Why are atheists so unhappy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RNRobert
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
And who fought in that war? Was it mostly Atheists or Christians? I’ll give you the answer it was mostly Christians using their Christian ideals of equality and love for their neighbor (remember Christianity did not invent slavery it existed long before it ever came along). And where do you think Lincoln got his ideals (I’ll give you a hint he was Christian)? Also the Catholic Church worked hard in eradicating slavery you only need to read history to know this. Furthermore, any and all moral progressive movements needed the backing of Christians (has I hardly think there were many atheists around). These Christians did not suddenly up and realize freedom, equality and justice were moral absolutes for these were ideals preached by Jesus (God incarnate). Those who chose not to respond in bringing about good were the moral relativists (be it Christian or otherwise), as the one thing the relativist is absolutely sure of is that there are no absolutes. The reality is you can’t have a well-functioning society based (in practice) on moral relativism.
I notice no one responded to this, and as someone who grew up in Missouri (a border state), I know that the majority of people who fought in the Civil War - on BOTH sides - were Christians.

Believe me, there were plenty of devout Christians - both Catholic and Protestant - on both sides of the argument. And all of them cited Scripture verses to back up their views.
 
Assuming Jesus existed, I don’t think he was a liar or a lunatic or the Lord. I think he was probably a very extraordinary person and a legend grew surrounding his story as has happened around other historical figures that makes it impossible today to know what he said and what he did not say. And no, I don’t believe any of the miracles, though I do find it interesting that the issue for his critics was not that he was a charlatan and not really healing anybody but that he was doing so on the Sabbath. If he existed, a historian would have to conclude that he was probably a healer of some sort or another. But raising the dead does not seem to be something that human experience tells us is possible depending on how you define “dead.” But of course, I remain open to new evidence on the matter.

Best,
Leela
He did exist, it is a very well known fact, and even people of different faith (jews/ Muslims) and Athiest acknowledge him as a real person.

The Gospels declare Jesus to be the son of the Living G-d. Thus it would be calling the Gospel writers, Liars. And that the early christians were dieng for a fake cause.

Early Christians even stormed into Pagan temples and took down their idols, an action so bold, they were cruelly killed.
Emperor Nero even crucified them and burned them alive.
Fortitude in war. Courage in Martyrdom.
They would not want to risk their lives for a Conspiracy or Lies. They Believed this to be so Undeniable true, they put their Life where there Mouth was.
  • a moment of silence to respect the Martyrs of ages past*
 
He did exist, it is a very well known fact, and even people of different faith (jews/ Muslims) and Athiest acknowledge him as a real person.

The Gospels declare Jesus to be the son of the Living G-d. Thus it would be calling the Gospel writers, Liars. And that the early christians were dieng for a fake cause.

Early Christians even stormed into Pagan temples and took down their idols, an action so bold, they were cruelly killed.
Emperor Nero even crucified them and burned them alive.
Fortitude in war. Courage in Martyrdom.
They would not want to risk their lives for a Conspiracy or Lies. They Believed this to be so Undeniable true, they put their Life where there Mouth was.
  • a moment of silence to respect the Martyrs of ages past*
Giordano Bruno was put to death for “Holding opinions contrary to the Catholic Faith and speaking against it and its ministers”. He was given countless opportunities to renounce those opinions and refused. He was burned at the stake.

I’ve read some of his writings and disagree with his opinions. Yet I respect his courage. Courage in the face of oppression is admirable even if it’s for an opinion that may not be true.
 
I notice no one responded to this, and as someone who grew up in Missouri (a border state), I know that the majority of people who fought in the Civil War - on BOTH sides - were Christians.

Believe me, there were plenty of devout Christians - both Catholic and Protestant - on both sides of the argument. And all of them cited Scripture verses to back up their views.
I never said Christians weren’t slave owners (but it was the ideals of brotherly love as espoused by Jesus that propelled people like Lincoln to put a stop to slavery), my contention theistgal is that you can’t blame Christians for slavery without conceding the fact that there were many Christians who fought in a war to end it. The issue of slavery was being fiercely fought by Christians around the world and most especially by the CC.

p.s. The NT gives nor states any imperative that we should own slaves (the two greatest commandments Jesus gave to us are anathema to this). That people misabuse the Word of God shows how necessary it is to have a teaching authority to interpret scripture.
 
