Where does social justice begin

  • Thread starter Thread starter elts1956
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Social Justice begins at conception. Social Justice primarily deals with how we treat the innocent and those unable to defend themselves. Who is more innocent, who is more helpless than the babe in her mothers womb. If the person doesn’t receive justice then, they are never going to get the chance to receive it.
 
This has come about due to the “Consistent Life Ethics” and Seamless Garment argument that came from Bernardin, has it not? I, like our departed bishop Martino, will say, “the USCCB doesn’t speak for me!” The term social justice has been distorted to the point where it is unrecognizable. They seem to have completely forgotten solidarity and any common good. Common good now only relates to the “poor” and the political clout they are being given by the radical, left-leaning Alinskyian style community organizing of all the groups the USCCB supports. :mad:

Well, let’s see now. The USCCB supports Obamacare! They support a blanket amnesty regardless of the fact that many blue collar jobs and the poor in America are losing their employment to illegals (especially hard to take with a tanked economy!) They support government control of right wing media outlets. They are against Constitutional civil liberties like the right to bear arms. They support government collectivism BUT have they forgotten that the State in its Almighty Power will also be the arbiter of moral issues. I think they have! Their CCHD openly funds and supports those groups advocating for abortion rights for the poor, same-sex marriage, and the legalization of prostitution! I, for one, will not listen to the USCCB regarding any political statement that bureaucracy makes.

One really wonders these days with all the declarations (NOT Catechesis) coming from them how it relates to the doctrine of indefectibility. Although the statements they make are not binding, those Catholics who lack good prudential judgment will surely be led astray! The truth of the Church will stand, but woe to our bishops!
I had a priest tell me that Obamacare is the closest ideal to the Social Justice theories of the Church that has ever existed. He even had the audacity to say, “Well, abortion has always existed”. I told him hes, but never has it been given legality before. Yes, indeed, if one thinks health care for all, spread the wealth, and socialism is the ultimate goal of human society; If our priests are upholding and teaching the Seamless Garment theory to the laity, the laity seems to think that absolves them of all responsibility for thinking and following the teachings of the Church as given to us by Christ and His apostles until now. We follow like sheep.

I looked the priest right in the eye and told him I would pray for him and I meant it very much. I said this not out of a feeling of superiority, but a gut feeling that he needs all the prayers he can get. So much confusion exists because we have so few leaders willing to teach the TRUTHS of the Church. I don’t think the Obama clergy have even read the encyclicals of the Popes, or if they do, the theology is way over their heads.

I do believe though, that many of them mistakenly believe in Obama’s Social Justice theories but forget completely these theories are being touted by a secular government having their own agenda and I truly don’t believe it is a Christian one.
 
This has come about due to the “Consistent Life Ethics” and Seamless Garment argument that came from Bernardin, has it not? I, like our departed bishop Martino, will say, “the USCCB doesn’t speak for me!” The term social justice has been distorted to the point where it is unrecognizable. They seem to have completely forgotten solidarity and any common good. Common good now only relates to the “poor” and the political clout they are being given by the radical, left-leaning Alinskyian style community organizing of all the groups the USCCB supports. :mad:

Well, let’s see now. The USCCB supports Obamacare! They support a blanket amnesty regardless of the fact that many blue collar jobs and the poor in America are losing their employment to illegals (especially hard to take with a tanked economy!) They support government control of right wing media outlets. They are against Constitutional civil liberties like the right to bear arms. They support government collectivism BUT have they forgotten that the State in its Almighty Power will also be the arbiter of moral issues. I think they have! Their CCHD openly funds and supports those groups advocating for abortion rights for the poor, same-sex marriage, and the legalization of prostitution! I, for one, will not listen to the USCCB regarding any political statement that bureaucracy makes.

One really wonders these days with all the declarations (NOT Catechesis) coming from them how it relates to the doctrine of indefectibility. Although the statements they make are not binding, those Catholics who lack good prudential judgment will surely be led astray! The truth of the Church will stand, but woe to our bishops!
Poverty, access to health care, and racial injustice are my three primary concerns when it comes to social justice. So I couldn’t vote in the poll.
Stop wavering and read some good Catholic authors and articles. We can’t be faithful to our faith through osmosis.
 
Stop wavering and read some good Catholic authors and articles. We can’t be faithful to our faith through osmosis.
Uh, what prompted that remark, and what did it have to do with Tigg’s comment which you quoted? :confused:
 
Uh, what prompted that remark, and what did it have to do with Tigg’s comment which you quoted? :confused:
Sounds like an “if abortion isn’t first on your political wish list you can’t be a real Catholic” remark.

If I were American, I think poverty and health care would be high on my list too. General attitude to human life is big for me, and I don’t think it can be separated from abortion. I don’t thing abortion changes in the law are really possible without other kinds of changes first, so my focus would be more on that specifically with regard to abortion.

But in the end, I think an honest candidate is the biggest deal. I suspect in Canada of the major party leaders the PM would be the most likely to be pro-life, but I could never vote for a person who lies to the public about their own system of government and how it works. Someone who does that doesn’t really respect Truth or Government or Law.
 
Sounds like an “if abortion isn’t first on your political wish list you can’t be a real Catholic” remark.

If I were American, I think poverty and health care would be high on my list too. General attitude to human life is big for me, and I don’t think it can be separated from abortion. I don’t thing abortion changes in the law are really possible without other kinds of changes first, so my focus would be more on that specifically with regard to abortion.

