P
PRmerger
Guest
Fine then assume that scripture is insufficient and Paul was wrong
Could you answer this, please, benhur?Scripture is sufficient?
Where does Paul say that?
Fine then assume that scripture is insufficient and Paul was wrong
Could you answer this, please, benhur?Scripture is sufficient?
Where does Paul say that?
Sorry, you take tradition one subtle step to far. 99.9999%Actually, Scripture is a product of the Holy Tradition, alongside many other products, such as the Seven Sacraments, which bear the unwritten words of Jesus within them, and the Magisterium, and the Councils, and all that arises from the Councils.![]()
The Apostles weren’t following Jesus around with lined scribblers and Bic pens, or even vellum, writing knives, and various dyes, taking down notes. The first writings of the New Testament began to be penned in the 60s AD.Catalyst and table of contents are different topics. as well as what happens before God puts it in writing . I used the word “today”… So because you think you compile into table of contents it is equally subject to you ? As venerable as the custodian is they have as much authority as what is kept ?
What denomination, in your beliefs, were the Apostles; since they obviously weren’t Protestants, and all?Sorry, you take tradition one subtle step to far. 99.9999%
agreement is pretty good though but that .0001% is arsenic for both of us, a definite stumbling block.
No, they didn’t need to have those things, for perfect memory was theirs in the gifting and power of the Holy ghost . That is why it was penned that God could have given us books thru inspired writers (no need for tape recorders or Bic pens) of what Jesus said and didThe Apostles weren’t following Jesus around with lined scribblers and Bic pens, or even vellum, writing knives, and various dyes, taking down notes. The first writings of the New Testament began to be penned in the 60s AD.
As has been pointed out, the name “protestant” nor “Catholic” (as a noun, not adjective) were not around then . Belief’s on the other hand we have on record thru Writ and some tradition (father writings). Apostolic is as apostolic does, a Gumperism (Forest Gump movie, “stupid is as stupid does”). So, today see who is doing and preaching what the apostles did , not resting on what any church did yesterday ( admonition from Revelation 7 churches). Anything beyond that must be filter out any self serving, banner waving “parochialism”.What denomination, in your beliefs, were the Apostles; since they obviously weren’t Protestants, and all?
Are you familiar with Letter to the Smyrnaeans, by any chance?As has been pointed out, the name “protestant” nor “Catholic” (as a noun, not adjective) were not around then . Belief’s on the other hand we have on record thru Writ and some tradition (father writings). Apostolic is as apostolic does, a Gumperism (Forest Gump movie, “stupid is as stupid does”). So, today see who is doing and preaching what the apostles did , not resting on what any church did yesterday ( admonition from Revelation 7 churches). Anything beyond that must be filter out any self serving, banner waving “parochialism”.
The section of this letter that has the term ‘Catholic’ in it refers to it as if it was around since even before then. See:Are you familiar with Letter to the Smyrnaeans, by any chance?
The Catholic and Orthodox churches seem to be preaching what the apostles did, as the apostles were most likely Catholic/Orthodox; and given how they have unbroken apostolic succession from the apostles. I can give you countless amounts of evidence in the favor of the Catholic Church’s consistent history and beliefs, but you’ll probably dismiss it because of prior biases and opinions. Do you have any evidence of there being any of your Protestant-specific beliefs during early Christianity?As has been pointed out, the name “protestant” nor “Catholic” (as a noun, not adjective) were not around then . Belief’s on the other hand we have on record thru Writ and some tradition (father writings). Apostolic is as apostolic does, a Gumperism (Forest Gump movie, “stupid is as stupid does”). So, today see who is doing and preaching what the apostles did , not resting on what any church did yesterday ( admonition from Revelation 7 churches). Anything beyond that must be filter out any self serving, banner waving “parochialism”.
Yes, have to get back to you on theologically answering that. .Forgot my readings on that. But… don’t go along with those who suggest that we espouse that all you need is a bible and curl up into a ball with it and that is sufficient. Again, are in agreement of Scripture and church and Holy spirit and other Words from God and some tradition etc etc are all elements involved in “enlightenment”. Just that the custodian is not above that which she keeps and is under same constrictions of being “materially” sufficient but not formally either. Being “tight” with the custodian may or may not enlighten you. Reading what she keeps may or may not enlighten you. Why even those that hung out with the author of the writings were not all enlightened (even the author was only materially sufficient while 3 plus years on earth ).
- Formally sufficient or materially sufficient?
- What did Paul use for Scriptures?
Hi baby boomer Spina.What post of mine are you referring to ?Ho benhur: What rules are you talking about? I do not see any rules in Scripture saying and also why did not all of the Apostles write instead of only a few? What rules did the Apostles use in writing down what they did write? As I did not see that one either in the NT.
The Holy Bible isn’t all that you need, by the way. You do realize that every one of your pastors and bishops have different beliefs, right? How do you know which one is right? You don’t have a united Church, so you wouldn’t know.Yes, have to get back to you on theologically answering that. .Forgot my readings on that. But… don’t go along with those who suggest that we espouse that all you need is a bible and curl up into a ball with it and that is sufficient. Again, are in agreement of Scripture and church and Holy spirit and other Words from God and some tradition etc etc are all elements involved in “enlightenment”. Just that the custodian is not above that which she keeps and is under same constrictions of being “materially” sufficient but not formally either. Being “tight” with the custodian may or may not enlighten you. Reading what she keeps may or may not enlighten you. Why even those that hung out with the author of the writings were not all enlightened (even the author was only materially sufficient while 3 plus years on earth ).
Ignatius but zero memory of content, but definitely a backslapper of heirarchy, some beautiful writing but almost to the point of puzzlement to motive. Reminds me of travelling pastors who really lift up with a flattering tongue the home pastors who invited them to speak, barely knowing them.Are you familiar with Letter to the Smyrnaeans, by any chance?
Sorry about that it is post 284 I believe.Hi baby boomer Spina.What post of mine are you referring to ?
With due respect to Mr./Ms. Unknown, nonsense. Luther did not found a Church.How Old is Your Church?
AUTHOR UNKNOWN
If you are a Lutheran, your religion was founded by Martin Luther, an ex-monk of the Catholic Church, in the year 1517.
Yes, the word catholic has been around since the early Greek language, way before the Church. As I stated in another post, that here it is an adjective not a noun. Eventually it did become a “capital C” but not here, not yet. As there was a universal church then, there is now. That you call yourself “universal” with a capital C does not mean that you are exclusive to others, just as being called the “Church of God” or Jehovah’s Witness’s does .The section of this letter that has the term ‘Catholic’ in it refers to it as if it was around since even before then. See:
Right, that is what folks say is materially sufficient but not formally. I thought I listed quite a few other things that may be helpful (materially), did I not ?The Holy Bible isn’t all that you need, by the way.
I am still lost to your question.Sorry about that it is post 284 I believe.