O
otjm
Guest
That is what the LDS say.Heaven is very much a physical place.
That is what the LDS say.Heaven is very much a physical place.
Actually, it is not a minor nit-pick. Words have meaning, and too many people throw words around as if they are more flexible than Gumby. Doing so is at least imprecise; and I applaud.Minor nit-pick
Why are you now focussing upon that?Why the focus on bodily assumption if no prominent teaching on Mother Mary’s physical whereabouts? If she went to another (non-physical) realm, why the focus on her physical body? And Jesus’ for that matter?
The Virgin Mary’s physical body did die. Her soul went to Heaven.if the key point is that Mary’s physical body didn’t die and she’s no longer physically here on earth
There is a very clear teaching on this. Physically, the Blessed Virgin is in Heaven.on where she is, physically. I think there must be no clear teaching on this
Heaven is both a physically real realm in which the souls of the Blessed now dwell, and a state of blessed happiness-- the Beatific Vision.–if we have in the back of our minds that heaven is likely someplace outside the physical universe or reality as we know it. Make any sense?
We have several who have said heaven is a physical place. I repeat the above; it is not a planet circling Betelgeuse or Bellatrix or Alnitak.As Pope John Paul 2 said, heaven is not a place; it is a state of being. So no intelligible answer can be given to the question “physically”.
Part1But point is: I’m not sure why the focus on her physical earthly body–the resurrected body, in which we Catholics believe–if we have in the back of our minds that heaven is likely someplace outside the physical universe or reality as we know it. Make any sense? If it weren’t a mystery of the rosary, I wouldn’t be as curious.
990 The term “flesh” refers to man in his state of weakness and mortality.536 The “resurrection of the flesh” (the literal formulation of the Apostles’ Creed) means not only that the immortal soul will live on after death, but that even our “mortal body” will come to life again.537
Risen with Christ
1002Christ will raise us up “on the last day”; but it is also true that, in a certain way, we have already risen with Christ. For, by virtue of the Holy Spirit, Christian life is already now on earth a participation in the death and Resurrection of Christ:
And you were buried with him in Baptism, in which you were also raised with him through faith in the working of God, who raised him from the dead . . . . If then you have been raised with Christ, seek the things that are above, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God.559
1003United with Christ by Baptism, believers already truly participate in the heavenly life of the risen Christ, but this life remains "hidden with Christ in God."560 The Father has already "raised us up with him, and made us sit with him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus."561 Nourished with his body in the Eucharist, we already belong to the Body of Christ. When we rise on the last day we "also will appear with him in glory."562
https://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p123a11.htm1004 In expectation of that day, the believer’s body and soul already participate in the dignity of belonging to Christ. This dignity entails the demand that he should treat with respect his own body, but also the body of every other person, especially the suffering:
The body [is meant] for the Lord, and the Lord for the body. And God raised the Lord and will also raise us up by his power. Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ? . . . . You are not your own; . . . . So glorify God in your body.563
- In the fifteenth century, during a later period of scholastic theology, St. Bernardine of Siena collected and diligently evaluated all that the medieval theologians had said and taught on this question. He was not content with setting down the principal considerations which these writers of an earlier day had already expressed, but he added others of his own. The likeness between God’s Mother and her divine Son, in the way of the nobility and dignity of body and of soul - a likeness that forbids us to think of the heavenly Queen as being separated from the heavenly King - makes it entirely imperative that Mary “should be only where Christ is.”(35) Moreover, it is reasonable and fitting that not only the soul and body of a man, but also the soul and body of a woman should have obtained heavenly glory. Finally, since the Church has never looked for the bodily relics of the Blessed Virgin nor proposed them for the veneration of the people, we have a proof on the order of a sensible experience.(36)
- The above-mentioned teachings of the holy Fathers and of the Doctors have been in common use during more recent times. Gathering together the testimonies of the Christians of earlier days, St. Robert Bellarmine exclaimed: “And who, I ask, could believe that the ark of holiness, the dwelling place of the Word of God, the temple of the Holy Spirit, could be reduced to ruin? My soul is filled with horror at the thought that this virginal flesh which had begotten God, had brought him into the world, had nourished and carried him, could have been turned into ashes or given over to be food for worms.”(37)
http://www.vatican.va/content/pius-...-xii_apc_19501101_munificentissimus-deus.html
- In like manner St. Francis de Sales, after asserting that it is wrong to doubt that Jesus Christ has himself observed, in the most perfect way, the divine commandment by which children are ordered to honor their parents, asks this question: “What son would not bring his mother back to life and would not bring her into paradise after her death if he could?”(38) And St. Alphonsus writes that “Jesus did not wish to have the body of Mary corrupted after death, since it would have redounded to his own dishonor to have her virginal flesh, from which he himself had assumed flesh, reduced to dust.”(39)
Wouldn’t be strange if that wouldn’t be important?
- Now God has willed that the Blessed Virgin Mary should be exempted from this general rule. She, by an entirely unique privilege, completely overcame sin by her Immaculate Conception, and as a result she was not subject to the law of remaining in the corruption of the grave, and she did not have to wait until the end of time for the redemption of her body.
Rhetoricaly speaking:I’m focusing on it because of the glorious mystery of the Assumption of Mary: if the key point is that Mary’s physical body didn’t die and she’s no longer physically here on earth, I’m just curious if there have been any good writings or thoughts on where she is, physically.
Mary’s body is important; but it is a resurrected body, not a corruptible one. And the Church has little to say beyond what Scripture tells us -see the Gospels and Acts. It is “the same, but not the same”.If our bodies are important then how Mary’s body wouldn’t be?
They were saying to one another, “Who will roll back the stone for us from the entrance to the tomb?”
When they looked up, they saw that the stone had been rolled back; it was very large.
Mark 16:3-4