R
Rand_Al_Thor
Guest
Peace be with you!
I came across this website while searching for some information on the SSPX. sspx-schism.com/main.htm
They are doing some good work disproving SSPX, I think, but at the same time they are talking out of both sides of their mouths. They say that the SSPX is in schism and even call it a cult, and yet they are vehemently opposed to the New Mass and go as far as to say that not only is it not valid, but that it is “displeasing to God”. They nail the SSPX on not believing in the infallibility of the pope (which is hard for me to understand because SSPX are not sedevacantists and papal infallibility was defined in Vatican I) and at the same time claim that the New Mass is not valid…contradition? I think so. The New Mass is celebrated by the pope himself, and these people say it’s not valid but criticize the SSPX at the same time.
What’s everyone else’s take on these guys?
In Christ,
Rand
I came across this website while searching for some information on the SSPX. sspx-schism.com/main.htm
They are doing some good work disproving SSPX, I think, but at the same time they are talking out of both sides of their mouths. They say that the SSPX is in schism and even call it a cult, and yet they are vehemently opposed to the New Mass and go as far as to say that not only is it not valid, but that it is “displeasing to God”. They nail the SSPX on not believing in the infallibility of the pope (which is hard for me to understand because SSPX are not sedevacantists and papal infallibility was defined in Vatican I) and at the same time claim that the New Mass is not valid…contradition? I think so. The New Mass is celebrated by the pope himself, and these people say it’s not valid but criticize the SSPX at the same time.
What’s everyone else’s take on these guys?
In Christ,
Rand