But in the end, I think an honest candidate is the biggest deal. I suspect in Canada of the major party leaders the PM would be the most likely to be pro-life, but I could never vote for a person who lies to the public about their own system of government and how it works. Someone who does that doesn’t really respect Truth or Government or Law.
Although I agree with you regarding a respect for ALL human life. Social Justice Begins in the Womb. THAT is the lowest common denominator. 🙂
 
Sounds like an “if abortion isn’t first on your political wish list you can’t be a real Catholic” remark.

If I were American, I think poverty and health care would be high on my list too. General attitude to human life is big for me, and I don’t think it can be separated from abortion. I don’t thing abortion changes in the law are really possible without other kinds of changes first, so my focus would be more on that specifically with regard to abortion.

But in the end, I think an honest candidate is the biggest deal. I suspect in Canada of the major party leaders the PM would be the most likely to be pro-life, but I could never vote for a person who lies to the public about their own system of government and how it works. Someone who does that doesn’t really respect Truth or Government or Law.
Uh, what prompted that remark, and what did it have to do with Tigg’s comment which you quoted? :confused:
Pray and read.🙂
 
Poverty, access to health care, and racial injustice are my three primary concerns when it comes to social justice. So I couldn’t vote in the poll.
I’m with you on the poverty issue. Health care, I agree with the post suggesting that our law makers should be required to have the same heath care program all of us might be required to have. As for your concerns about racial injustice? I can only say that we are all entitled to our own opinions on this issue, and mine is that if there is still any racial injustice, especially after 40+ years post civil rights, it is because that is the way our political leadership wants it to be. The unfortunate part about making “just” our racially “injust” society, at least the way we’ve been going at it for the last 40+ years, is that some other segment of our society is adversely affected; read: reverse discrimination!
 
You didn’t include this option in the poll. Maybe you did that on purpose?
If justice were served within relationships between persons there would be no need for the state to form courts of law and appoint judges to preside over them. The place justice is supposed to manifest is within the relationship of the persons who have been the cause of and the victim of offense.
Well said. 👍
 
Jesus told us to so it MUST be the right. The problem is that not enough people listen to him. 😦
You can say that again. However, I am coming to the opinion it takes more than listening. Some people need to be hit over the head, so to speak, just to get their attention. If more Catholics don’t begin to come out of their “tolerance” phase very soon, I am afraid there are going to be even fewer who listen. Especially ones who want to listen. We are, just as the Israelites, “A stiff necked people”.
 
Unfortunately many of the items in the poll are not cut and dry. such as the ecconomy. Social justice means more charity and a code of ethics between individual customers and service providers. Unfortunately some see this as purely weath redistribution. With war are you talking about wars of aggression or preparing for self defense or that ambiguous area of self defense on foriegn shores? I’d like us to redirect resources to defense of the nation instead of interfeering with foriegners. Climate is another area where there is a vast array of different perspectives.

I think we need to look at the underlying common denominators based on the commandments we were given.
What has happened is an emergence of “buzzword bills” in which Congress passes laws that sound good but which are not well thought out and are either impractical or hopelessly expensive. Cash for Clunkers, as one small example. The various bail out bills, as other examples. Free government healthcare, another example.

When in a debate with liberals, I proposed TOTAL abolition of the military budget, the libs began arguing why we needed a military. I used their own arguments of absurdity to demolish their defense of the military. [That the United States has no business being the world’s policeman. That the Soviet Union was all bluster. That the United States has no enemies and that Mexico and Canada who are closest pose no threat.] In fact, the United States Constitution was adopted in 1787 and by 1805, the United States was at war in North Africa (against the Barbary Pirates who were the earlier versions of the people who attacked the United States on 9/11). And in 1812, the United States was attacked and the capital, Washington DC, was burned to the ground.

The United States is not the world’s policeman, but it has taken on the role of the world’s defender. After having recaptured Europe from the tyranny of Nazi Germany and thwarted military action by the Soviet Union, the United States figured it would be cheaper in American lives and American tax money to pre-empt foreign attacks on countries with whom we shared strategic values, rather than have to go in afterwards and try to undo the damage.
 
=elts1956;5861075]The USCCB report regarding Social Justice is ambiguious at best. After reading this example of leadership by our Bishops, many are left with the abosolute belief there are no Intrinsic Evils, no hierarchy of evils, that all moral issues carry the same weight. This attitude had an immense impact on the outcome of this past Presidential election.
Since 2010 is slowly coming into view and being this is an election year for some members of the House, I am personally curious as to whether any attitudes have changed regarding the Truths of the Church as they should be taught.
So I am asking you to rate which issue will be uppermost in your minds as you go to the polls next November to either elect your representatives, or help them retain their governmental seats.
As a single issue abortion HAS TO have preference, but I find those who support implicitly or explicitly abortion often also suffort the other “intrinsic evils” same sex union [can’t get my self to say marriage], stem cell research, and I would add Government Controlled Health Care, knowing FULLWELL that THIS Government will beyond any shadow of doubt, abuse the power and set “conditions” for who lives and who dies. Who received assistance and who does not will be closely aligned with “toeing” the political ine of those in Governance. This friend is closely tied to population control.

Dear God Help us.
Pat
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top