E
EvangelCatholic
Guest
The comments about churches popping up all over the place * is great. It is like we have reminders of Christ all around us. Little chapels that we can seek shelter in.*
The comments about churches popping up all over the place * is great. It is like we have reminders of Christ all around us. Little chapels that we can seek shelter in.*
:doh2: Yes, the Apostles would be so proud.![]()
The comments about churches popping up all over the place * is great. It is like we have reminders of Christ all around us. Little chapels that we can seek shelter in.*
In the large Pennsylvania cities–Reading, and Allentown/Bethlehem/Easton—which are surrounding my area, small churches are not popping up on nearly every corner—not even remotely close to it; instead we have homicides and drug dealing all over. I can only wish we had churches instead of the reality.
In my mind, it does come down to how we are using our energy and time: are we really expending ourselves, energy and attention-wise, being obedient to God in the many areas we do agree on what we should do as Christians? Have we exhausted ourselves in obeying God in practical ways to serve people, since we can all agree we been commanded to do this? If God has set before us a task such as caring for the poor, and we all know with crystal clarity that He wants us to do these things, but we give the clear tasks only a little of our energy while burning off more energy elsewhere, why should we expect Him to give us light and understanding on the murkier, messier issues?I think I would prefer it if a lot of the energy that went into Luther-bashing, or Calvin-bashing (when they get tired of Luther-bashing) went into how we can walk in charity with each other today. We are NOT going back in time to fix what happened then. Blaming each other goes nowhere. It is good to know history, bad to repeat it, to continually bring up what the other’s ancestors did.
That was then, this is now. Where do we go from here?
Finding areas where we can work together for the glory of God is always a good thing. We call what you describe “corporal works of mercy”. This, however, does not cover over or make up for doctrinal error.In my mind, it does come down to how we are using our energy and time: are we really expending ourselves, energy and attention-wise, being obedient to God in the many areas we do agree on what we should do as Christians? Have we exhausted ourselves in obeying God in practical ways to serve people, since we can all agree we been commanded to do this? If God has set before us a task such as caring for the poor, and we all know with crystal clarity that He wants us to do these things, but we give the clear tasks only a little of our energy while burning off more energy elsewhere, why should we expect Him to give us light and understanding on the murkier, messier issues?
Here’s a local news story from today, here: “Reading residents turn to a higher power to stop the violence”. wfmz.com/news-regional-berks/reading-residents-turn-to-a-higher-power-to-stop-the-violence/26929976In the large Pennsylvania cities–Reading, and Allentown/Bethlehem/Easton—which are surrounding my area, small churches are not popping up on nearly every corner—not even remotely close to it; instead we have homicides and drug dealing all over. I can only wish we had churches instead of the reality.
Yes, when I see a church, regardless the denomination, a good feeling comes to me since I know Christians are nearby.In the large Pennsylvania cities–Reading, and Allentown/Bethlehem/Easton—which are surrounding my area, small churches are not popping up on nearly every corner—not even remotely close to it; instead we have homicides and drug dealing all over. I can only wish we had churches instead of the reality.
Yes, I agree we need both. But, respectfully, Steve, I was trying to make some different points.Finding areas where we can work together for the glory of God is always a good thing. We call what you describe “corporal works of mercy”. This, however, does not cover over or make up for doctrinal error.
On the flip side, even if one believes in doctrines that are free from error but fails to put flesh on the words of the gospel (feed the hungry, give water to the thirsty, clothe the naked…) he has failed in keeping God’s commands. We need the Truth and we must respond to the Truth. We need both.
Me too. Around my city they are lights scattered in the darkness.Yes, when I see a church, regardless the denomination, a good feeling comes to me since I know Christians are nearby.
Very nicely put - along with your follow up post on this.In my mind, it does come down to how we are using our energy and time: are we really expending ourselves, energy and attention-wise, being obedient to God in the many areas we do agree on what we should do as Christians? Have we exhausted ourselves in obeying God in practical ways to serve people, since we can all agree we been commanded to do this? If God has set before us a task such as caring for the poor, and we all know with crystal clarity that He wants us to do these things, but we give the clear tasks only a little of our energy while burning off more energy elsewhere, why should we expect Him to give us light and understanding on the murkier, messier issues?
