Which church is God's true church? Is it the Roman Catholic Church?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimmy_B
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Can you read?
Sacrament of the Anointing of the Sick:

James 5:13-15

The Prayer of Faith

13Is any one of you in trouble? He should pray. Is anyone happy? Let him sing songs of praise. 14Is any one of you sick? He should call the elders of the church to pray over him and anoint him with oil in the name of the Lord. 15And the prayer offered in faith will make the sick person well; the Lord will raise him up. If he has sinned, he will be forgiven.

🤷 Clear as day.
Are you trying to say that God only hears the prayers of Roman Catholic Priests to heal the sick? IF that’s true, all Roman Catholics should be in perfect health through the apparent sacrament of anointing the sick. I am saying that all Christians can come boldly before the throne of grace and can request healing. God heals or withholds healing according to His wisdom and absolute sovereignty. God will always hear His adopted children because of Christ. His answers to His adopted children are always right. You do not need a Roman Catholic Priest as your mediator between God and man. Christ is the mediator between God and man. God does not make a distinction between clergy and laity. All Christians are saints and makeup the royal priesthood.

Behold the new humanity consisting of those who are united to Christ:

1 Peter 2:9

But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for his own possession, that you may proclaim the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light.
 
Are you trying to say only Roman Catholic Priests can forgive sins? Only God forgives sins through Christ alone. All Christians are given the ministry of reconciliation. It is not a sacrament but a ministry. Here is the Word of God for further reflection on the ministry of reconciliation…
Only God forgives sin

1441
Only God forgives sins.39 Since he is the Son of God, Jesus says of himself, “The Son of man has authority on earth to forgive sins” and exercises this divine power: "Your sins are forgiven."40 Further, by virtue of his divine authority he gives this power to men to exercise in his name.41

1442
Christ has willed that in her prayer and life and action his whole Church should be the sign and instrument of the forgiveness and reconciliation that he acquired for us at the price of his blood. But he entrusted the exercise of the power of absolution to the apostolic ministry which he charged with the "ministry of reconciliation."42 The apostle is sent out “on behalf of Christ” with “God making his appeal” through him and pleading: "Be reconciled to God."43

39 Cf. Mk 2:7.
40 Mk 2:5,10; Lk 7:48.
41 Cf. Jn 20:21-23.
42 2 Cor 5:18.
43 2 Cor 5:20.

VIII. THE MINISTER OF THIS SACRAMENT

1461
Since Christ entrusted to his apostles the ministry of reconciliation,65 bishops who are their successors, and priests, the bishops’ collaborators, continue to exercise this ministry. Indeed bishops and priests, by virtue of the sacrament of Holy Orders, have the power to forgive all sins "in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit."

1462
Forgiveness of sins brings reconciliation with God, but also with the Church. Since ancient times the bishop, visible head of a particular Church, has thus rightfully been considered to be the one who principally has the power and ministry of reconciliation: he is the moderator of the penitential discipline.66 Priests, his collaborators, exercise it to the extent that they have received the commission either from their bishop (or religious superior) or the Pope, according to the law of the Church.67

1463 Certain particularly grave sins incur excommunication, the most severe ecclesiastical penalty, which impedes the reception of the sacraments and the exercise of certain ecclesiastical acts, and for which absolution consequently cannot be granted, according to canon law, except by the Pope, the bishop of the place or priests authorized by them. In danger of death any priest, even if deprived of faculties for hearing confessions, can absolve from every sin and excommunication.69

1464 Priests must encourage the faithful to come to the sacrament of Penance and must make themselves available to celebrate this sacrament each time Christians reasonably ask for it.70

1465 When he celebrates the sacrament of Penance, the priest is fulfilling the ministry of the Good Shepherd who seeks the lost sheep, of the Good Samaritan who binds up wounds, of the Father who awaits the prodigal son and welcomes him on his return, and of the just and impartial judge whose judgment is both just and merciful. The priest is the sign and the instrument of God’s merciful love for the sinner.

1466 The confessor is not the master of God’s forgiveness, but its servant. The minister of this sacrament should unite himself to the intention and charity of Christ.71 He should have a proven knowledge of Christian behavior, experience of human affairs, respect and sensitivity toward the one who has fallen; he must love the truth, be faithful to the Magisterium of the Church, and lead the penitent with patience toward healing and full maturity. He must pray and do penance for his penitent, entrusting him to the Lord’s mercy.

