Paul could never seem to get it together.
One minute, he’s a passionate Pharisee,
the next minute, now he’s a passionate Christian.
One minute he’s talking about faith in Jesus -as constituting ‘salvation,’
“Believe in the Lord Jesus and you will be saved…” [Acts 16]
and the next minute he’s saying:
“Work out your salvation in fear and trembling.” [Philippians 2]
Then we leap to James, to add to the confusion:
“…faith without works is useless…” [James 2]
So:
on Tuesdays and Saturdays, faith in Jesus = salvation?
on Mondays and Wednesdays = fear and trembling [aka ‘works’]?
The whole structure of this novel theology was built on a foundation of angelfood cake: ontological sin.
No one was awaiting a savior from sin.
A messiah [the anointed] is awaited - who will establish
God’s kingdom on earth - just as King David, strengthened by
God, led His people.
Jesus had it in his head that he was that messiah.
Paul fell all over himself, trying to provide a ‘reason’ for a savior.
“I know! I’ll say that we ‘inherit’ the sin of Adam.”
No one who knew Torah would have taken this flight of fancy seriously.
Hence, Paul headed off to the Gentiles, who wouldn’t have known Torah.
reen12