Which Church??

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jubilarian
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

Jubilarian

Guest
If you go on line you will see all kinds of Protestants stating the the Catholic Church is not the true Church. Which Church do Protestants align themselves with? One Protestant web site says that1 Tim. 3:15 (the Church is the pillar of truth) means Christianity as a whole.That can’t be so because there needs to be consistency of truth, and mega denominations dont lend themselves to that. What is the Protestant “church?”
 
If you go on line you will see all kinds of Protestants stating the the Catholic Church is not the true Church. Which Church do Protestants align themselves with? One Protestant web site says that1 Tim. 3:15 (the Church is the pillar of truth) means Christianity as a whole.That can’t be so because there needs to be consistency of truth, and mega denominations dont lend themselves to that. What is the Protestant “church?”
It literally depends on which type of non-Catholic you are speaking with, but in general, Protestants will say that the Church promised by Christ (cf. Mt. 16:18-19) is not a visible Church but an invisible communion of all believers regardless of denomination, doctrine or creed.

For this group, no one denomination has all the truth, and that’s not really a problem as long as they agree on the “essentials” - a non-biblical concept that has been devised by man to paper over the divisions that exist among people who claim to be “rightly dividing” the Word of God yet coming up with different interpretations.
 
As a former Fundamentalist , I would often hear about “agreeing on the essentials”, however, many essentials were not agreed upon in Protestantism, including salvation. If Protestants think all of Chritendom is the church, I guess that doesn’t mean Catholicism.
 
The majority of Protestants basically divorce the Mystical Body of Christ from the Physical Body of Christ (aka the Church).

To Catholics (and Orthodox) you simply cannot do this because we believe that the Church safe guards the Deposit of Faith and Sacred Tradition.

But since Protestants believe in Bible Only, they don’t think they need the Church to protect the Deposit of Faith because The Holy Spirit will do that. But then why do we have over 30,000 Protestant denominations today? In response to this fact, many Protestants believe that Christian Unity in regards to “denominations” is a “nice to have” but not a requirement and that the Bible is the only Deposit of Faith.

I recommend reading The Protestant’s Dilemma by Devon Rose (shop.catholic.com/books-1/apologetics/the-protestant-s-dilemma.html)

I also recommend the following by Dave Armstrong:
There are many other books too. But I think these are a good overview.

I hope this is helpful.
 
The majority of Protestants basically divorce the Mystical Body of Christ from the Physical Body of Christ (aka the Church).
Don’t think they do.
But since Protestants believe in Bible Only, they don’t think they need the Church to protect the Deposit of Faith because The Holy Spirit will do that.
Don’t think this is accurate either.
But then why do we have over 30,000 Protestant denominations today?
There are not 30,000 denominations today. This is propaganda like P’s who say C’s killed millions during inquisition and other moves.
 
Hi Jubi,
As a former Fundamentalist , I would often hear about “agreeing on the essentials”, however, many essentials were not agreed upon in Protestantism, including salvation. If Protestants think all of Chritendom is the church, I guess that doesn’t mean Catholicism.
I agree, but actually I think it is even worse than that. While Protestants cannot agree on what is the correct doctrine on many, many “essential” issues, in reality they cannot agree even on which issues are ‘essential’ and which are not. If you would like to see this demonstrated just ask a few different Protestants for an actual list of the issues they think are ‘essential’ to the faith.

I have tried this and just getting an answer as to how many essential issues there are is pretty tough.

In this as with many other issues though the proof is in the puddin. If you won’t commune with others, then you are, by definition, separated on a matter that is ‘essential’ (at least to you).

God Bless You Jubi, Topper
 
It literally depends on which type of non-Catholic you are speaking with, but in general, Protestants will say that the Church promised by Christ (cf. Mt. 16:18-19) is not a visible Church but an invisible communion of all believers regardless of denomination, doctrine or creed.
Yes and no. How can a “communion” of believers and as some say , those on earth (as opposed to heavenly) be invisible ? Even the CC could be said says the same thing. She is guided (invisibly) by the Holy Spirit. Have not seen of any visible doves or cloves of fire or heavenly voices attending prophesying leaders since Acts (hence His invisible workings).
For this group, no one denomination has all the truth, and that’s not really a problem as long as they agree on the “essentials” - a non-biblical concept that has been devised by man to paper over the divisions that exist among people who claim to be “rightly dividing” the Word of God yet coming up with different interpretations.
It is interesting the CC on one hand says she is fullness of truth yet admits she does not have "all’’ the answers. Not all things are “set” in CC, and some things are still open to different interpretations. The Church has always had some things as "essential’’ and unmoveable, but not all. The Pope is only one step ahead of consensus when speaking ex cathedra.
 
I have tried this and just getting an answer as to how many essential issues there are is pretty tough.
Choose your own stumbling block. Of course it would be nice for all to be perfect catechists.
In this as with many other issues though the proof is in the puddin
Amen. The second vatican finally recognized these other 30,000 churches as containing “salvation and grace”. Of course CC takes credit for this, yet the fact is saints across full spectrum of denominations, including CC, will gain entrance into heaven with rewards, based according to His good graces to the individual saint, and not "affiliation’’. It is in the pudding as you correctly say. Some Catholic pudding is better than P pudding and vice versa. It is an individual thing for we are all His workmanship. He be the cook. So which “church” might be important, and it might not be. The Lord definitely has more choices now on where to water His sheep. May the world recognize our good works not as C or P but as His followers.
If you won’t commune with others, then you are, by definition, separated on a matter that is ‘essential’ (at least to you).
All churches, even CC, has criteria for not communing with others.
 