1467 Given the delicacy and greatness of this ministry and the respect due to persons, the Church declares that every priest who hears confessions is bound under very severe penalties to keep absolute secrecy regarding the sins that his penitents have confessed to him. He can make no use of knowledge that confession gives him about penitents’ lives.72 This secret, which admits of no exceptions, is called the “sacramental seal,” because what the penitent has made known to the priest remains “sealed” by the sacrament.
 
Are you trying to say that God only hears the prayers of Roman Catholic Priests to heal the sick? IF that’s true, all Roman Catholics should be in perfect health through the apparent sacrament of anointing the sick. I am saying that all Christians can come boldly before the throne of grace and can request healing. God heals or withholds healing according to His wisdom and absolute sovereignty. God will always hear His adopted children because of Christ. His answers to His adopted children are always right. You do not need a Roman Catholic Priest as your mediator between God and man. Christ is the mediator between God and man. God does not make a distinction between clergy and laity. All Christians are saints and makeup the royal priesthood.

Behold the new humanity consisting of those who are united to Christ:

1 Peter 2:9

But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for his own possession, that you may proclaim the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light.
You need to study the ministerial priesthood of the Apostles and there successors, those Bishops with proper Holy Orders. :eek:
Also, you need to brush up on what actually happened in those days.
 
You need to study the ministerial priesthood of the Apostles and there successors, those Bishops with proper Holy Orders. :eek:
Also, you need to brush up on what actually happened in those days.
Protestants reject an apparent Roman Catholic version of apostolic succession because it is not biblical. You can claim all types of sacred tradition that cannot be found in the Bible. However, Protestant Christians will not receive apostolic succession and other sacred tradition as truth from God due to a lack of biblical support in all of Scripture. Do you see the central issue. What is authorative, the Holy Bible or the Catholic magestrium? We know through Scripture that it is impossible for God to lie. Therefore, I will trust in His Holy Word (Bible) as compared to teachings of men. BTW… God gave us the Bible and not the Roman Catholic Church. The Bible is God-breathed.
 
Protestants reject an apparent Roman Catholic version of apostolic succession because it is not biblical.You can claim all types of sacred tradition that cannot be found in the Bible. However, Protestant Christians will not receive apostolic succession and other sacred tradition as truth from God due to a lack of biblical support in all of Scripture. Do you see the central issue. What is authorative, the Holy Bible or the Catholic magestrium?
You reject the Word of GOD:

I. THE APOSTOLIC TRADITION

[75](javascript:openWindow(‘cr/75.htm’)😉
"Christ the Lord, in whom the entire Revelation of the most high God is summed up, commanded the apostles to preach the Gospel, which had been promised beforehand by the prophets, and which he fulfilled in his own person and promulgated with his own lips. In preaching the Gospel, they were to communicate the gifts of God to all men. This Gospel was to be the source of all saving truth and moral discipline."32

In the apostolic preaching. . .

76
In keeping with the Lord’s command, the Gospel was handed on in two ways:

** - **orally “by the apostles who handed on, by the spoken word of their preaching, by the example they gave, by the institutions they established, what they themselves had received - whether from the lips of Christ, from his way of life and his works, or whether they had learned it at the prompting of the Holy Spirit”;33

** - in writing “by those apostles and other men associated with the apostles who, under the inspiration of the same Holy Spirit, committed the message of salvation to writing”.34**

. . . continued in apostolic succession

[77](javascript:openWindow(‘cr/77.htm’)😉
“In order that the full and living Gospel might always be preserved in the Church **the apostles left bishops as their successors. They gave them their own position of teaching authority.”**35 Indeed, "the apostolic preaching, which is expressed in a special way in the inspired books, was to be preserved in a continuous line of succession until the end of time."36

[78](javascript:openWindow(‘cr/78.htm’)😉 This living transmission, accomplished in the Holy Spirit, is called Tradition, since it is distinct from Sacred Scripture, though closely connected to it. Through Tradition, "the Church, in her doctrine, life and worship, perpetuates and transmits to every generation all that she herself is, all that she believes."37 "The sayings of the holy Fathers are a witness to the life-giving presence of this Tradition, showing how its riches are poured out in the practice and life of the Church, in her belief and her prayer."38

