Sorry if you hate certain words. I’m an equil opportunity word user when it comes to the English language. Because of her status relating to gender Pathia has experienced very much discrimination, and the socalled Catholic and Christian charities were the worst culprits.I think he was using the Catholic charity insurance as one example of many charity insurances… one of which Parthia could take part in.
BTW, I hate the word “discrimination”… it seems to be thrown about way to easily.
Parthia has been PM’ing me will give me the details of the discrimination if he chooses.Sorry if you hate certain words. I’m an equil opportunity word user when it comes to the English language. Because of her status relating to gender Pathia has experienced very much discrimination, and the socalled Catholic and Christian charities were the worst culprits.
First I can alredy tell what your attitude is by calling her a “he”. By the way Iv’e had contact with her thru here and yahoo. I don’t use any word willy nilly. I use words when they are practical and or appropriate. Most words of the English langauge are fair game for me at one time or another. Remeber many who voted for George Wallace thought discrimination was an over used word too.Parthia has been PM’ing me will give me the details of the discrimination if he chooses.
But, as you well know, the word “discrimination” is way over-used, especially by people with their own agenda. I’m very skeptical of people who throw the word around willy-nilly.
Maybe you’re confusing “attitude” with “ignorance”. Big difference.First I can alredy tell what your attitude is by calling her a “he”.
Are you familiar with the words, “Hasty to judge others”?the way Iv’e had contact with her thru here and yahoo. I don’t use any word willy nilly. I use words when they are practical and or appropriate. Most words of the English langauge are fair game for me at one time or another.
Wow, that was random and irrelevant.Remeber many who voted for George Wallace thought discrimination was an over used word too.
One gets hasty to judge other when they see the same or similer attitudes over and over countless times, thats human nature. I never have nor ever will ever proclaim to be above human nature. Readup on things and you won’t have to worry about being ignorant, if thats what you think you are, I didn’t say it you did.Maybe you’re confusing “attitude” with “ignorance”. Big difference.
Are you familiar with the words, “Hasty to judge others”? .
Why would that discriminate against Pathia? You’re assuming that her gender problem would mean that a Catholic insurance group wouldn’t care for her? Someone needed to let Mother Theresa know that she should not have taken care of all the people with Aids, especially if they were homosexual?!?! Rethink the Pathia thing, everyone gets taken care of thru the Catholic system.That would discriminate against those like Pathia for gender type issues. Yeah right!
“Readup on things…” I’m supposed to read up on Parthia’s gender? In regards to that, I don’t claim any disappointments in being ignorant. I’d just appreciate it that you would quit judging my ignorance as having an attitude. It only belittles you. Parthia and I have had numerous PM’s and none of them have displayed the “uppity attitude” that you’ve shown to me and others.One gets hasty to judge other when they see the same or similer attitudes over and over countless times, thats human nature. I never have nor ever will ever proclaim to be above human nature. Readup on things and you won’t have to worry about being ignorant, if thats what you think you are, I didn’t say it you did.
What was wrong with calling Pathia a “he”? I don’t remember Pathia saying either way, except that she was both. I am calling her a she because her name sounds feminine with the ia ending. Is that wrong too?First I can alredy tell what your attitude is by calling her a “he”. By the way Iv’e had contact with her thru here and yahoo. I don’t use any word willy nilly. I use words when they are practical and or appropriate. Most words of the English langauge are fair game for me at one time or another. Remeber many who voted for George Wallace thought discrimination was an over used word too.
… just pondering, isn’t using the words “willy nilly” an example of using words willy nilly? Hmmmm…I don’t use any word willy nilly. I use words when they are practical and or appropriate.
You used Willy nilly first!… just pondering, isn’t using the words “willy nilly” an example of using words willy nilly? Hmmmm…
Funny thing I think you are using an uppity attitude twards me. Pathia is tired and worn out from life and rightfully so. I am not to that stage yet. My temperment and uppityness is very mild as compared to most of my family. Count it as a blessing you are dealing with the more mildmannered and forgiving me than my parents or siblings. What the situation amounts to is the only way Pathia will get fair treatment is to pretend to be and live as a male. Right now while she feels neither gender, the way she lives is closer to female, than male. I have seen pictures of her nd my eyes work just fine. While she is intersexual, she in some ways is treated like a transsexual, discriminated against very much. Something I take umbrage with.“Readup on things…” I’m supposed to read up on Parthia’s gender? In regards to that, I don’t claim any disappointments in being ignorant. I’d just appreciate it that you would quit judging my ignorance as having an attitude. It only belittles you. Parthia and I have had numerous PM’s and none of them have displayed the “uppity attitude” that you’ve shown to me and others.
