B
BartholomewB
Guest
It doesn’t give any sources.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
A
Agathon
Guest
B
BartholomewB
Guest
I had never heard of “Pseudo-Hippolytus” until now. Is he the only source for the belief that James the Just was one of the seventy[-two] apostles in Luke 10?
… his two small works, On the Twelve Apostles of Christ and On the Seventy Apostles of Christ , are still regarded as dubious, …
… his two small works, On the Twelve Apostles of Christ and On the Seventy Apostles of Christ , are still regarded as dubious, …
Last edited:
A
Agathon
Guest
He’s the primary source.
T
Telstar
Guest
An article on the New Advent website, “St. James the Less”, claims that all of the references to James are most likely of the same person, in all instances where James is mentioned.
Last edited:
A
Agathon
Guest
As many academics and other Christians would say, James was a common name. The identification of James the Just with James the Less started with Jerome; it was an innovation rather than a tradition.An article on the New Advent website, “St. James the Less”, claims that all of the references to James are most likely of the same person, in all instances where James is mentioned.
Last edited:
- Status
- Not open for further replies.