Yes and no. How can a “communion” of believers and as some say , those on earth (as opposed to heavenly) be invisible ?
The argument is that “only God knows” who is in the Church and who isn’t. Consequently, because it has no one visible organizational structure and no single visible head (as in Catholicism) the Church is “invisible”.
Even the CC could be said says the same thing. She is guided (invisibly) by the Holy Spirit. Have not seen of any visible doves or cloves of fire or heavenly voices attending prophesying leaders since Acts (hence His invisible workings).
But in this case, the Church IS visible; it is the Spirit who is invisible.
It is interesting the CC on one hand says she is fullness of truth yet admits she does not have "all’’ the answers. Not all things are “set” in CC, and some things are still open to different interpretations. The Church has always had some things as "essential’’ and unmoveable, but not all. The Pope is only one step ahead of consensus when speaking ex cathedra.
When we say that Catholicism is the fullness of truth, we mean that there is no revealed truth that Catholicism has - not that we have ALL the answers. All truth found is Protestant churches, for example, is a subset of the truth of Catholicism. The only thing that Protestants have that Catholics don’t have is doctrines that the believe to be true but are actually false.

Protestants have a subset of the total known revelation of God. Here is a diagram:

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

All that may be known about God is U (extending infinitely in all directions). The Catholic Church knows B which represents the total extent of public revelation. Non-Catholic denominations are represented by A, and A will be of varying sizes depending on which non-Catholic group is being considered. A would be large for Orthodoxy and much smaller for Mormonism, for example.

There is no known truth about God that the Catholic Church does not have; therefore, no part of A is represented outside of B.
 
The Pentecostal church I grew up in used the label “Apostolic” in regards to itself, and believed that the early church, consisting of the apostles, disciples, and all who converted, believes exactly what they believe today. To them, the Church isn’t an institution itself; it can be created ex nihilo, wherever the Holy Spirit (“Holy Ghost”, in that circle) decides to move. For them, the Azusa Street revival was a rebirth of the church. Their attitude is that throughout all of human history, there has only been an infinitesimally small amount of people who are saved (by the Pentecostal way – baptism in Jesus’ name, full immersion, speaking in tongues, adhering to certain dress/grooming codes, etc), especially during after Paul and before Azusa. To them, the Catholic church and all of the various Protestant denominations are just man-made organizations that were instituted after “the church” came into being.

(Honestly, I don’t even know if they’re aware of the Eastern and Oriental Orthodox churches…)
 
Protestants have a subset of the total known revelation of God. Here is a diagram:

http://www2.lv.psu.edu/ojj-rcm27/images/100subset.gif

All that may be known about God is U (extending infinitely in all directions). The Catholic Church knows B which represents the total extent of public revelation. Non-Catholic denominations are represented by A, and A will be of varying sizes depending on which non-Catholic group is being considered. A would be large for Orthodoxy and much smaller for Mormonism, for example.

There is no known truth about God that the Catholic Church does not have; therefore, no part of A is represented outside of B.
I quite agree with your diagram.

Yet I wonder whether knowledge of “B” versus “A” is necessary for salvation. Who could know it all, anyway? Except yourself, of course. 😃
 
There are not 30,000 denominations today. This is propaganda like P’s who say C’s killed millions during inquisition and other moves.
Ben-

I have been involved in these discussion for years. I even went to the publisher’s office here in Cary, NC to see the books which give that number with my own eyes.

Now, you can take issue with the number being 30,000, but you can’t really deny that the true number is huge. Crazy huge. And it’s a far cry from the One that Jesus promised to build.
 
There are not 30,000 denominations today. .
The number of 30,000 (which I just heard is now closer to 35,000) is pretty accurate because every single “non-denominational” church is counted as it’s own denomination. They are a denomination of one community.

Of course if you count up the number of communions, groups, etc, there are far less. But it’s true that the number of different “authorities” has exploded.

Look how many Baptist denominations exist… Southern Baptist, Liberty Baptist, American Baptist, etc.

This list has over 300 Baptist denominations alone on it, and I’m sure this list isn’t complete:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Baptist_denominations
 
If you go on line you will see all kinds of Protestants stating the the Catholic Church is not the true Church. Which Church do Protestants align themselves with? One Protestant web site says that1 Tim. 3:15 (the Church is the pillar of truth) means Christianity as a whole.That can’t be so because there needs to be consistency of truth, and mega denominations dont lend themselves to that. What is the Protestant “church?”
There is no such church as “The Protestant Church”. The term protestant comes from the 1529 2nd Diet at Speyer, where, briefly, the practice of religious activities which was approved at the first Diet of Speyer were being rescinded. The non-Catholics there offered a formal “protest”, hence the term protestant.

From the perspectice of my tradition, the Church is the congregation of believers, where the word is preached and the sacraments administered. From that perspective, the Catholic Church is indeed part of the Church. As are we.

Jon
 
Choose your own stumbling block. Of course it would be nice for all to be perfect catechists.

Amen. The second vatican finally recognized these other 30,000 churches as containing “salvation and grace”. Of course CC takes credit for this, yet the fact is saints across full spectrum of denominations, including CC, will gain entrance into heaven with rewards, based according to His good graces to the individual saint, and not "affiliation’’. It is in the pudding as you correctly say. Some Catholic pudding is better than P pudding and vice versa. It is an individual thing for we are all His workmanship. He be the cook. So which “church” might be important, and it might not be. The Lord definitely has more choices now on where to water His sheep. May the world recognize our good works not as C or P but as His followers. All churches, even CC, has criteria for not communing with others.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top