Which religion goes to church the most?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JustaServant
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Isn’t not attending Mass a mortal sin in the CC?
Catechism of the Catholic Church 2042: “The first precept [of the Catholic church] (“You shall attend Mass on Sundays and holy days of obligation.”) requires the faithful to participate in the Eucharistic celebration when the Christian community gathers together on the day commemorating the Resurrection of the Lord.” 🙂
 
…just high-tailing it out of there as quickly as they possibly can so they can beat the Baptists to the best restaurants.
I’ve often wondered about this.
Places like Chick-fil-A‎, owned by evangelicals, close on Sundays because they do not believe in working on the Lord’s Day.
Yet these SAME people rush to the Golden Corral buffet to be served by people who DO work on Sundays. 😃
 
That does not surprise me. I used to be a Mormon. If you stop going to Church, they will send people to see you to find out why and try to bring you back. They do a number of things to reach out to people. They focus highly on faith formation, too, although they call it seminary. High School students are expected to attend seminary every day before school starts, where they are taught the OT, NT, BoM/D&C. And all males are expected to do a mission after high school, and women are encouraged to.

Now clearly I no longer believe their religious beliefs are correct, but they could teach other Christians quite a lot about keeping people active in the faith and growing the faith worldwide.
I believe it isn’t so much about “faith formation” as it is about keeping the LDS from falling apart. With access to information regarding the lack of truth of their teachings many LDS are leaving the church. When attempting to bring in converts they don’t tell the whole story, just enough of the good stuff to get them in.

You went through RCIA, how does that compare as far as faith formation? I went through RCIA also but was never LDS so I can’t make the comparison.
 
That does not surprise me. I used to be a Mormon. If you stop going to Church, they will send people to see you to find out why and try to bring you back. They do a number of things to reach out to people. They focus highly on faith formation, too, although they call it seminary. High School students are expected to attend seminary every day before school starts, where they are taught the OT, NT, BoM/D&C. And all males are expected to do a mission after high school, and women are encouraged to.

Now clearly I no longer believe their religious beliefs are correct, but they could teach other Christians quite a lot about keeping people active in the faith and growing the faith worldwide.
I agree with you as well. We Catholics can learn a lot from our brothers and sisters. 👍
 
I’ve often wondered about this.
Places like Chick-fil-A‎, owned by evangelicals, close on Sundays because they do not believe in working on the Lord’s Day.
Yet these SAME people rush to the Golden Corral buffet to be served by people who DO work on Sundays. 😃
Another way to look at “keep the Sabbath” is to make everything you do an action in remembrance of God. Some Catholics/Christians work during the Sabbath; doesn’t make them any less observant if they keep God in mind as they go about work. 👍
 
I wouldn’t exactly call that a church if they don’t even believe in God.
It’s a Christian Church, but a very liberal one. Unitarian or something. Belief in God isn’t a requirement to be a member. It’s a mega-church out in town that I guess a lot of people have begun going to.

Personally I’m just happy she’s started going to church. My hope is that she will feel the Spirit working in her life and come to Christ. I think she’s got a better chance of that being a member of any Christian church than not going to church at all.
 
I know quite a few Atheists who attend church regularly. They think it’s good to have a stable, repetitive, weekly activity for their children to participate in. So they attend a local UU congregation. UU. It’s church for people who don’t, you know… church.
I have one of those churches up the street from where I live.

Their tag line is literally, “Church for people who don’t ‘do’ church.”

