously doubt that all the 36,000+ denominations get together (maybe in a council) and define Christian Doctrine for the world.

I am totally against cafeteria Catholics, but we still have one Main teaching body.

God bless
 
Catholic Dude:
Those number mean nothing.
To sum up what VH said, the Church is not a democracy, if people dont like it they are free to go. There were lots of times when Jesus said something that the people didnt want to hear and they stopped following Jesus from that time on.
Dead on Dude!!!

God Bless
 
Michaelp, great points…you’ve basically taken the words right out of my mouth regarding the RCC just being another of the 36,000 denominations no matter what is claimed otherwise. Now there you are in Frisco and I’m on the other side of the country…I’ve never even met you, and here we are in complete unity, bro! Amazing how that works.

Pete2, thanks for your honesty regarding something that a lot of Catholics on message boards don’t like admitting to. As a former Catholic, and having Catholics for relatives and in-laws, you are right on the money. As devout and regular church attenders as they are, there is no unity in reality based on their picking and choosing what to believe and the way they live various aspects of their lives in defiance of the RCC.

I just finished reading John Cornwell’s “Breaking Faith.” The amount of disunity in the RCC that he detailed at ALL levels of RCC laity and hierarchy was depressing, even for me.

I was at a typical RC church recently for my niece’s first communion. When it was time to sing the first hymn, my kids were astounded that few were actually participating. They just couldn’t figure out how hundreds of people could produce such little volume!!! This may seem a trivial point to Catholics who care little about those that surround them in the pews. But it is very revealing regarding the reality of RC “unity.” We had to explain to our kids afterward that this is typical in a Catholic church where it is often a sense of obligation, culture, or custom that drives the majority of its members to attend, as opposed to a real unity in the person of Christ and a desire to worship Him as true brothers and sisters.

The dominant sense I have had in every Catholic church I have ever been in since chiuldhood is that the congregation is composed of people who are mostly strangers to each other; that the concept of being brothers and sisters in Christ is not a living reality to them.

By the way, I get a kick out of the revelry over the quaint “Bible thumper” cartoon guy. I have observed that attempted expressions of disdain for evangelicals by Roman Catholics often come in the form of Biblical association…as if being linked to God’s Word is something to be embarrassed about! Ironic as well as revealing.
 
40.png
arcturus:
We had to explain to our kids afterward that this is typical in a Catholic church where it is often a sense of obligation, culture, or custom that drives the majority of its members to attend, as opposed to a real unity in the person of Christ and a desire to worship Him as true brothers and sisters.
First of all, that was just uncharitable. I don’t think anyone here would try to come away from a Protestant service and say that there is nothing there because they are not in full unity with Christ. As well, I can assure you that many Catholics worship with a real desire for Christ.
The dominant sense I have had in every Catholic church I have ever been in since chiuldhood is that the congregation is composed of people who are mostly strangers to each other; that the concept of being brothers and sisters in Christ is not a living reality to them.
Another bunk notion. It depends more on how large the community is. Our community isn’t that large, and we do have sense of family in our parish. Large parishes would be quite unwieldy though, as many who go there aren’t from the community, but are transients.
By the way, I get a kick out of the revelry over the quaint “Bible thumper” cartoon guy. I have observed that attempted expressions of disdain for evangelicals by Roman Catholics often come in the form of Biblical association…as if being linked to God’s Word is something to be embarrassed about! Ironic as well as revealing.
No, it’s not disdain, but rather because guys like you come here with much disdain for Catholics as well. Well–you get what you ask for, really. It’s not because of Biblical association, but because of the attitudes some Protestants have against Catholics.
 
Arcturus,

In what chruch did you find the fullness of Truth? The History, Authority, Apostolic Roots, Theologians, Early Christian Writings??
The Catholic Church has the fullness of all of those.

I have a hard time believing you left the CC for something that could do better than that. If you have questions/comments ask them and we will help you come back to the one true Church.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top