This.Very nicely put - along with your follow up post on this.
I am reminded of Jesus comment to the Pharisees about their attention to detail…
"Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you tithe mint and dill and cummin, and have neglected the weightier matters of the law, justice and mercy and faith; these you ought to have done, without neglecting the others. - (Matthew 23:23)
The reason I thought of this is the balance it gives to the issue. Both things need to have their due an.
In the case you present, there is a rather broad and implicit assumption that we don’t take care of the poor, and instead devote ourselves to intellectual matters and disagreements.
As with so many things this will vary a great deal from individual to individual but I think that on the whole…we are not guilty of being out of balance in how we expend our energies. After all, the Christian community as a whole is the largest single charitable group of organizations in the world.
I certainly do not get the impression from most of our apologetic discussions here that those involved are lacking in charity either in how they present their arguments or in what they see as necessary in the Christian life. The exceptions to this are, for the most part weeded out over time whether they be Catholic or protestant.
Just some thoughts.
Peace
James
Hi James–I’m not disagreeing with the need for both, and the need for balance. I’m still trying to express a different point, and it seems I’m not doing it too well. If you don’t mind a brief explanation of myself, I literally think in pictures, which can be very high-resolution and complex–I’m an artist by profession–and I often have hard time “downloading” my mental picture thought processes into the more cramped medium of words…so I do accept the blame for my lack of communication (although accepting the blame doesn’t keep me from eventually giving up and walking away from a conversationVery nicely put - along with your follow up post on this.
I am reminded of Jesus comment to the Pharisees about their attention to detail…
"Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you tithe mint and dill and cummin, and have neglected the weightier matters of the law, justice and mercy and faith; these you ought to have done, without neglecting the others. - (Matthew 23:23)
The reason I thought of this is the balance it gives to the issue. Both things need to have their due an.
In the case you present, there is a rather broad and implicit assumption that we don’t take care of the poor, and instead devote ourselves to intellectual matters and disagreements.
As with so many things this will vary a great deal from individual to individual but I think that on the whole…we are not guilty of being out of balance in how we expend our energies. After all, the Christian community as a whole is the largest single charitable group of organizations in the world.
I certainly do not get the impression from most of our apologetic discussions here that those involved are lacking in charity either in how they present their arguments or in what they see as necessary in the Christian life. The exceptions to this are, for the most part weeded out over time whether they be Catholic or protestant.
Just some thoughts.
Peace
James
What is the correct number of denominations, HH?Is 242 ridiculously inflated for the amount of Catholic denominations? Or is it accurate?
Egg-zactly.I and there are hundreds of thousands of these at a minimum.
You are exactly right.I don’t know why the number is important. The fact that there is no way to give a precise number is actually a point in favor of the argument you want to make. The reality of Protestant division is so messy and complex that there is no way to give an exact number.
Edwin
The comments about churches popping up all over the place * is great. It is like we have reminders of Christ all around us. Little chapels that we can seek shelter in.*
As long as they preach the Truth, I say
But if they are preaching, say, that the Epistles of St. Paul are satanic, I would not “seek shelter” there.
If they preach that eating grass is a means of growing closer to God, I would not “seek shelter” there.
夜鲁鲁鲁夜夜综合视频,美国a级毛片,依依成人,人妻中文字幕无码专区,成·人免费午夜视频在线观看在线播放
If their pastor proclaims that preaching in the nude is a sacrament, I would “not seek shelter” there.
http://www.iefimerida.gr/sites/default/files/naked_0.jpg
So, I don’t think it’s good that there are all sorts of churches springing up in malls and city corners all over the world.
Rather, it’s just what the devil ordered, IMHO.
Really?Yes, when I see a church, regardless the denomination, a good feeling comes to me since I know Christians are nearby.