They have a great coffee bar and free too. I stopped there once for a free cup on my way home from Mass. They looked at me weird because I was wearing a jacket and tie. I was just like, “ahite… thanks!” 😃

-Tim-
 
I believe it isn’t so much about “faith formation” as it is about keeping the LDS from falling apart. With access to information regarding the lack of truth of their teachings many LDS are leaving the church. When attempting to bring in converts they don’t tell the whole story, just enough of the good stuff to get them in.
This is true to a point. They had me read the entire Book of Mormon and if I felt it was true basically I was in, they baptized me. While I now believe the BoM to be a fabrication (mostly- some of it is plagiarized, such as 2 Nephi which has great portions of the Book of Isaiah plagiarized into it) at the time I believe in it. And I think most LDS firmly believe that what they are taught is the truth. They do believe there is archaeological evidence which backs up their claims, the same as there is for the Bible, when the reality is there is not any archaeological evidence to back up the BoM and in fact the lack of evidence refutes the truth of the BoM. But most of them don’t know that, and are taught the exact opposite. I learned a lot when I started reading exmormon.org about how bamboozled I had been.
You went through RCIA, how does that compare as far as faith formation? I went through RCIA also but was never LDS so I can’t make the comparison.
I loved RCIA but it’s hard to compare the two. LDS focuses on the scriptures in seminary (one year is OT, one is NT, etc) and not so much on what they believe although it is touched on and probably is significantly covered when the go over Doctrine and Covenants (I left the church before that seminary year). But LDS seminaryis a 1 hour class every weekday during the school year, and that is significant- 5 hours a week vs. the about 1-1/2 hr RCIA class once a week. But RCIA focused more on what we, as Catholics, believe. Bible study is separate. I think that is really important though- had I truly understood what it is Mormons believe, I probably would never have joined the church. I do think RCIA could be more comprehensive, however. For example, what we never learned in RCIA was what you do after you’re baptized/confirmed. We did have one class on the Rosary/Chaplets but we never went over Adoration, or Scapulars, or Consecration (as a layperson), or different ways to serve your Parish or community, or any of the other myriad things that Catholics participate in to deepen their faith and come closer to Christ and live the Gospel. I guess we were supposed to have something called “Mystagogia” which was to learn more after RCIA was over, but our Faith Formation leader became a Permanent Deacon right after RCIA wrapped up and he just got too busy I guess.
 
A couple observations about this:
  1. The immediate source is Deseret News, which is owned and operated by the LDS Church itself. I don’t find it at all surprising that they have yet another “article” that seemingly serves no other purpose than to stroke Mormon egos and let the rank and file LDS know that “all is well in Zion!”
  2. The cited source within Deseret News is Dadaviz. Clicking the link to the original site shows a hodgepodge of unrelated charts and graphs, all of which lack proper citation. Where did these data come from? What was the methodology of data acquisition? We have no way of knowing.
  3. As a former member of various LDS ward and stake hierarchies in which capacities I had access to actual LDS member statistics and retention rates, I say the 75% value is a steaming pile of cow manure. At any given time the number of families on the rolls versus those who attended Sunday services would bounce between 30%-45%. Even if we were to exclude members of the LDS Church who likely don’t consider themselves Mormon any longer, it wouldn’t come close to 75%. There are quite a few “Jack Mormons” who will have the missionaries over for dinner, donate to the fast offering, and possibly even tithe from time to time, but do not frequently attend Sacrament meeting on Sunday, and these people very much consider themselves “Mormon”.
75% of Mormon’s go to Church because those who don’t get kicked out and are no longer Mormon.

The Catholic Church could have 100% attendance if we had a role call or punch clock and excommunicated those who didn’t show up for a few weeks.

Mormon’s don’t want those who don’t attend regularly. We are supposed to be different. The idea is to welcome them, not throw them out.

-Tim-
This is utter nonsense.
  1. The LDS do not excommunicate members for absenteeism.
  2. For you to say “Mormons don’t want those who don’t attend regularly” tells me you likely know very few Mormons. There is constant focus on reaching out to the inactive in the hopes that they will become active again. So much so that Mormons have gotten the reputation of “love bombing” those who haven’t been seen in a number of weeks.
 
