S
Sir_Knight
Guest
A person can confess there but absolution can only be obtained IN PERSON from a Catholic priest.
I have never known what to do with that verse. After having looked it up just now, it is interesting to note that 10 of the remaining 11 were present to receive this blessing. Thomas was not. I have no idea if this was to give the apostles the power to forgive, or the power to discern God’s forgiveness and pronounce it to others. But I am still not sure if there is a connection between this exchange and priests today. To me, if a priest abuses his position and refuses to forgive a sin that God has already forgiven (the repentance and penance are met, along with whatever other things might be required), then it does NOT mean that the sin is not forgiven, but rather that the priest has just committed a sin. confused
Another question: nonCatholics (such as myself) are not allowed the Sacrament of Reconciliation (is that what it is called?). So does that mean you believe that when we sin, we cannot be forgiven? Or is it that we would have to become Catholic for this to be the case? And if this is so, why would anyone want to put themselves in that position when they previously could go directly to God for forgiveness?