P
phil3
Guest
You can always thrown wooden shoes at the robots.
It seems to be the same players that hyped Russian collusion, the impeachment fiasco, extending lockdown measures, promoting rioting and looting in the streets, mob justice vis a vis police action, defunding the police, decimating small businesses, socialism (free health care, free college tuition, etc.), the end of innocent until proven guilty, stacking the Supreme Court, getting rid of the electoral college, and the end of free speech, that are now pushing this “200, 000+ dead as the result of what Trump did or said” despite that their own suggestions back then would have been provably worse. Let’s just ignore the benefit of hindsight and castigate without cause because our cause justifies any means we care to impose.I do not claim that each and every one of those 200,000+ died solely because of DJT’s incompetence, but I do believe that the number is significantly higher than it otherwise could have been for that very reason. So yes, at least as much blood on his hands as he claimed was on Obama’s, and likely much more.
What NY did not fully know was whether the hospital rooms would fill up if they did not discharge patients who were stable. Yes, they knew there was a risk sending them to nursing homes, but there was a risk in not sending them to nursing homes to - the risk that new patients might have to be turned away. It turned out that the saturation point at the hospitals was not reached, but that is easy to see only with hindsight.there was nothing to figure out, NY fully knew the essentials that elder facilities were high risk and putting Covid positive people in these homes would put the healthy at great risk.
Right. Trump is responsible for killing 200 000 , according to Joe Biden, because he should have done something he didn’t - which is never specified.Theo520:
What NY did not fully know was whether the hospital rooms would fill up if they did not discharge patients who were stable. Yes, they knew there was a risk sending them to nursing homes, but there was a risk in not sending them to nursing homes to - the risk that new patients might have to be turned away. It turned out that the saturation point at the hospitals was not reached, but that is easy to see only with hindsight.there was nothing to figure out, NY fully knew the essentials that elder facilities were high risk and putting Covid positive people in these homes would put the healthy at great risk.
I guess that is what happens when we trust the expert “scientist” modellers like Neil Ferguson at the Imperial College whose prognostications were orders of magnitude off.Theo520:
What NY did not fully know was whether the hospital rooms would fill up if they did not discharge patients who were stable. Yes, they knew there was a risk sending them to nursing homes, but there was a risk in not sending them to nursing homes to - the risk that new patients might have to be turned away. It turned out that the saturation point at the hospitals was not reached, but that is easy to see only with hindsight.there was nothing to figure out, NY fully knew the essentials that elder facilities were high risk and putting Covid positive people in these homes would put the healthy at great risk.
That’s not a logical analysis. ICU beds were the only precious commodity, hospitals had loads of non-ICU beds and many had set up wings dedicated to COVID care. I suspect if the patient wasn’t earning ICU $$$, they preferred to force a discharge to a nursing home rather than keep them another week under nurses supervision.What NY did not fully know was whether the hospital rooms would fill up if they did not discharge patients who were stable.
We all can be cynical but try a little charity. Not all cases and case workers are the same.I suspect if the patient wasn’t earning ICU $$$, they preferred to force a discharge to a nursing home rather than keep them another week under nurses supervision.
Why didn’t NY use the emergency hospitals they erected for COVID patients, they even had a hospital ship that would have been perfect for convalescence, for patients that didn’t need acute care.We all can be cynical but try a little charity. Not all cases and case workers are the same.