Giordano Bruno was put to death for “Holding opinions contrary to the Catholic Faith and speaking against it and its ministers”. He was given countless opportunities to renounce those opinions and refused. He was burned at the stake.

I’ve read some of his writings and disagree with his opinions. Yet I respect his courage. Courage in the face of oppression is admirable even if it’s for an opinion that may not be true.
The Devil had courage too, does that make him admirable as well?
 
How can anyone who does not know Christ be ***truly happy? ***That’s what I want to know. :confused:
 
If trying to decide the truth about “God” is the example to be studied, then there are only two possibilities. Either there is a God or there is not.
Even here, though their may seem to be only two choices, we can still ask why we are being asked this particular question and not some other one? Is this really a good question or does it have some faulty premises behind it such as questions like “do you still beat your wife”? Or what is the answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe, and everything?

Personally, I asked the question about the existence or nonexistence of God a lot in my twenties and tried to figure out what a transcendent God must be like if such a God existed. And in thinking, reading, and writing, about the question, the question itself went away. It does not really seem like a question to me anymore. It’s just not a question that I even have. I now wonder if I ever would have even asked the question if I hadn’t been born into a culture where this question is pre-supposed to be meaningful and important. I no longer think it is.

Best,
Leela
 
Even here, though their may seem to be only two choices, we can still ask why we are being asked this particular question and not some other one? Is this really a good question or does it have some faulty premises behind it such as questions like “do you still beat your wife”? Or what is the answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe, and everything?

Personally, I asked the question about the existence or nonexistence of God a lot in my twenties and tried to figure out what a transcendent God must be like if such a God existed. And in thinking, reading, and writing, about the question, the question itself went away. It does not really seem like a question to me anymore. It’s just not a question that I even have. I now wonder if I ever would have even asked the question if I hadn’t been born into a culture where this question is pre-supposed to be meaningful and important. I no longer think it is.

Best,
Leela
So… where do You want to go when you die?
It doesn’t end there.
Where do you think we go?
 
So… where do You want to go when you die?
It doesn’t end there.
Where do you think we go?
I have little idea what happens when we die, but I doubt it’s anything very interesting. I suppose the experience will be much like the experience of having not yet been born. It is nothing I am concerned about. I don’t lose any more sleep over the idea of Heaven and Hell than I suppose you do about whether the Muslims or Mormons or others are right that you will be damned along with me for your lack of adherence to their religion. Trying to create a better future for my children and (someday I hope) grandchildren is of much greater interest to me than the idea of an immortal soul.

Best,
Leela
 
I have little idea what happens when we die, but I doubt it’s anything very interesting. I suppose the experience will be much like the experience of having not yet been born. It is nothing I am concerned about. I don’t lose any more sleep over the idea of Heaven and Hell than I suppose you do about whether the Muslims or Mormons or others are right that you will be damned along with me for your lack of adherence to their religion. Trying to create a better future for my children and (someday I hope) grandchildren is of much greater interest to me than the idea of an immortal soul.

Best,
Leela
So, you would rather focus on the immediate Earthly things, rather then be open to the pausibility that There is a place on the otherside where someone will spend an eternity?

near-death.com/mccormack.html

here is a link to a man who had a near death experience

( don’t rely on NDE’s, its not wise to make decisions off stories like these, I just wanted to share it.)
 
I have little idea what happens when we die, but I doubt it’s anything very interesting. I suppose the experience will be much like the experience of having not yet been born. It is nothing I am concerned about. I don’t lose any more sleep over the idea of Heaven and Hell than I suppose you do about whether the Muslims or Mormons or others are right that you will be damned along with me for your lack of adherence to their religion. Trying to create a better future for my children and (someday I hope) grandchildren is of much greater interest to me than the idea of an immortal soul.

Best,
Leela
What a dreary existence to believe that this life is all we have.
 
The Devil had courage too, does that make him admirable as well?
:eek: Are you saying that Giordano Bruno (and other heretics who were "not at all afraid to be killed in nasty ways 😉 ) are on the same level as the Devil? :eek:

I was just trying to point out that there have been people other than orthodox Christians who have had the courage to die for what they believe. I am quite surprised to find that you think that puts them on the same level as the Dark Lord himself. :confused:

Also, per your other post about slavery - yes, it is true that the abolitionists and others who sought to end slavery in the U.S. were motivated by their Christian principles. However, a clear reading of history shows that those who sought to keep slavery as an institution and reform it from the inside were ALSO motivated by their Christian principles.

