Who is church father?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mickey3456987
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

Mickey3456987

Guest
What do we mean by church father?
They are from
33 a.c to council of nicea
Or
33 a.c to 600 a.c or something?

I’m so confused about this topic
need some help 🙂
 
They are generally considered prominent orthodox theologians of the early Church. 600 AD sounds like a good cutoff date to me. I don’t really know about that though.
 
Generally, it’s influential theologians through the eighth century (the 700s). The study of their writings is called Patristics. You sometimes see them broken up by those who wrote before Nicea I (the Ante-Nicene Fathers, or Early Church Fathers) and those who wrote after (the Post-Nicene Fathers).

You do sometimes see influential theologians after the eighth century referred to as Church Fathers, such as Thomas Aquinas for Catholics or Gregory Palamas for Orthodox, but, as I said, generally it means writers from the first through eighth centuries.
 
Last edited:
The church fathers are about 400 of the first bishops. They had the job of establish the liturgy. That is my understanding.
 
Being a bishop is not a prerequisite for being a Church father. Nor do they need to have had a particular influence on liturgy. I’ve never heard the number 400 in connection with Church fathers either. Of course, some of them were bishops and some did influence liturgy.
 
I may have the number wrong. All the ones I know the names of are bishops. I was taught that. Do you have names of some who were not bishops?
 
Tertullian and Origen would be two of the most interesting Fathers of the Church who were never ordained bishops.
 
Last edited:
Different people place the cut-off year at different times, but I commonly see St. John Damscene (died around 750 or so) listed as the final Church Father.

Some will make distinctions between the Church Fathers before and after Nicea. Or before and after Augustine.
 
My understanding is that Early Church Fathers, especially Augustine, were held in high esteem by early Protestant reformers. However this soon faded, outside some Anglicans and Lutherans.

The problem is who, exactly, designated this group of scholars as ECFs, and that group as either unimportant or even heretics. Thus most Protestants are very cautious about this group of people, to protect Sola Scriptura.
 
Last edited:
You can read a good number of their works in the Office of Readings of the Liturgy of the Hours.

The library I work in has a whole section devoted to Patristics.
 
Today I would like to talk about St Bernard of Clairvaux, called “the last of the Fathers” of the Church because once again in the 12th century he renewed and brought to the fore the important theology of the Fathers.
Benedict XVI
Last of the Fathers is a name given to St Bernard, not because he was the last of the fathers, but as an honorific, because he wrote like the Fathers. He would be the latest possible.

Around the time of St Bernard, new styles of theology started. These theologians were called Scholastics because they taught in schools, rather than as bishops. Universities came out of these schools.
 
Technically, Origen and Tertullian are “ecclesiastical.writers,” not Fathers. It is not about them not being bishops!

Tertullian started out as an orthodox lay theologian. But he ended up getting bitter about Catholics who did bad stuff during the persecutions, getting involved with a cult around the time his wife died, and becoming a heretic. So some of his writings are beloved, some are helpful but should be taken with a grain of salt, and some are totally ridiculous and bad.

Origen was a great teacher who taught saints, converted pagans, and ended heresies. He laid the foundations for all Christian theology and Biblical studies. But he was also big on floating wild ideas, and he had students who went heretical after his death and claimed their heresies were straight from Origen. So for a while his writings were condemned along with various fakes of his writing. But Origen himself was always clear about wanting only to teach what the Church teaches, and going along with bishops. So after his death, various super-orthodox saints and theologians “rescued” his works that were orthodox. But because of the controversy, he has never been officially canonized or named a Father or Doctor of the Church; he is just a brilliant holy guy and an ecclesiastical writer.

I love Tertullian, and he is a tragedy. I love Origen, and sometimes he was a twit. Bring along your grains of salt.
 
Last edited:
A lot of the Fathers of the Church are bishops. But some are priests, some are deacons, and some are monks, nuns, or laypeople. They are people who taught Church doctrines well, and with authority of some kind. Literally, we think of them as fathers and mothers of all Catholic and Christian teaching.

The Desert Fathers particularly included women monastics, and there is St. Macrina the Younger. And a few more.

There are also many ecclesiastical writers who are considered important for understanding, but do not carry the same level of teaching authority. (The Roman lady who wrote about her trip to the Holy Land and to the Sinai, and about the services and customs, was not a Father; but she is a holy witness, and her letter is definitely ecclesiastical!)
 
Last edited:
I don’t think there is a hard and fast rule about who us an Early Church Father. It’s not an official designation. There aren’t any considered as such after one in the 700s, and I think all the others are before 500. They are considered historically significant. Since they wrote in the same empire Jesus and the apostles lived in, they provide a context for understanding the New Testament and early Church.

They are confused with Doctors of the Church, a few of whom are both categories. Up to the Reformation there were 8 doctors of the Church (4 East, 4 West), all ECFs, which many likely thought would never change. St Thomas Aquinas was the ninth(!) doctor to be (controversially?) designated, first one in a very long time, perhaps as a response to Luther’s rejection of him.

Since then, “doctor” is more of a Catholic specific category, whereas ECF is of somewhat more universal interest, though more used by Catholics and EO than Protestants.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top