I’m a little loopy from medication to bear with me here:
One thing that bothers me about this conversation is it seems to focus on large government. .
What if we changed the focus of social programs to local government…city or county (depending on population). Does it alter anyone’s stance…particuarly those (of us) who are resistant to government social programs.
For my part, my stance does change a bit. I am opposed to most things the federal government does. Most of the things the federal government has its fingers in is best left to more local government…the state…and even more so-counties, cities, neighborhoods (depending on population levels).
I think that the local population would be able to serve the needy of its community far better and more efficiently than the federal or even state government. Furthermore, I think that the local population would be more willing to pay more taxes or give more if they see their money stay in their communities and they have a say in the matter.