W
WesleyF
Guest
I thought over this again and here’s what I think -
Jesus didn’t answer the question directly.
“Which of these three, do you think, proved neighbor to the man who fell among the robbers?”
“The one who showed him mercy.”
This shows that the Samaritan man proved to be a neighbor to the man who fell among the robbers. It doesn’t say that the robber was neighbor to the Samaritan man. However, if Mr. X is the neighbor of Mr. Y, then by definition Mr. Y is the neighbor of Mr. X.
Jesus told the lawyer, “Go and do likewise”; in other words, go and be a neighbor to everyone. If I am to be a neighbor to everyone, then by definition everybody is a neighbor to me. Now it makes sense.
Jesus didn’t answer the question directly.
“Which of these three, do you think, proved neighbor to the man who fell among the robbers?”
“The one who showed him mercy.”
This shows that the Samaritan man proved to be a neighbor to the man who fell among the robbers. It doesn’t say that the robber was neighbor to the Samaritan man. However, if Mr. X is the neighbor of Mr. Y, then by definition Mr. Y is the neighbor of Mr. X.
Jesus told the lawyer, “Go and do likewise”; in other words, go and be a neighbor to everyone. If I am to be a neighbor to everyone, then by definition everybody is a neighbor to me. Now it makes sense.