79 The Father’s self-communication made through his Word in the Holy Spirit, remains present and active in the Church: "God, who spoke in the past, continues to converse with the Spouse of his beloved Son. And the Holy Spirit, through whom the living voice of the Gospel rings out in the Church - and through her in the world - leads believers to the full truth, and makes the Word of Christ dwell in them in all its richness."39

The Magisterium of the Church

[85](javascript:openWindow(‘cr/85.htm’)😉
"The task of giving an authentic interpretation of the Word of God, whether in its written form or in the form of Tradition, has been entrusted to the living teaching office of the Church alone. Its authority in this matter is exercised in the name of Jesus Christ."47 This means that the task of interpretation has been entrusted to the bishops in communion with the successor of Peter, the Bishop of Rome.
[86](javascript:openWindow(‘cr/86.htm’)😉 "Yet this Magisterium is not superior to the Word of God, but is its servant. It teaches only what has been handed on to it. At the divine command and with the help of the Holy Spirit, it listens to this devotedly, guards it with dedication and expounds it faithfully. All that it proposes for belief as being divinely revealed is drawn from this single deposit of faith."48
[87](javascript:openWindow(‘cr/87.htm’)😉 Mindful of Christ’s words to his apostles: “He who hears you, hears me”,49 the faithful receive with docility the teachings and directives that their pastors give them in different forms.

The mess of protestantism with all its conflicting beliefs proves what happens when you don’t have the magisterium. :eek:
 
Protestants reject an apparent Roman Catholic version of apostolic succession because it is not biblical. You can claim all types of sacred tradition that cannot be found in the Bible. However, Protestant Christians will not receive apostolic succession and other sacred tradition as truth from God due to a lack of biblical support in all of Scripture. Do you see the central issue. What is authorative, the Holy Bible or the Catholic magestrium? We know through Scripture that it is impossible for God to lie. Therefore, I will trust in His Holy Word (Bible) as compared to teachings of men. BTW… God gave us the Bible and not the Roman Catholic Church. The Bible is God-breathed.
Apostolic succession is Biblical. If it wasn’t required why did Peter make Matthias an apostle? He wasn’t just a preacher he was an apostle. If you believe in scriptura sola how do you refute the clear annointing of another apostle after Judas died.

Acts Of Apostles 1

26 And they gave them lots, and the lot fell upon Matthias, and he was numbered with the eleven apostles.

How do you refute Clement from the Bible assuming the role of Pope after Peters death. The documentation is clear in his letters. Do you refute an eyewitness from the Bible because you believe you can read the Bible better 2,000 years later? This man lived with the apostles; yet, you know more than him.

You refute the Bible and eyewitness testimony based upon your personal interpetation of a book the Catholics defined. Does this make sense to you?
 
Apostolic succession is Biblical. If it wasn’t required why did Peter make Matthias an apostle? He wasn’t just a preacher he was an apostle. If you believe in scriptura sola how do you refute the clear annointing of another apostle after Judas died.

Acts Of Apostles 1

26 And they gave them lots, and the lot fell upon Matthias, and he was numbered with the eleven apostles.

How do you refute Clement from the Bible assuming the role of Pope after Peters death. The documentation is clear in his letters. Do you refute an eyewitness from the Bible because you believe you can read the Bible better 2,000 years later? This man lived with the apostles; yet, you know more than him.

You refute the Bible and eyewitness testimony based upon your personal interpetation of a book the Catholics defined. Does this make sense to you?
We can debate many issues and avoid the actual contents of the Bible. If you believe what the Catholic Church tells you instead of studying the Scriptures for yourself, you are still in the dark ages.
 
We can debate many issues and avoid the actual contents of the Bible. If you believe what the Catholic Church tells you instead of studying the Scriptures for yourself, you are still in the dark ages.
Oh maaaannnnnn!!

There is a little song and it goes like this: “There’s a hole in my bucket, my bucket, my bucket…” Know it? Well you sound just like it.

🤷 :whistle: :whistle:
 
We can debate many issues and avoid the actual contents of the Bible. If you believe what the Catholic Church tells you instead of studying the Scriptures for yourself, you are still in the dark ages.
What?

I gave you a clear example of apostolic succession with the verse. In Acts it shows Peter and the apostles picking a replacement for Judas. If their is no apostolic succession why did they do this? Why did they specifically state he was numbered with the eleven. He wasn’t just a preacher he was an apostle. Do not state it is not in the Bible it is in Acts. How do you refute this story.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top