Hi RedHen,
How do we know we know all of the “code patterns”? We’ve just mapped these genomes in the relatively few past years. 100 years from now, I bet a whole lot will get elaborated upon, revised, etc.
I’m not a geneticist either, but when a peer reviewed study is published on a U.S. gov’t website, I trust that the basic claims are true, or else other scientists would be jumping up and down and arguing against it.
genome.gov/Pages/Research/DIR/Chimp_Analysis.pdf
This guy is saying we can be sure two chromosomes fused. So then, what happened? We had a male and a female, both having fused chromosomes at exactly the same place, at the same time, and somehow found each other among the other millions, and mated?
Evolution doesn’t occur in individuals, it’s seen in populations, over time. What we have in individuals are variations, like the fused chromosome.
And then we had one baby with 23 sets of chromosomes among the other baby gorillas with 24 sets? And that baby gorilla was human? So then we’ve got one human male or female. Now, when it grows up, it has to mate with one of it’s parents, right? Nobody else has 23 sets of chromosomes.
Humans didn’t evolve from apes, chimps or monkeys; we share a common ancestor with them. We don’t need to have both parents with the same genetic material in order for it to be passed on. Except for recessive traits, for example, blond hair.
If the variation (fused chromosome) is advantageous, it stands a good chance of being passed on through heredity. It looks like one of genes in this chromosome 2 is an enzyme for vitamin B12, which is important for the brain,
Here’s an interview with Ken Miller
pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/defense-ev.html
Here’s one of the first questions;
Q: Where do you come from personally on this topic?
Miller: I think that faith and reason are both gifts from God. And if God is real, then faith and reason should complement each other rather than be in conflict. Science is the child of reason. Reason has given us the ability to establish the scientific method to investigate the world around us, and to show that the world and the universe in which we live are far vaster and far more complex, and I think far more wonderful, than anyone could have imagined 1,000 or 2,000 years ago.
Does that mean that scientific reason, by taking some of the mystery out of nature, has taken away faith? I don’t think so. I think by revealing a world that is infinitely more complex and infinitely more varied and creative than we had ever believed before, in a way it deepens our faith and our appreciation for the author of that nature, the author of that physical universe. And to people of faith, that author is God.
Now, I’m a scientist and I have faith in God. But that doesn’t make faith a scientific proposition. Faith and reason are both necessary to the religious person for a proper understanding of the world in which we live, and there is ultimately no necessary contradiction between reason and faith.