I loved RCIA but it’s hard to compare the two. LDS focuses on the scriptures in seminary (one year is OT, one is NT, etc) and not so much on what they believe although it is touched on and probably is significantly covered when the go over Doctrine and Covenants (I left the church before that seminary year). But LDS seminaryis a 1 hour class every weekday during the school year, and that is significant- 5 hours a week vs. the about 1-1/2 hr RCIA class once a week. But RCIA focused more on what we, as Catholics, believe. Bible study is separate. I think that is really important though- had I truly understood what it is Mormons believe, I probably would never have joined the church. I do think RCIA could be more comprehensive, however. For example, what we never learned in RCIA was what you do after you’re baptized/confirmed. We did have one class on the Rosary/Chaplets but we never went over Adoration, or Scapulars, or Consecration (as a layperson), or different ways to serve your Parish or community, or any of the other myriad things that Catholics participate in to deepen their faith and come closer to Christ and live the Gospel. I guess we were supposed to have something called “Mystagogia” which was to learn more after RCIA was over, but our Faith Formation leader became a Permanent Deacon right after RCIA wrapped up and he just got too busy I guess.
I think Horton was asking about your experience of RCIA vis. a vis. the LDS Missionary discussions (if we are to compare apples to apples). LDS Seminary isn’t analogous to RCIA. RCIA is a class for non-Catholic (actually non-Christians) who are interested in converting to Catholicism. LDS Seminary is for already Mormon high school students, the majority of whom come from long LDS families and haven’t made a truly voluntary, fully informed decision to follow Mormonism. It would be more similar to a Catholic Confirmation class. When we compare the faith formation of RCIA versus the LDS missionary discussions, RCIA wins hands down. A minimum of 9 months of classroom instruction before conversion on the one hand, and two casual conversations before being asked to be baptized LDS on the other hand.
 
It’s a Christian Church, but a very liberal one. Unitarian or something. Belief in God isn’t a requirement to be a member. It’s a mega-church out in town that I guess a lot of people have begun going to.

Personally I’m just happy she’s started going to church. My hope is that she will feel the Spirit working in her life and come to Christ. I think she’s got a better chance of that being a member of any Christian church than not going to church at all.
Agreed. Baby steps are still steps towards God. Was watching a film titled “From Saul to Paul” on YouTube the other night. There’s a scene where the early catholic church leaders were divided on the topic of Mosaic Law: should the Gentiles be required to circumcise before joining the Jewish Christian church? No, each culture experiences God and His message in their own way. Still true today. Though our Protestant brothers and sisters may not worship as we do, they still worship God and His Only Son Christ Jesus. Keep the faith!
 
I think Horton was asking about your experience of RCIA vis. a vis. the LDS Missionary discussions (if we are to compare apples to apples). LDS Seminary isn’t analogous to RCIA. RCIA is a class for non-Catholic (actually non-Christians) who are interested in converting to Catholicism. LDS Seminary is for already Mormon high school students, the majority of whom come from long LDS families and haven’t made a truly voluntary, fully informed decision to follow Mormonism. It would be more similar to a Catholic Confirmation class. When we compare the faith formation of RCIA versus the LDS missionary discussions, RCIA wins hands down. A minimum of 9 months of classroom instruction before conversion on the one hand, and two casual conversations before being asked to be baptized LDS on the other hand.
Ah. Yes, I would agree with that. I think my conversion process with the Mormons was about 3 months but that was more to do with they wanted me to read the BoM and give my testimony that I believed it was true. It took a bit for me to work my way through the BoM, but once I did and gave my testimony that was all it took. They baptized me. There were a number of things I didn’t realize that the Mormons believed. For example, while I was aware that they believed there were different levels of Heaven and that if you made it to the Celestial kingdom you could become a God yourself, I had no idea they thought God used to be a man too. Stuff like that. It also felt to me like they relegated women to second class citizens that were expected to bake and can food and have babies. I’m not a feminist, but it just seemed to be a really obvious lack of equality.
 
I do think RCIA could be more comprehensive, however. For example, what we never learned in RCIA was what you do after you’re baptized/confirmed. We did have one class on the Rosary/Chaplets but we never went over Adoration, or Scapulars, or Consecration (as a layperson), or different ways to serve your Parish or community, or any of the other myriad things that Catholics participate in to deepen their faith and come closer to Christ and live the Gospel. I guess we were supposed to have something called “Mystagogia” which was to learn more after RCIA was over, but our Faith Formation leader became a Permanent Deacon right after RCIA wrapped up and he just got too busy I guess.
It’s too bad the Mystagogia part was left out. I’ve been part of RCIA in two different parishes and those last 4-5 classes were really stressed as important as the rest. Unfortunately many stop attending after the Easter Vigil.

