F
FightingFat
Guest
Would I be right in stating that Mass is not said for the people?
My thoughts:
It is the highest form of worship, where the people are led by the priest in re-presenting (anamnesis) the perfect Sacrifice of Jesus Christ to God the Father.
Certainly the people gain much from this act of worship. But it’s not something done “for” them, this idea, if perpetuated, leads us to consider the Mass as a form of entertainment. It is not, it is a giving of ourselves to God and a uniting of ourselves in communion.
When we partake in the Mass, what we say and what we do (our actions) constitute a prayer to God the Holy Trinity. The priest doesn’t act something out for the edification of the congregation.
Does this make sense?
My thoughts:
It is the highest form of worship, where the people are led by the priest in re-presenting (anamnesis) the perfect Sacrifice of Jesus Christ to God the Father.
Certainly the people gain much from this act of worship. But it’s not something done “for” them, this idea, if perpetuated, leads us to consider the Mass as a form of entertainment. It is not, it is a giving of ourselves to God and a uniting of ourselves in communion.
When we partake in the Mass, what we say and what we do (our actions) constitute a prayer to God the Holy Trinity. The priest doesn’t act something out for the edification of the congregation.
Does this make sense?