I’ve repeatedly described myself as female and corrected people in the past repeatedly over the matter. However I don’t recall you being part of those threads, don’t sweat it.What was wrong with calling Pathia a “he”? I don’t remember Pathia saying either way, except that she was both. I am calling her a she because her name sounds feminine with the ia ending. Is that wrong too?
This is for Pathia. You’ve probably done this already, but have you ever approached the medical teaching universities for your problem? Wondering if they would be interested in you as a study case which would be free medical.I’ve repeatedly described myself as female and corrected people in the past repeatedly over the matter. However I don’t recall you being part of those threads, don’t sweat it.
I have gotten some care that way, but studying people like me is still sort of taboo. The medical community prefers to solve it with a knife, so does the Church.This is for Pathia. You’ve probably done this already, but have you ever approached the medical teaching universities for your problem? Wondering if they would be interested in you as a study case which would be free medical.
Why are you blaming things on the Church?I have gotten some care that way, but studying people like me is still sort of taboo. The medical community prefers to solve it with a knife, so does the Church.
There’s a difference between ‘socialised medicine’ and a universal health scheme. The fact that nearly 50,000,000 people in the richest (and most overtly religious) country in the world have no access to health care is a national disgrace. In Australia, we don’t have socialised medicine but a universal health car scheme funded by a 1.5% levy on all taxpayers’ taxable income. Relax, we still have private health insurance for those who can afford it. But the poorest of the poor has access to health care in a public hospital.Or everyone is tired of your same old arguement: business bad, rich people evil, inept government taking over more of the country good; gimme gimme gimme.
BTW, what you failed to grasp is that in a country w/ socialized medicine, the fellow in that article would have had to wait for care and would probably have died waiting. You can’t had millions more to a system already short of docs and expect cost to go down or there to be no waits.
First of all, check your numbers.There’s a difference between ‘socialised medicine’ and a universal health scheme. The fact that nearly 50,000,000 people in the richest (and most overtly religious) country in the world have no access to health care is a national disgrace. In Australia, we don’t have socialised medicine but a universal health car scheme funded by a 1.5% levy on all taxpayers’ taxable income. Relax, we still have private health insurance for those who can afford it. But the poorest of the poor has access to health care in a public hospital.
I recently saw a placard held by an anti-health care reform protestor in the US. It read, “Health care is not a Right”. I’m interested in the views of fellow Christians about that little gem. And what they think Jesus might have to say about it.
No, we don’t. They offer chronic care, our system does not. If I go to the ER for my chronic issues, they will just run a few tests, tell me to go see a specialist and send me out the door.In American everyone has access to the healthcare you are mentioning in Australia.
I specifically said, they offer the same healthcare that pageois was talking about in Australia - nothing more and nothing less - to those who don’t have health insurance.No, we don’t. They offer chronic care, our system does not. If I go to the ER for my chronic issues, they will just run a few tests, tell me to go see a specialist and send me out the door.
What they are proposing here is not universal health care but socialized medicine. The plan forces people go onto the govt program as soon as there is any change in their existing plan.There’s a difference between ‘socialised medicine’ and a universal health scheme. The fact that nearly 50,000,000 people in the richest (and most overtly religious) country in the world have no access to health care is a national disgrace. In Australia, we don’t have socialised medicine but a universal health car scheme funded by a 1.5% levy on all taxpayers’ taxable income. Relax, we still have private health insurance for those who can afford it. But the poorest of the poor has access to health care in a public hospital.
I recently saw a placard held by an anti-health care reform protestor in the US. It read, “Health care is not a Right”. I’m interested in the views of fellow Christians about that little gem. And what they think Jesus might have to say about it.