L
lak611
Guest
In another thread, a poster mentioned that Lutherans, Anglicans and Baptists who named their churches after Mary were not Protestant. Who is considered to be a Protestant, and what is your definition of Protestant?
Some Anglicans might disagree, but I think the general definition is any non-Catholic or non-Orthodox Christian church. Lutherans and Baptists are absolutely Protestants.In another thread, a poster mentioned that Lutherans, Anglicans and Baptists who named their churches after Mary were not Protestant. Who is considered to be a Protestant, and what is your definition of Protestant?
Since Sola Scriptura is the “formal principle” of the Reformation I would say that Protestantism is in reference to the specific heresy which sprung from Luther and his claim of Sola Scriptura. All groups who originate from a Sola Scriptura foundation are Protestants.In another thread, a poster mentioned that Lutherans, Anglicans and Baptists who named their churches after Mary were not Protestant. Who is considered to be a Protestant, and what is your definition of Protestant?
Luther (formal heretic) and Lutherans (mostly material heretics) most certainly are Protestants, in fact as you already noted they are the original Protestants.Thank you all, so far. It seems like there is a fair understanding of who is considered to be a Protestant. I started this thread in response to this post and several others before and after it. Now, I am hoping that this poster responds over here in this thread.
So Arminians are not Protestant? Arminians include:Since Sola Scriptura is the “formal principle” of the Reformation I would say that Protestantism is in reference to the specific heresy which sprung from Luther and his claim of Sola Scriptura. All groups who originate from a Sola Scriptura foundation are Protestants.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_solas
Do they accept or reject Sola Scriptura? Last time I checked they accepted it.So Arminians are not Protestant? Arminians include:
I used to think we accepted it… but once i Was on this forum long enough, I was corrected… my definition of sola scriptura is not what most of the Catholic here mean when they say it. Can you define it so I can answer truthfully if I accept it or not?Do they accept or reject Sola Scriptura? Last time I checked they accepted it.
Here is the definition of Sola Scriptura:I used to think we accepted it… but once i Was on this forum long enough, I was corrected… my definition of sola scriptura is not what most of the Catholic here mean when they say it. Can you define it so I can answer truthfully if I accept it or not?
Then NO I definitely do not believe that.Here is the definition of Sola Scriptura:Using the Bible ALONE, you are allowed to believe just about whatever doctrine you want to believe, AS LONG AS your interpretation does not agree with the Catholic Church.
The “typical” definition which I do not agree with is from the Cambridge Declaration:eefweb.com
- It does not mean that the Bible is the only place where truth can be found.
- It does not mean that the Bible is equally clear to all people.
- It does not mean that the instruction of Church is not helpful and authoritative.
Sola Scriptura
We reaffirm the inerrant Scripture to be the sole source of written divine revelation, which alone can bind the conscience. The Bible alone teaches all that is necessary for our salvation from sin and is the standard by which all Christian behavior must be measured. We deny that any creed, council or individual may bind a Christian’s conscience, that the Holy Spirit speaks independently of or contrary to what is set forth in the Bible, or that personal spiritual experience can ever be a vehicle of revelation.
You’re right. Some Anglicans disagree. But not all.Some Anglicans might disagree, but I think the general definition is any non-Catholic or non-Orthodox Christian church. Lutherans and Baptists are absolutely Protestants.
Except those of us who don’t.Anyone who says they are a Protestant is. Ergo, the Lutherans, Anglicans and Baptists would be Protestant because, in general, they say they are.
Not everyone else; Universalists are non-Christian, despite typically protestant trappings (at least one such group uses Byzantine trappings). Those groups claiming descent from John the Baptist are likewise actually outside the heritage of the Church Christ founded, and properly are not Christians.I hope that definition of Sola Scriptura (post #12) is not meant to be an accurate or typical description, because it strikes me as insulting more than anything…
Catholics are Catholics.
Orthodox are Orthodox.
Mormons and Jehovah’s Witnesses are not Christian.
Everyone else is Protestant.
That was the point.Except those of us who don’t.
GKC
Anglicanus Catholicus