P
PRmerger
Guest
And then when the synod speaks in finality, one must submit to its authority?Then neither did Athanasius, Nikolaos, or Catherine of Sienna.
Read the next sentence, too.![]()
And then when the synod speaks in finality, one must submit to its authority?Then neither did Athanasius, Nikolaos, or Catherine of Sienna.
Read the next sentence, too.![]()
I can never agree with you that the Bible is the source of chaos and confusion unless it is interpreted for us by Rome. That is the Roman Catholic position, is it not?It would prove that the Bible Alone cannot be the source of truth.
It would prove that the Bible Alone is actually the source of chaos and confusion.
Actually, it would. It proves that sola scriptura and private judgment have destroyed the unity of the Church that Jesus prayed for in John 17.And even if there were 30,000 denominations, BenHur, that would prove nothing.
Unless it is interpreted for us by the Faith given once for all to the saints.I can never agree with you that the Bible is the source of chaos and confusion unless it is interpreted for us by Rome.
No. The Catholic position is that the Word of God is transmitted through Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition properly interpreted by the Magisterium of the Church.I can never agree with you that the Bible is the source of chaos and confusion unless it is interpreted for us by Rome. That is the Roman Catholic position, is it not?
If the synod has defended the Faith as professed by the Apostles, recorded in Holy Scripture, and reflected in the Confessions, yes. If not, be like Paul and continue to tell off Peter. Or be like Nick and deck the heretic. Or be like Athanasius and call out the Ariansâs heresy. Or be like Catherine and keep petitioning the Bishop for reform. Or be like Martin and burn a papal bull. Best case scenario, you effect reform; worst case, you request for more hay for your temporal pyre.And then when the synod speaks in finality, one must submit to its authority?
And where does that Faith reside? Where does it come from?Unless it is interpreted for us by the Faith given once for all to the saints.
Faith comes from God through the Church.And where does that Faith reside? Where does it come from?
I donât think Iâve ever seen the words âBible,â âHoly Spirit,â and obscenity used in one sentence together. More to the point, if the Bible and the Holy Spirit are intimately involved, how can obscenity ever be the result?Of course it is.
Itâs the idea that all you need is the unholy trinity of me, the Bible and the Holy Spirit that leads to this obscenity of tens of thousands of Christian denominations.
Itâs when someone says, âI donât need a magisterium to tell me what to believeâ that one gets this monstrosity.
Well, that leaves every single Lutheran with the exit possibility, just like Fr. Martin used.If the synod has defended the Faith as professed by the Apostles, recorded in Holy Scripture, and reflected in the Confessions, yes. If not, be like Paul and continue to tell off Peter. Or be like Nick and deck the heretic. Or be like Athanasius and call out the Ariansâs heresy. Or be like Catherine and keep petitioning the Bishop for reform. Or be like Martin and burn a papal bull. Best case scenario, you effect reform; worst case, you request for more hay for your temporal pyre.
First, Satan quoted scripture, so just referencing a Bible is no guarantee of holiness.More to the point, if the Bible and the Holy Spirit are intimately involved, how can obscenity ever be the result?
Wow, sorry, canât go there.âFor by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God,â (Ephesians 2:8). No mention is made here of the RCC- or any other denomination, for that matter.Faith comes from God through the Church.
Thatâs exactly right, Faithdancer. Exactly right.I donât think Iâve ever seen the words âBible,â âHoly Spirit,â and obscenity used in one sentence together. More to the point, if the Bible and the Holy Spirit are intimately involved, how can obscenity ever be the result?
This is well known, but I think it is a non-sequitur in this context.First, Satan quoted scripture, so just referentrcing a Bible is no guarantee of holiness.
But the original reference to the Holy Spirit, by PRMerger, said nothing about âclaim.â Neither did I. The simple question remains: if the Holy Spirit and Holy Scripture are intimately involved, how can obscenity be the result?Second, everyone claims to be led by the Spirit into all truth, but people hold contradictory positions.
Should infants be baptized? Some say yes; other say no. All claim to be basing their positions of Scripture and the Holy Spirit.
So, the problem is not the Holy Spirit; the problem is people claiming guidance from the Spirit as justification for following their own inclinations.
First, I acknowledge that the source of Faith is God.Wow, sorry, canât go there.âFor by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God,â (Ephesians 2:8). No mention is made here of the RCC- or any other denomination, for that matter.
Who would tell that person about Jesus?If there were suddenly only one person left alive on Earth, for whatever reason, I believe that one person would only have to repent, to believe in Jesus Christ and to have faith in Him as Lord and Savior, to be saved. No other intermediary would be required,
ExceptâŚWow, sorry, canât go there.âFor by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God,â (Ephesians 2:8). No mention is made here of the RCC- or any other denomination, for that matter.![]()
The logical conclusion is: your claim to have the Holy Spirit guiding you to depart from the Catholic Faith isnât actually a true claim. The Holy Spirit didnât guide you. You guided yourself.The simple question remains: if the Holy Spirit and Holy Scripture are intimately involved, how can obscenity be the result?
Once again, the number of Christian denominations proves nothing. Neither does the supposed monolithicity of the Roman Catholic Church, with its leadership of âprinces,â prove that all other Christian denominations are false.Thatâs exactly right, Faithdancer. Exactly right.
The Holy Spirit does not lead you to chaos and confusion. It does not generate tens of thousands of denominations.
There are numerous conclusions to be drawn from the obscenity of these denominations.
To wit: the Holy Spirit isnât actually guiding you when you read the Bible and personally interpret it contrary to the Faith given once for all.
A magisterium is needed to guide the faithful, as the faithful are fallible, and will therefore be destined to erroneously interpret the Scriptures.
âMe, the Holy Spirit and my Bibleâ doesnât work. It is exactly what the Enemy hoped for.
It proves that without a magisterium to guide oneâs interpretation of the Bible, chaos and confusion results.Once again, the number of Christian denominations proves nothing.