I believe in ‘mysteries’ too, but if it’s Allah using the ‘royal we’ there, then suddenly a few verses later, it’s Muhammad speaking in first person.
51: 50 So flee to Allah (from His Torment to His Mercy Islamic Monotheism), verily, I (Muhammad ) am a plain warner to you from Him.
The “I” here can’t be Allah saying that he is himself a plain warner to us from himself.
Within the space of two verses the “I” or “we” switches from Allah to Muhammad, without pause.
Which leaves Muhammad speaking in first person, which was my original point, and we’re now back around to it.
There’s nothing there saying “I am compelled/commanded/requested to say this…”
Which one?
Mu’tazili tafsir
Tanwir al-Miqbas
Al-Mu’jam al-Kabeer
Tafsir al-Baghawi
Tafsir ibn Kathir
Tafsir al-Qurtubi
Tafsir al-Tabari
Tafsir al-Jalalayn
Tafsir al-Mizan
Tafsir of Fakhr al-Din
Dur al-Manthur
Fi zilal al-Qur’an
Tafhim al-Qur’an
Tadabbur-i-Qur’an
Holy Quran (puya)
Majma al-Bayan
Nuur al-Thaqalayn
al-Safi
or another?
I’m sorry, but the appeal to be to switch off my mind and simply ‘believe’ the inconsistencies has no allure.
Simply because you retrospectively try to attach some sense to Muhammad’s ramblings is however commendable.