D
dennisknapp
Guest
Just wondering.
I live in the diocese of Milwaukee, where do you think it ranks?
Peace
I live in the diocese of Milwaukee, where do you think it ranks?
Peace
…agreed:thumbsup:Liberal is in the mind of the beholder.
Deacon Ed
Well then, which diocese allow their parishes to teach outside the magisterium?Liberal is in the mind of the beholder.
Deacon Ed
I think that you can objectively say which dioceses are orthodox in their teachings and which are not.Liberal is in the mind of the beholder.
What makes Detroit a liberal diocese?Check out Cleveland, LA and Albany. Altoona PA was bad but I have heard they are improving. I have to say Detroit, but the TLM was recently allowed so kudos to the Cardinal.
When I read or hear ‘Orthodox’ I think of the Eastern Rite catholics though…obviously I’m confused…can you help clarify the distinction?I think that you can objectively say which dioceses are orthodox in their teachings and which are not.
Liberal is perhaps a bad word, as is conservative. We should use the terms orthodox and unorthodox.
I have no problems with terms like “orthodox” and “heterodox.” However, I wonder who is qualified to make such determinations. Who among us knows the full gamut of what is orthodox? Is someone here qualified to say “that falls within the broad panoply of acceptable Catholic praxis or teaching” or to say that something is heterodox? This is not a rhetorical question. I do not judge the Church, even in her local incarnation as a Diocese. I guess there are others here who know the faith much better than I and who are fully qualified to make these distinctions.I think that you can objectively say which dioceses are orthodox in their teachings and which are not.
Liberal is perhaps a bad word, as is conservative. We should use the terms orthodox and unorthodox.
orthodox - or·tho·dox
*]Adhering to the accepted or traditional and established faith, especially in religion.
*]Adhering to the Christian faith as expressed in the early Christian ecumenical creeds.
heterodox - het·er·o·dox
adj.
*]Not in agreement with accepted beliefs, especially in church doctrine or dogma.
Almost! The Eastern Rites are in Communion with the Pope as are the Latin (Roman) rite.So we have Eastern orthodox and Western orthodox?
The Eastern being the Eastern Rite Catholics who do not recognize the Roman Pope, but are still completely ‘Catholic’ - legit sacraments,etc.
and the Western being the Roman Rite Catholics?
But under both branches (W & E) there can be orthodox Catholics and heterodox Catholics.
Am I understanding that correctly???
I think, for the question in this thread, we’re looking at the obvious indicators within a diocese. If at mass God is referred to as “She” or consistently “God” (obvious avoidance of the masculine term), or allows openly sexually active homosexuals to be Eucharistic Ministers there’s probably a rather high likelihood that the other teachings of the diocese/parish do not fall in line with Rome. We wouldn’t have to examine the ‘complete’ diocesan teachings when some of the very basics are obviously not heterodox.I have no problems with terms like “orthodox” and “heterodox.” However, I wonder who is qualified to make such determinations. Who among us knows the full gamut of what is orthodox? Is someone here qualified to say “that falls within the broad panoply of acceptable Catholic praxis or teaching” or to say that something is heterodox? This is not a rhetorical question. I do not judge the Church, even in her local incarnation as a Diocese. I guess there are others here who know the faith much better than I and who are fully qualified to make these distinctions.
Deacon Ed
Oi vey! :whacky:Almost! The Eastern Rites are in Communion with the Pope as are the Latin (Roman) rite.
The name Orthodox Church (capital O) is generally used to distinguish those of the Greek Rite who are not in communion with the Holy See.
However, there can be orthodox as well as heterodox.
But would that not reflect more on the parish than the Diocese? I’m not sure about where you live, but out here in California many of our diocese are larger than some states! The local bishop can’t always get around to each parish. Complaints are not always processed in a timely fashion and, frankly, the bishop may not see them all anyway.I think, for the question in this thread, we’re looking at the obvious indicators within a diocese. If at mass God is referred to as “She” or consistently “God” (obvious avoidance of the masculine term), or allows openly sexually active homosexuals to be Eucharistic Ministers there’s probably a rather high likelihood that the other teachings of the diocese/parish do not fall in line with Rome. We wouldn’t have to examine the ‘complete’ diocesan teachings when some of the very basics are obviously not heterodox.
Dear Mom:Oi vey! :whacky:
So all this discussion about mending the rift - reuniting The Church - is more about getting the Greeks to come home? I was under the impression it was Russian and others.
But at least I see I was justified in my original confusion over the term “Orthodox”…I only knew that the ‘other’ people were the Orthodox.
So where can I go online to see the Catholic Family Tree, per se??? Any link suggestions?
Ahhh! Glad you asked. I have a chart, but I can’t find it right now.Oi vey! :whacky:
So all this discussion about mending the rift - reuniting The Church - is more about getting the Greeks to come home? I was under the impression it was Russian and others.
But at least I see I was justified in my original confusion over the term “Orthodox”…I only knew that the ‘other’ people were the Orthodox.
So where can I go online to see the Catholic Family Tree, per se??? Any link suggestions?