C
CJeplin
Guest
My oldest brother is gay. Everyone knows this. Though the family never speaks of it directly and tends to treat it as the proverbial “elephant in the room” whenever there are gatherings, it has led me to wonder about some of the things the Church teaches and how we should interpret these with regard to direct dealings with my brother.
While I totally understand and uphold the Church’s views that there is no moral justification for homosexual acts, that due to their being intrinsically disordered can in no way be approved of, the question I have is that the Church also mentions that there is a distinction to be drawn between most who engage in homosexual practices and those who are “incurable.” According to the Declaration on Certain Questions Concerning Sexual Ethics some homosexuals are such due to innate instinct or pathology as the governing factor.
While even in these situations the Church teaches that these can never be approved of or be morally justified, I wonder if such are considered equally condemned since they are the result of a pathology. And if it is due to a pathology how can it still be immoral? What other cases other than homosexuality can I use to show that a pathological basis can call for no moral justification for others? Any thoughts?
The other question is how can one decipher if a pathology is involved, how the Church has or determines such things, and how this can help us either excuse or accuse (so to speak) persons like my brother (or used by my brother himself in dealing with his own sexuality)? Some are bound to be very judgmental towards him in our family, but if no one speaks up about it how can we realize how far we can and should help, if at all?
While I totally understand and uphold the Church’s views that there is no moral justification for homosexual acts, that due to their being intrinsically disordered can in no way be approved of, the question I have is that the Church also mentions that there is a distinction to be drawn between most who engage in homosexual practices and those who are “incurable.” According to the Declaration on Certain Questions Concerning Sexual Ethics some homosexuals are such due to innate instinct or pathology as the governing factor.
While even in these situations the Church teaches that these can never be approved of or be morally justified, I wonder if such are considered equally condemned since they are the result of a pathology. And if it is due to a pathology how can it still be immoral? What other cases other than homosexuality can I use to show that a pathological basis can call for no moral justification for others? Any thoughts?
The other question is how can one decipher if a pathology is involved, how the Church has or determines such things, and how this can help us either excuse or accuse (so to speak) persons like my brother (or used by my brother himself in dealing with his own sexuality)? Some are bound to be very judgmental towards him in our family, but if no one speaks up about it how can we realize how far we can and should help, if at all?