And by the way, if the Church was so gung-ho in favor of ending slavery, why did it steadfastly refuse to issue any statements favorable to either side? Or perhaps you didn’t know that the U.S. bishops of the time wrote the following:
It is not for us to enquire into the causes which have led to the present unhappy condition of affairs. This enquiry belongs more appropriately to those who are directly concerned in managing the affairs of the Republic. The spirit of the Catholic Church is eminently conservative, and while her ministers rightfully feel a deep and abiding interest in all that concerns the welfare of the country, they do not think it their province to enter into the political arena. They leave to the ministers of the human sects to discuss from their pulpits and in their ecclesiastical assemblies the exciting questions which lie at the basis of most of our present and prospective difficulties. Thus, while many of the sects have divided into hostile parties on an exciting political issue, the Catholic Church has carefully preserved her unity of spirit in the bond of peace, literally knowing no North, no South, no East, no West."
 
:eek: Are you saying that Giordano Bruno (and other heretics who were "not at all afraid to be killed in nasty ways 😉 ) are on the same level as the Devil? :eek:

I was just trying to point out that there have been people other than orthodox Christians who have had the courage to die for what they believe. I am quite surprised to find that you think that puts them on the same level as the Dark Lord himself. :mad:
No I don’t put people on the same level as the devil (courage alone is not enough to admire someone though), anyways, one lone man does not a religion make. So I will ask how does Giordano Bruno have anything to do with verifying the truth claims of the Gospels through the deaths via persecution by Rome of not one but hundreds (possibly thousands) of 1st century martyrs (including the apostles who wrote most of the NT)? This was the argument Angel and Leela and I were discussing.

p.s. You’re mentioning Giordano Bruno (as a martyr for his beliefs) has nothing to do with verifying the truth claims of the gospel (of those who knew and died for Jesus and/or knew the apostles who knew Jesus and/or were pupils of the apostles).
 
Also, per your other post about slavery - yes, it is true that the abolitionists and others who sought to end slavery in the U.S. were motivated by their Christian principles. However, a clear reading of history shows that those who sought to keep slavery as an institution and reform it from the inside were ALSO motivated by their Christian principles.

And by the way, if the Church was so gung-ho in favor of ending slavery, why did it steadfastly refuse to issue any statements favorable to either side? Or perhaps you didn’t know that the U.S. bishops of the time wrote the following:
The CC was fairly young and without much clout in the U.S. because the U.S. was very much protestant and hostile to the Church (the KKK began as an anti-catholic organization). Furthermore, when I speak of the Church’s stance against slavery I take into consideration the hundreds of years of labouring against it, in fact, she herself was the first to lay the groundwork for international law concerning the rights of men.

Now those Christians who were slave owners were not motivated by Christian principles but by MONEY. The OT never endorsed chattel slavery (only indentured servitude was allowed) as we well know when we read of the Jews being freed of Eygypt’s yoke. So the plain and simple truth is that they misabused and distorted the Word of God to fill their greedy pockets (moral relativism at it’s best).

p.s. The reason I posted what I did was because Charles Darwin kept repeating the fact that Christians were slave owners (as if this somehow or another validates our theology) so I and a few others felt it necessary to remind him of the fact that many Christians fought to undermine slavery. I also thought it wise to mention that moral progress in the West would not have been feasible without the support of Christians. And that is a fact.
 
:eek: Are you saying that Giordano Bruno (and other heretics who were "not at all afraid to be killed in nasty ways 😉 ) are on the same level as the Devil? :eek:

I was just trying to point out that there have been people other than orthodox Christians who have had the courage to die for what they believe. I am quite surprised to find that you think that puts them on the same level as the Dark Lord himself. :confused:

Also, per your other post about slavery - yes, it is true that the abolitionists and others who sought to end slavery in the U.S. were motivated by their Christian principles. However, a clear reading of history shows that those who sought to keep slavery as an institution and reform it from the inside were ALSO motivated by their Christian principles.

