Which Church is Right?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jphilapy
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
justinmatter:
i really don’t know why you insist, in many of your posts on the difference in the way things are being done now as compared to when jesus did them.
the stress should be on doctrine- that hasn’t changed
On doctrine that doesn’t change, and on practices that are relevant. I don’t see how you can toss making disciples into the antiquated pile, or classify making disciples as being some other level of importance than a primary function of the church and one that must not ever be neglected. Obvious by your post you think discipleship can be relegated to the back burner. But how do you justify that point?
 
jphilapy:

The primary function of the Church has never been to make disciples, but to offer trueworship to the Trune God.

Even discipleship has this ultimately in end: to glofiry God.

Making disciples is not something that we all do as individual Catholics. We live lives of charity, and give answers to inquiry from others.

But discipleship presupposes the fact that we know what to believe, and so we can bring others to the true faith. Otherwise, conversion is pointless.

The Catholic Church is a missionary institution. It’s because of her that about 1/3 of the world today is at least nominally Christian.

More is to be done, and that’s how it’ll be until Christ comes again.

Things were not as utopian as you think they were in the early Church.

Please, be more concrete. What should we Catholics be doing that we aren’t? Or what should we not be doing?
 
I will add this.

There definitely is a lack of missionary spirit among many Catholics, but this isn’t because of the Church. It’s because of fallen human nature.

If Catholics were “more Catholic,” they’d be making disciples. If their seal in this regard is waned, it’s not because they’re Catholic, but it’s in spite of it.

On the part of Evangelical and Fundamentalist Protestants, it does no good for them to make disciples, if they’re not discipling them in the true religion.
 
40.png
DominvsVobiscvm:
jphilapy:

The primary function of the Church has never been to make disciples,
but to offer trueworship to the Trune God.

Even discipleship has this ultimately in end: to glofiry God.
On this I will say no and yes.

Worshipping God is not the primary function of the church. Worshipping
God is the primary Purpose. The function is how you get to the
purpose. In anycase it would seem that we both agree that discipleship
is necessary to meet that purpose.
40.png
DominvsVobiscvm:
Making disciples is not something that we all do as individual
Catholics. We live lives of charity, and give answers to inquiry from
others.
I shouldv’e been more clear when I referred to how Jesus made disciples. I wasn’t meaning the idea of one guy leading a group around and is devoted to training them. And yes you are right, not everyone can or is called to do that. What I am focusing on is the family and relational aspect of how Jesus made disciples. I am saying that if the correct enviornment is setup then it will allow for the discipleship to take place naturally and automatic. And I believe that everyone is called to help make disciples in that way. hence all the teaching on how each member of the body has a part. In otherwords believers should get together in a more intimate setting where they can get to know one another and learn to minister to one another on a consistent basis. I believe that is the most effective enviornment that will help get others involved and disciples them. Now I can be wrong, maybe you folks do that. But my experience with various churches, is that that kind of thing just doesn’t happen. Most people just sit in the pews as passive spectators while their clergy does all the ministry. However doesn’t the scripture say that all believers are called to function? How do you see that happening in your church?
40.png
DominvsVobiscvm:
Things were not as utopian as you think they were in the early Church.
Obviously you don’t know what I am thinking.
40.png
DominvsVobiscvm:
Please, be more concrete. What should we Catholics be doing that w`e
aren’t? Or what should we not be doing?
I am not out to drag the catholic church through the mud. I have two purposes here.
  1. Make an informed descision of who I think is really the true church.
  2. strike up dialogue while I am here.
But for the record I think any church making claims to be the true church should fit the description as I stated above regarding creating a more intimate and relational enviornment and they should work much harder to get everyone who is a true believer involved in the process.

Jeff
 
But for the record I think any church making claims to be the true church should fit the description as I stated above regarding creating a more intimate and relational enviornment and they should work much harder to get everyone who is a true believer involved in the process.
This is something that has to permeate each believer’s life, not something done once a week. The purpose of the Mass is to worship and glorigy God, and to receive the necessary graces for salvation. Extraliturgical activitires, like the ones you describe, take place outside of Mass, at various functions, or simply in our daily exchanges and interactions with believers.

We live in very different circumstances than when Jesus lived. We simply cannot all live in really close proximity and intimacy. It’s impossible.

This sense of mutual help and fellowship exists in convents and monasteries, but simply can’t be done among those who live in the world.

Again, be concrete! If someone put you in charge, what would you do to change things?
 
This is a pretty long thread & I sort of scanned it so I hope I didn’ t miss a post that deals w/this part of this issue. If so; I apologize.

No one seems to have touched on the idea that Icons in the form of statues goes all the way back to Moses when God commanded that he make an image of the serpent and lift it up so that those who looked on it would be healed and live. This is also quoted in the NT as a type of Christ who was lifted up for us.

Also it was God himself who commanded that there be 2 images of Cherubim on the top of the Ark of the Covenant and the temple of Solomon had all kinds of art on it’s walls etc.