I hope you have found a way to remain engaged in your parish.
 
It is disappointing to see Catholicism not toward the top, but I was surprised to see the stat about Judaism. I was surprised to see that only 19% of the Jewish faith attend services regularly.
Its my understanding that real faith amongst the Jewish population has grown despairingly weak.
 
…There is constant focus on reaching out to the inactive in the hopes that they will become active again. So much so that Mormons have gotten the reputation of “love bombing” those who haven’t been seen in a number of weeks.
I used to be on a team of church members who visited members of our local congregation who hadn’t attended in awhile. I found that most had either encountered health issues or quit attending because they thought nobody cared about them.

A good number of the latter group returned after we showed them God’s love and just stayed and genuinely chatted with them for awhile or did minor things like replacing a battery in a smoke detector or mowing their yard or some other minor repair that mattered a lot to them to show them God’s love in a practical way.

A few folks would tell me to take a hike when we came to the door and didn’t want anything to do with church anymore, probably thinking we had ulterior motives for visiting, which I didn’t. I just thought it would be a nice way to meet new folks and represent my congregation. For those, I prayed that the Lord would meet them where they were at and minister to them and help bring them peace and healing in whatever problems they had.

I think more local churches should visit the people on their rolls and maybe that would help get them to return to the fold. I assume many other faith traditions have visitation teams who also do this sort of thing, also.
 
A couple observations about this:
  1. The immediate source is Deseret News, which is owned and operated by the LDS Church itself. I don’t find it at all surprising that they have yet another “article” that seemingly serves no other purpose than to stroke Mormon egos and let the rank and file LDS know that “all is well in Zion!”
  2. The cited source within Deseret News is Dadaviz. Clicking the link to the original site shows a hodgepodge of unrelated charts and graphs, all of which lack proper citation. Where did these data come from? What was the methodology of data acquisition? We have no way of knowing.
See my previous post - the article itself was using data from the Pew Research Center. Perfectly respectable data and report. Deseret News was just doing a piece on the information.

pewforum.org/2015/05/12/americas-changing-religious-landscape/
 
75% of what? How many people in the PEW poll self-identified as Mormon? 50? 100? 200? 500?

I would like to see the actual numbers. Not just the percentages.
 
I used to be on a team of church members who visited members of our local congregation who hadn’t attended in awhile. I found that most had either encountered health issues or quit attending because they thought nobody cared about them.

A good number of the latter group returned after we showed them God’s love and just stayed and genuinely chatted with them for awhile or did minor things like replacing a battery in a smoke detector or mowing their yard or some other minor repair that mattered a lot to them to show them God’s love in a practical way.

A few folks would tell me to take a hike when we came to the door and didn’t want anything to do with church anymore, probably thinking we had ulterior motives for visiting, which I didn’t. I just thought it would be a nice way to meet new folks and represent my congregation. For those, I prayed that the Lord would meet them where they were at and minister to them and help bring them peace and healing in whatever problems they had.

I think more local churches should visit the people on their rolls and maybe that would help get them to return to the fold. I assume many other faith traditions have visitation teams who do this sort of thing, also.
 
See my previous post - the article itself was using data from the Pew Research Center. Perfectly respectable data and report. Deseret News was just doing a piece on the information.

pewforum.org/2015/05/12/americas-changing-religious-landscape/
That is a ginormous report. Could you please point out the relevant information, specifically anything that addresses weekly attendance? All I was able to see from a cursory scan of that page is that it only deals with population demographics.

Edit: Furthermore I searched for the words “weekly” and “attend” and there were zero results. I don’t think Deseret News had this Pew Forum report in mind, otherwise they would’ve actually cited Pew rather than the unattributed chart which itself lacked a citation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top