M
mark_a
Guest
. . . . .seeking dialog with Orthodox and Catholics for better understanding of respective religions and political cooperation?
Oh, come on!! There must be someone!!. . . . .seeking dialog with Orthodox and Catholics for better understanding of respective religions and political cooperation?
I guess I need a catchier name. What was it about the question that made you suspect that?A wolf in sheeps clothing perhaps?![]()
It depends on WHICH denomination! There are different ‘leaders’ for each and for many the trends, hence the type of leader, also changes.Billy Graham is pretty ecunemical but he is not a high brow ecunemical talker he just wants to emphasize where christians agree. I think Father Richard John Neuhaus was one of the better ecunemical leaders that the Lutheran church had but that all ended when he became a catholic priest. I guess that explains his friendly overatures to catholcism.
(I snatched this quote from Catholic Answers at this address).“There are many other things which rightly keep me in the bosom of the Catholic Church. The consent of the people and nations keeps me, her authority keeps me, inaugurated by miracles, nourished in hope, enlarged by love, and established by age. The succession of priests keep me, from the very seat of the apostle Peter (to whom the Lord after his resurrection gave charge to feed his sheep) down to the present episcopate [of Pope Siricius]” (Against the Letter of Mani Called “The Foundation” 5 [A.D. 397]).
Carol I wouldn’t really call Augustine a reformer… Here is one thing that he said:
(I snatched this quote from Catholic Answers at this address).
Well NOW I see that, but just try to tell that to someone from the ‘reformed’ camp’, Though their reasoning is : all were human, and so subject to error.
So anything that the Church Father’s said they no longer agree, is simply error and can be disregarded as ‘we know better now’
One good thing is if you keep reading, the same 'error’s keep popping up over and over and you begin to wonder just exactly WHO is truly wrong.
Atreyu:![]()
Each and every individual Protestant is an infallible interpreter of Scripture–and of course, everyone who doesn’t agree with them is just a fallible human being.So anything that the Church Father’s said they no longer agree, is simply error and can be disregarded as ‘we know better now’
One good thing is if you keep reading, the same 'error’s keep popping up over and over and you begin to wonder just exactly WHO is truly wrong.![]()
Chuck Colson. . . . .seeking dialog with Orthodox and Catholics for better understanding of respective religions and political cooperation?
This may be of some slight relevance:. . . . .seeking dialog with Orthodox and Catholics for better understanding of respective religions and political cooperation?
Exactly what I’m looking for. Thanks.Chuck Colson
Timothy George
Geoffrey Wainwright
William Abraham
Carl Braaten
Robert Jenson
Mark Noll
Robert Webber
just to name a very few. I’m happy to provide more details about any of these people or others like them, but the question was so broad that there’s really no way to answer it other than a list of selected names off the top of my head.
I think you have corrected me a few other times also. . . . . .And of course Protestantism, Catholicism, and Orthodoxy are not “respective religions.” They are different forms of the same religion.