S
Serap
Guest
I have read on CAF that some Potestant denominations support abortion. Which ones are they?
Well, that’s a pretty tall order, considering that there are literally thousands of Protestant denominations. (Actually, there is but one Church, the Catholic Church. Protestants have denominations (the word comes from the Greek and means “from the name of”).I have read on CAF that some Potestant denominations support abortion. Which ones are they?
I have read on CAF that some Potestant denominations support abortion. Which ones are they?
The LCMS is opposed to abortion.I have read on CAF that some Potestant denominations support abortion. Which ones are they?
Well, that’s a pretty tall order, considering that there are literally thousands of Protestant denominations. (Actually, there is but one Church, the Catholic Church. Protestants have denominations (the word comes from the Greek and means “from the name of”).
All who are validly baptized are members of the Catholic Church. Protestants, unfortunately, are not in communion with the Church, which of course, is against the will of God. Jesus said He wished that we were all one. Not thousands.
Actually, the Catholic Church is not a “denomination” since the word “denomination” comes from the Greek and means, basically, “from the name of.”
There is one Church, of which history shows Catholicism is one of the many denominations, regardless of their preferred labeling [a rose, by any other name . . .].
The Church is constitued by those who believe, as Peter in Mark 8:29.
Protestants are against the will of God?
Well, history clearly evidences otherwise.
As a Catholic, I am sure you spurn everything I say; but, God loves you anyway.
![]()
I think to characterize Southern Baptists as ever having been pro-abortion is incorrect. The absolutely most liberal position the convention has ever adopted was that abortion could be a possibility in very extreme cases (see below). Currently the only time the SBC think abortions should be an option are in order to save the mother’s life.Southern Baptists have been pro-abortion but have become more pro-life in recent years.
Resolution On Abortion
June 1971
WHEREAS, Christians in the American society today are faced with difficult decisions about abortion; and
WHEREAS, Some advocate that there be no abortion legislation, thus making the decision a purely private matter between a woman and her doctor; and
WHEREAS, Others advocate no legal abortion, or would permit abortion only if the life of the mother is threatened;
Therefore, be it RESOLVED, that this Convention express the belief that society has a responsibility to affirm through the laws of the state a high view of the sanctity of human life, including fetal life, in order to protect those who cannot protect themselves; and
Be it further RESOLVED, That we call upon Southern Baptists to work for legislation that will allow the possibility of abortion under such conditions as rape, incest, clear evidence of severe fetal deformity, and carefully ascertained evidence of the likelihood of damage to the emotional, mental, and physical health of the mother
That being the case, it still indicates a severe conceptual flaw. If the unborn is, in fact, a human being, there is no circumstance under which the unborn’s right to life is subordinant to any other human’s right to life. In other words, there is never a justification for killing an innocent even to save another human’s life.I think to characterize Southern Baptists as ever having been pro-abortion is incorrect. The absolutely most liberal position the convention has ever adopted was that abortion could be a possibility in very extreme cases (see below). Currently the only time the SBC think abortions should be an option are in order to save the mother’s life.
However, many don’t share your belief. I hold the same belief as you, but it’s very complicated.That being the case, it still indicates a severe conceptual flaw. If the unborn is, in fact, a human being, there is no circumstance under which the unborn’s right to life is subordinant to any other human’s right to life. In other words, there is never a justification for killing an innocent even to save another human’s life.
To propose otherwise is to, essentially, deny the whole premise of “life begins at conception”.
Our Church gives us a great example to follow on this matter. Love everyone, but never sacrifice your principals.Or if I knew a husband and wife who had an abortion so that the wife could live, I cannot openly accuse them of murder either. They are already going through enough turmoil. We need to be kind and empathetic to people going through these situations.
Standing outside an abortion clinic saying “MURDER” is only going to make others think I am a lunatic. They will just write me off as a crazy person.
It’s very complicated. We cannot condem, we can only educate with kindness and empathy the best we can.
I don’t think any Protestant would dream of claiming that his denomination is in any way equivalent to the Catholic Church (of which he is a full member).(Actually, there is but one Church, the Catholic Church. Protestants have denominations (the word comes from the Greek and means “from the name of”).
The mother is not an innocent human life worth saving?In other words, there is never a justification for killing an innocent even to save another human’s life.
She is indeed worth saving, anything short of killing another person to do so would be appropriate.The mother is not an innocent human life worth saving?
Hey, this is not nice. Matt is just seeing two sides of the coin.She is indeed worth saving, anything short of killing another person to do so would be appropriate.
If you disagree what do your base the theory of hierarchy of human worth upon? In other words, who has the authority to say one human life is worth less than another?
Unfortunately we are forced to make that choice regardless if only one life can be saved. Its not really that one is less than the other, but rather a painful and difficult choice that must be made. If its my wife and child, you better believe I am going to tell them do everything they can to save both.She is indeed worth saving, anything short of killing another person to do so would be appropriate.
If you disagree what do your base the theory of hierarchy of human worth upon? In other words, who has the authority to say one human life is worth less than another?