Who is considered to be a Protestant?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lak611
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
:confused::confused: What you quoted wasn’t my post. I never said “binding the conscience is in the bible.” The Bible does talk about prophecy after Jesus. And I don’t get why you requoted that last bit?
 
Syele said:
:confused::confused: What you quoted wasn’t my post. I never said “binding the conscience is in the bible.” The Bible does talk about prophecy after Jesus. And I don’t get why you requoted that last bit?
Click to expand...
😦
 
I am trying to get your point, can’t do that with only a sad smiley.
 
2ndGen said:
Personal revelation to the members of The Magistarium has alwasy been in effect and used by The Holy Spirit to guide Priests in The Church since Acts (all decisions were made and prayed over and decided with the help of The Holy Spirit…including doctrinal decisions).
Click to expand...
I can’t figure out how you figure this is unbiblical?
 
Syele said:
I can’t figure out how you figure this is unbiblical?
Click to expand...
My quote “is” biblical.

Book of Acts 1

(the smiley was my quick way of apologizing for attributing the wrong words to you…embarressment)
 
it is indeed improper to include Anglicans with Protestants. The reason for this is that the Anglican churches have preserved the three orders of traditonal Catholic ministry, The Episcopate, the Priesthood and the Diaconate. The anathema pronounced by His Holiness Leo XIII in 1896 can no longer be considered valid. The reason for this is that all Anglican Bishops have been consecrated to the Episcopate by participating Polish National Catholic Bishops, which Rome has always believed to have a validly ordained clergy. The PNCC church may be schismatic but it is not heretical. Pope John Paul II demonstrated this new openess to Anglican priesthood when he visited the Anglican Canterbury Cathedral in England. He took off his episcopal ring and placed it on the hand of the archbishop of Canterbury. First among equals of all anglican heirarchs. Anglicans are eucharist oriented. All seven sacraments are available . To relegate Anglicanism to a general Protestantism is not only unfair but perhaps blasphemous
 
Phil1946 said:
it is indeed improper to include Anglicans with Protestants. The reason for this is that the Anglican churches have preserved the three orders of traditonal Catholic ministry, The Episcopate, the Priesthood and the Diaconate. The anathema pronounced by His Holiness Leo XIII in 1896 can no longer be considered valid. The reason for this is that all Anglican Bishops have been consecrated to the Episcopate by participating Polish National Catholic Bishops, which Rome has always believed to have a validly ordained clergy. The PNCC church may be schismatic but it is not heretical. Pope John Paul II demonstrated this new openess to Anglican priesthood when he visited the Anglican Canterbury Cathedral in England. He took off his episcopal ring and placed it on the hand of the archbishop of Canterbury. First among equals of all anglican heirarchs. Anglicans are eucharist oriented. All seven sacraments are available . To relegate Anglicanism to a general Protestantism is not only unfair but perhaps blasphemous
Click to expand...
Thank you for educating us on that.

For me personally, it’s useful information.

👍
 
Margarite said:
Untrue. Mormons are not Protestant because they are not Christian.
Click to expand...
Ah! Let me ammend my statement:
Any of the Christian denominations which started after about 1630 is a Protestant denomination, whether they admit it or not.
 
Phil1946 said:
it is indeed improper to include Anglicans with Protestants. The reason for this is that the Anglican churches have preserved the three orders of traditonal Catholic ministry, The Episcopate, the Priesthood and the Diaconate. The anathema pronounced by His Holiness Leo XIII in 1896 can no longer be considered valid. The reason for this is that all Anglican Bishops have been consecrated to the Episcopate by participating Polish National Catholic Bishops, which Rome has always believed to have a validly ordained clergy. The PNCC church may be schismatic but it is not heretical. Pope John Paul II demonstrated this new openess to Anglican priesthood when he visited the Anglican Canterbury Cathedral in England. He took off his episcopal ring and placed it on the hand of the archbishop of Canterbury. First among equals of all anglican heirarchs. Anglicans are eucharist oriented. All seven sacraments are available . To relegate Anglicanism to a general Protestantism is not only unfair but perhaps blasphemous
Click to expand...
Sounds like what I’ve been saying for years, here, esp. ref: Apostolicae Curae. Welcome aboard.

Old Catholic (Utrecht) co-consecrations began with the Anglicans in 1932 and, specifically, PNCC co-consecrations with the Episcopal Church in 1946. Given the Anglican norm of 3 bishops per consecration, the Dutch Touch gets passed around, throughly. My own priest (traditional Anglican) was ordained by a bishop one of whose consecrators had PNCC lines, directly. Still, I’m not sure that all Anglican bishops have PNCC lines, though certainly most do. But PNCC lines don’t help if the matter is invalid for consecration.

GKC

Anglicanus Catholicus
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top