I understand that the iconoclasts got a push from Islam of their day (and today as well…See the Taliban!) who allow no images of any kind.

The issue is not the images it’s what is done with them. No Catholic who is squared away would offer any image the worship due to God alone, any more than we would worship the Blessed Virgin (as some misguided individuals allege!). If an individual DID such a thing that is** their** sin and shouldn’t be attributed to the teaching of the Church.
 
40.png
jphilapy:
God didn’t tell Israel to venerate the images nor did the Apostles tell christians to.
Actually, yes God did. Read on some more of the OT. God INSTRUCTED, for example, the Israelties to view a particular image in order to be healed. God instruced IMAGES to be made of cherubim. What God forbade regarding images was for them to be made in such a way as to be idols taking the place he rightfully holds. There’s a big difference.
 
40.png
jphilapy:
Christ did have the bible, he had the old testament scriptures and as a matter of fact he knew them well. /QUOTE]

Christ did NOT have THE BIBLE. He had the Septuagint, which included the Deuterocanonicals, from which he quoted liberally. And paraphrased. But he did NOT have the BIBLE.
 
Church Militant:
No one seems to have touched on the idea that Icons in the form of statues goes all the way back to Moses when God commanded that he make an image of the serpent and lift it up so that those who looked on it would be healed and live. This is also quoted in the NT as a type of Christ who was lifted up for us.

Also it was God himself who commanded that there be 2 images of Cherubim on the top of the Ark of the Covenant and the temple of Solomon had all kinds of art on it’s walls etc.

I understand that the iconoclasts got a push from Islam of their day (and today as well…See the Taliban!) who allow no images of any kind.

The issue is not the images it’s what is done with them. No Catholic who is squared away would offer any image the worship due to God alone, any more than we would worship the Blessed Virgin (as some misguided individuals allege!). If an individual DID such a thing that is** their** sin and shouldn’t be attributed to the teaching of the Church.
YOU, beloved of God, have hit the nail on the head!

I cannot help but add a hearty amen!
 
Hi JPhilapy:

You stated the following as your idea of discipleship:
In otherwords believers should get together in a more intimate setting where they can get to know one another and learn to minister to one another on a consistent basis. I believe that is the most effective enviornment that will help get others involved and disciples them.
It seems you correctly understand the Catholic position on discipleship. Your model imitates every religious order and lay movement within the Holy Catholic Church that I know of, and the Holy Catholic Church has been using this model since Our Lord called the Twelve Apostles. I left protestantism precisely because they lacked this model!

In faith,
Fiat
 
40.png
Fiat:
Hi JPhilapy:

You stated the following as your idea of discipleship:
It seems you correctly understand the Catholic position on discipleship. Your model imitates every religious order and lay movement within the Holy Catholic Church that I know of, and the Holy Catholic Church has been using this model since Our Lord called the Twelve Apostles. I left protestantism precisely because they lacked this model!

In faith,
Fiat
Fiat,

For the record monestarys are much different than what I am meaning. For one they are a specialized group into communal living. I think that all christians are called to be disciples as well as be part of making disciples.

So what is the catholic position on that? And what is “a lay movement”? Does that mean getting up and walking around 😃

Jeff
 
For one they are a specialized group into communal living.
So was the early Apostolic Church. See the first few chapters of Acts.

This is what I’m talking about; we live in a different historical context than the first Christians did.

Concretely, what are some suggestions you have for replicating this in today’s world, and what should the Church do to implement them?
 
For one they are a specialized group into communal living.
So was the early Apostolic Church. See the first few chapters of Acts.

This is what I’m talking about; we live in a different historical context than the first Christians did.

Concretely, what are some suggestions you have for replicating this in today’s world, and what should the Church do to implement them?
 
40.png
DominvsVobiscvm:
So was the early Apostolic Church. See the first few chapters of Acts.

This is what I’m talking about; we live in a different historical context than the first Christians did.

Concretely, what are some suggestions you have for replicating this in today’s world, and what should the Church do to implement them?
Are you saying that not all believers are called to be disciples?

I have been meeting in home fellowships with believers for the last 10 years and it works fine. Also the fellowship I am part of is connected with groups who do the same thing all over the world. But we are not part of a larger institution.

Now there are protestant churches which do home fellowships as a para-organization.

The difference between them and how we do things, is everything they do tends to be centered around bible study or the pastors sermon, whereas we tend to center around a meal, sharing what the Lord is doing in our lives, discussing scripture and several other ways of interacting. I can assure you this has nothing todo with the culture or times.

To replicate? The best thing todo is to understand how believers mutually edify one another and get them in an enviornment where they can start doing that. For example get several believers together around a meal. then later try sharing. There are many ways you can do this, just be creative. Just have to keep in mind that the main premise is to edify one another. That would be the basic explanation. What role your leadership plays in it I can’t say. I just know that there needs to be folks who are mature in Christ who can moderate as well as participate to be part of the gathering.