And by the way, if the Church was so gung-ho in favor of ending slavery, why did it steadfastly refuse to issue any statements favorable to either side? Or perhaps you didn’t know that the U.S. bishops of the time wrote the following:
Then the Catholic Church would add to the Fire, and it would make the country even moer divided.

Those that fought FOR slavery, must have mis interpreted scripture.

The CCC states that People have dignity and can not be owned like property.
 
What a dreary existence to believe that this life is all we have.
Not to pick on CWBetts since this is a common conceit but if you had any idea how condescending that sounds you’d have a partial answer to the question “why are atheists so unhappy?”

As far as I can tell, atheists are not any less happy than anyone else, but we do have some serious concerns about this country’s obsession with religion. The following will give you an idea about the sort of descimination people who decline to answer or choose “none of the above” in God’s great multiple choice test deal with:

blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2008/11/atheism-a-posit.html

(Alejandro Gonzalez / USA TODAY)

"Being an atheist is not easy in this age of great public religiosity in America. Not when the overwhelming majority of Americans profess some form of belief in God. Not when many believers equate non-belief with immorality. Not when more people would automatically disqualify an atheist for the presidency (53%, according to a USA TODAY/Gallup Poll) than a gay candidate (43%), for example, or a Mormon (24%).

Anti-atheism might have found its ugliest public expression during an episode in the Illinois Legislature this spring. As atheist activist Rob Sherman attempted to testify against a $1 million state grant to a church, Rep. Monique Davis railed, “This is the Land of Lincoln where people believe in God, where people believe in protecting their children. … It’s dangerous for our children to even know that your philosophy exists! … You have no right to be here! We believe in something. You believe in destroying!”

Lest we dismiss the legislator’s harangue as an anomaly, consider the organizations that bar atheists from membership — the Boy Scouts of America and American Legion, to name two, as well as some local posts of the Veterans of Foreign Wars — and the conspicuous absence of openly atheist politicians on the national stage."
 
Lest we dismiss the legislator’s harangue as an anomaly, consider the organizations that bar atheists from membership — the Boy Scouts of America and American Legion, to name two, as well as some local posts of the Veterans of Foreign Wars — and the conspicuous absence of openly atheist politicians on the national stage."
I belong to the American Legion, and at no time was I asked about my religious belief (or lack thereof),the only determination for eligibility was having been on active duty during a conflict (WW2, Vietnam, Desert Storm, etc.).
 
So, you would rather focus on the immediate Earthly things, rather then be open to the pausibility that There is a place on the otherside where someone will spend an eternity?
Not being able to make sense of whatever distinction you’d like to make by talking about “Earthly things” it is difficult to answer directly. Consider this anaology to the situation taken from Harris:

Suppose my family and I were concinced that there was a huge diamond buried somewhere in our backyard and that we enjoyed looking for it on Sunday mornings. I tell you “That diamond gives my life meaning.” You might find our behavior strange, but you would probably not take a lot of interest in our activity until we started saying things like “I just couldn’t LIVE without believing that there was a hige diamond buried in MY back yard. How can you go even go on without believing that there is a huge diamond buried in YOUR backyard?”

Now you are a little annoyed with my diamond hunting family, but if there were any evidence that believing that there were diamonds buried in the yard made people better people, you might be tolerant of such odd behavior and ignore such condescending claims about how our lives had been turned around by our beliefs. But in the absence of such evidence, suppose that the belief in the huge diamond instead involved suspician and discrimination against those who do not believe in the Diamond or that such Diamond Hunters insisted that their believes be taught in schools. You might at that point start to think that it is about time to start speaking out on the issue and pointing out that believing in the Diamond is not such a good thing all around.

Best,
Leela
 
I belong to the American Legion, and at no time was I asked about my religious belief (or lack thereof),the only determination for eligibility was having been on active duty during a conflict (WW2, Vietnam, Desert Storm, etc.).
That is fantastic news. I hope that practice of not asking becomes universal in the American Legion.
 
Picture this:
An atheist who while out hiking fell off the side of a cliff, only to grab on to a branch that stopped him from falling to a certain death. He held on for dear life, with nothing between him and the canyon below. He decided at that moment to give prayer a chance, asking God for salvation from his fate. A voice from above told him to let go of the branch; his new faith would save him. The man thought for a moment, and then looking skyward asked, “Is there anyone else up there I can talk to about this?”
Need I say more?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top