Who Was Joseph Smith?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thephilosopher6
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
thephilosopher6:
Here’s a good Mormon debunking site for everyone: CES Letter - My Search for Answers to my Mormon Doubts
I read that a couple of years ago. I also read FAIR’s reply, which was quite pathetic.
I noticed the 2015. Have they updated it since then?
 
What does the death penalty have to do with this? I said nothing about the death penalty. I asked what the position of the Catholic Church would be concerning mobs descending on jails to kill its prisoners. So are you suggesting that in 1844 it would have been acceptable then to the Catholic Church? I’m satisfied with whatever you answer, yes or no.
The Catholic Church would be against any armed insurrection which subverted the state authority in the dispensation of justice. The mob was took to itself an authority it did not have to itself. That is what the mob in carthage did do in the end. This said, where there is a proper lack authority, a mob may be most proximate entity to keep order.

However, from a human perspective, when these is a belief that justice will not be served, the people may take matters into their own hands. Given that the JSJ had broken out of jail and escaped in the past, the fact that he had smuggled pistols in the jail cell, should be considered mitigating factors. Being in possession of firearms while in jail just following the rules.

As for the Bible, many crimes required the death penalty. Whether or not a state applies it is and should be left to the prudential judgement of the state. If you do not like the death penalty, that is well and good, but don’t get carried away trying to read into the bible you opinion - it is not there. When it does mean Thou shalt not kill, it means the shedding of innocent blood.
 
If I read this right, then you are saying that the Catholic Church would not have approved of the mob storming the jail to take away his life. That was my question. Thank you for answering it. In the eyes of the Church, then, it would not have been considered a good thing. I think it’s fair then to say that these were not goodly people doing a goodly thing. These were angry vigilantes doing what they thought needed to be done (understandably so), even though Joseph had not been tried, convicted and sentenced of a capital offense.

I’m not in any way sticking up for Joseph Smith. I think he was an evil man, a con artist and a sexual predator, not to mention the lies, counterfeiting, rioting, treason, attempted murder and all the other things that he was accused of. I believe he was guilty of all of them. I think that among the mob were men who were more than a little upset that he had hit on their wives. I’d be furious as well. But I don’t think that “thou shalt not kill” allows for us to be the judge, jury and executioner. I don’t think that God’s laws change, and I do believe that the slaying of Joseph Smith was a violation of the sixth commandment.
 
Mitt Romney threw Judge Roy Moore under the bus for allegedly having sexual relations with a 14 year old girl when he was 32, yet belongs to a church whose leader, Joseph Smith, preyed on a 14 year old girl when he was 36. Makes sense to me.
 
No where in the Bible is the Trinity mentioned
(Matthew 28:19, 2 Corinthians 13:14, Luke 3:21-22)
The Churches after the Great Apostasy made that up … among a ton of other things.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You are funny. Ever consider becoming a comedian?
 
Last edited:
So the apostasy set in - right after Jesus came, to restore His people, and then allowed another apostasy to settle for a few hundred years until a lad in New York found some tablets no one has seen.

Checks out.
 
I am starting to think you lied about being a Latter-day Saint.
Really? Did the spirit tell you this?

I was a member for decades. I was in five bishoprics. Two missions. Three children who were full-time missionaries. Seminary teacher. Temple ordinance worker. I’m not a hater. I love truth. That is why I left the Mormon church.
 
Last edited:
The Bible does not explicitly teach the Trinity. It is assumed that those who read it knew it. So one has to come to the bible with a already formed mind (an enculturation in a sense). Reading the bible requires assumptions not contained in the bible
 
Based on my being extremely familiar with a family that suffered from severe bipolar disorder, I’m willing to give him the benefit of doubt. Either way, the bottom line is that it’s a giant fraud and the LDS leaders of today are complicit in perpetuating the fraud.
I was flagged for saying this. Go figure . . .
 
The Bible does not explicitly teach the Trinity. It is assumed that those who read it knew it. So one has to come to the bible with a already formed mind (an enculturation in a sense). Reading the bible requires assumptions not contained in the bible
I don’t think that is entirely right. The Bible does explicitly teach the Trinity because not only are the three persons of the Trinity mentioned multiple times as distinct persons, they are mentioned as also being of one nature. I think it’s more accurate to say that the Bible doesn’t explicitly lay out all the details of the Trinity and how it can exactly be defined.
 
Last edited:
???
If you gave an alien from the planet Kolob the bible would the alien come up with the Trinity?
 
I would not be surprised that someone from the IAU will not at some point name a some planet or star proximate to Sgr A Kolob. Some of the guys there have a wicked sense of humor. Eventually a few in that region are going to be suck in the SMBH which is Sag A. Some in the LDS leadership theorized in the past that it was Sag A, but come to find out it is a SMBH. Anyone who is going to hie to Kolob would have to be hieing at the speed of tachyons.

The point is that if an alien got off his UFO and someone gave him a bible to go thump around on his/her planet, there is no way the alien will come with the Trinity.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top