M
Manfred
Guest
I read what is alleged to be, and most probably is, Fr Fessio’s response to your query re the RSV-2CE.I believe I had a response to some of my questions about the RSV-2CE by Fr. Fessio: catholicbibles.blogspot.com/2008/11/response-from-fr-fessio-i-think.html
It deals with the editorial process of the new edition, along with how it was handled with Rome.
I must say I, too, am surprised that the CDW found places where the original RSV-CE (1965-66) should be corrected while missing so many others; e.g., Luke 1:34 (sorry, I can’t shake this one off). If the best the CDW could recommend was to remove the “archaic” English pronouns and verb endings, and substitute words like “chalice” for “cup”, then I would question their expertise, just as I do the bishops’ conferences, for anything related to English-language liturgical or scriptural texts. ( I am so going to catch it now from certain folks in these here parts.)