Jeff
 
40.png
jphilapy:
Fiat,

For the record monestarys are much different than what I am meaning. For one they are a specialized group into communal living. I think that all christians are called to be disciples as well as be part of making disciples.

So what is the catholic position on that? And what is “a lay movement”? Does that mean getting up and walking around 😃

Jeff
  1. The non-monastic study and community group is very much a part of Catholic life. Many third- or lay- orders or private associations of the faithful (all official organizations) have chapters that meet monthy to discuss and to enact their spirituality and their ministry, their discipleship and their apostolate. Prayer and Scripture are usually a central part of these meetings. Other less official groups – small groups within parishes – also engage in group study and prayer. I meet about every six weeks with team mates from a retreat project we do annually in my parish. We are very engaged with one another in a deeply spiritual way – and also meet one another’s material needs. E.g., one of our young members just had a baby, and we organized “meals on wheels” for two weeks to help her get past the tough part of recovering from a c-section while caring for her infant and her older children.
  2. Lay associations: This is how the Code of Canon Law describes them:
Can. 298 §1 In the Church there are associations which are distinct from institutes of consecrated life and societies of apostolic life. In these associations, Christ’s faithful, whether clerics or laity, or clerics and laity together, strive with a common effort to foster a more perfect life, or to promote public worship or christian teaching. They may also devote themselves to other works of the apostolate, such as initiatives for evangelisation, works of piety or charity, and those which animate the temporal order with the christian spirit.
 
40.png
DominvsVobiscvm:
Concretely, what are some suggestions you have for replicating this in today’s world, and what should the Church do to implement them?
It looks like the RC is already doing something to implement what I am talking about. I am not real clear on how they do it except for mercygates postings. I would say that if it is already being done, then trying to encourage folks to participate would be a good way to get all believers involved. But there is only so much you can do.

Thanks mercygate for the info. Is there a website that talks more about the “non-monastic study and community group is very much a part of Catholic life” concept?

Jeff
 
Dear JPhilaphy:
You asked:
Is there a website that talks more about the “non-monastic study and community group is very much a part of Catholic life” concept
You may wish to check out www.opusdei.org. Also, every religious order within the Catholic Church that I know of has some sort of oblature program.

Peace,
Fiat
 
40.png
jphilapy:
It looks like the RC is already doing something to implement what I am talking about.
Actually, some of these organizations of laymen have been functioning for over 700 years! The Rule of life of the Confraternity of Penitents was written by Cardinal Hugolino dei Conti dei Segni in 1221 A.D., at the request of St. Francis of Assisi himself. The lay rule was gradually mitigated by the Franciscan Order over the centuries. In the late 1990s, Secular Franciscans wished to recover the fullness of this rule and revived it. Unfortunately, the Franciscan Order did not grant permission for their members to pledge in the Confraternity of Penitents while remaining Secular Franciscans. However, the Confraternity is attracting members independently of the Franciscan structure.

Our rule of prayer and penance, modified from the 1221 rule to accommodate modern life, was lived in pretty much its present form by Thomas More and by many others who have been beatified or canonized as Saints.

www.penitents.org
 
40.png
mercygate:
Actually, some of these organizations of laymen have been functioning for over 700 years! The Rule of life of the Confraternity of Penitents was written by Cardinal Hugolino dei Conti dei Segni in 1221 A.D., at the request of St. Francis of Assisi himself. The lay rule was gradually mitigated by the Franciscan Order over the centuries. In the late 1990s, Secular Franciscans wished to recover the fullness of this rule and revived it. Unfortunately, the Franciscan Order did not grant permission for their members to pledge in the Confraternity of Penitents while remaining Secular Franciscans. However, the Confraternity is attracting members independently of the Franciscan structure.

Our rule of prayer and penance, modified from the 1221 rule to accommodate modern life, was lived in pretty much its present form by Thomas More and by many others who have been beatified or canonized as Saints.

www.penitents.org
Thanks Mercy. Francis of Assissi, believe it or not, tends to be an inspiriation among believers who meet in homes (autonomosly) because of his desire for relational and simplicty .

Jeff
 
jphilapy http://forums.catholic-questions.org/images/statusicon_cad/user_online.gif vbmenu_register(“postmenu_341093”, true);
Regular Member

jph, I have read your posts and the link. IMHO you have given the Roman Catholic Church and the Othodox Church a politely written slap in the face. You seem to try to say that “they” can’t both be right, but then by insinuation you say both are wrong. Do you realize that you are taking on 2000 years of Tradition, Scripture and the Magesterium? Don’t you think they knew/know what they are doing?

Your Profile is rather blank. Your posts say you go to homes to fellowship. You have no one to interpret Scripture. You have no authority.

Since you have come to a Catholic Site it’s possible that you could learn about Our Faith. You would be welcome.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top