No problem. I have the same problem many timesHi James–I’m not disagreeing with the need for both, and the need for balance. I’m still trying to express a different point, and it seems I’m not doing it too well.
I’m not an artist, but I too think in “pictures” many times - or a phrase will come to mind that has all sorts of things behind it and like you I struggle to describe it in the written word.If you don’t mind a brief explanation of myself, I literally think in pictures, which can be very high-resolution and complex–I’m an artist by profession–and I often have hard time “downloading” my mental picture thought processes into the more cramped medium of words…so I do accept the blame for my lack of communication (although accepting the blame doesn’t keep me from eventually giving up and walking away from a conversation).
Sorry if I sounded accusatory there - Didn’t mean to. Some of my own prejudice or maybe guilt showing perhaps.I don’t have any “broad and implicit assumption that we don’t take care of the poor”.
Join the club.It’s more like this, just using my particular religious predicament as an example: when I was younger, what the truth was seemed pretty clear. The older I get, for at least the last 20 years, the less clear things become. If I do say so myselfI’m a very intelligent woman, not fuzzy-minded, but that’s just made it harder for me—the more I’ve learned and listened to the other sides’ perspectives on religious issues (among Judaism vs. Christianity in particular in my case) the more I’m able to see why others believe as they do, grasping some of the nuances of their beliefs, and so the more respect I have for people with differing beliefs. I’ve also come to see that intellect and learning alone cannot resolve religious conumdrums; light has to come from God. I believe He will give me the amount of light I need to obey for the next step I take if I am obedient to the clarity I do have, but He doesn’t promise everyone any more light than that. Among the set of things I believe, the subset of “things I’m sure about” is pretty small, and the subset of “things I hope are true” is larger. I used to believe I was sure about much more. I realize some people have a large set of things they are sure about.
AgreedAnyway, I think there are many people in the same boat as me, of having an totally earnest desire to seek for greater clarity on religious issues, but finding such definitive clarity is denied them over a long period of many years, despite their best efforts, study, open-mindedness and lack of attachment to a sin that might cloud their understanding. For me, I’ve come realize all I can do is walk forward in obedience into the small area of light which I do have. If I don’t spend my energy faithfully that way–doing justice, loving mercy, and walking humbly with God, I can’t complain if God doesn’t give me more light on other religious issues which I would like resolved.
Yes - and yet sometimes such discussion (or just reading or listening to discussions can help). But the light will come in it’s own time - and not necessarily how we expect.For people like myself, more and more discussions, debates and arguments don’t help. We just have to trust and obey and wait.
Thanks for sharing this. I think you did a fine job.I know I haven’t expressed myself clearly, but that’s all I’ve got for now, words-wise.![]()
Possibly. But then, the town I used to live in (Huntington, Indiana) had two Catholic parishes right next to each other, because the Irish and the Germans couldn’t get along. St. Mary’s was founded by people who couldn’t get along with the folks at St. Peter and Paul.Please. I would be quite comfortable in assuming that the “Bible Believing Church of Podunk, Idaho” is not a religious organization within a larger, established faith tradition, such as the Franciscans, the Jesuits, the Little Sisters of the Poor are to the Catholic Church. More likely it was started by a well meaning farmer who didn’t personally agree with some doctrinal element or practice found in the “First Podunk Bible Church”. So he and his friends started their own.
(Disclosure:, these are both hypothetical faith communities).
lol. Where in the world do you find this stuff?As long as they preach the Truth, I say
But if they are preaching, say, that the Epistles of St. Paul are satanic, I would not “seek shelter” there.
If they preach that eating grass is a means of growing closer to God, I would not “seek shelter” there.
夜鲁鲁鲁夜夜综合视频,美国a级毛片,依依成人,人妻中文字幕无码专区,成·人免费午夜视频在线观看在线播放
If their pastor proclaims that preaching in the nude is a sacrament, I would “not seek shelter” there.
http://www.iefimerida.gr/sites/default/files/naked_0.jpg
So, I don’t think it’s good that there are all sorts of churches springing up in malls and city corners all over the world.
Rather, it’s just what the devil ordered, IMHO.