P
pcordero
Guest
I mean, I thought an idea in Catholicism is to get out of consumerism and having a materialistic mentality, and isn’t the religious vow of poverty the same thing as communism?
I don’t think that there is anything wrong with the concept of working and sharing the goods. The problem is that communism as applied in practice is evil; basically a dictatorship of some type where nobody has any rights (religious, speech, etc.).I mean, I thought an idea in Catholicism is to get out of consumerism and having a materialistic mentality, and isn’t the religious vow of poverty the same thing as communism?
no, taking a vow of poverty as a professed religious is not the same thing as atheistic communism as a political and social system.I , and isn’t the religious vow of poverty the same thing as communism?
No, not quite. The Catholic Church is against Communism because it goes against human nature and denies the dignity of man by not permitting people to keep their fruits of the labor.Because Catholicism is a Religion, and communism forbids Religion.
God Bless
Well, first off because it’s failed everytime. lol. Second off, like a previous poster said, Communism forbids religion and strongly promotes atheism.I mean, I thought an idea in Catholicism is to get out of consumerism and having a materialistic mentality, and isn’t the religious vow of poverty the same thing as communism?
First of all, you don’t have to go communist to get away from consumerism and materialism…I mean, I thought an idea in Catholicism is to get out of consumerism and having a materialistic mentality, and isn’t the religious vow of poverty the same thing as communism?
Actually, we are against communism.We aren’t against communism, that’s what monasteries have been doing for centuries. Soviet Russia wasn’t a communist country, labor wasn’t from each according to his ability and reward to each according to his need. Read some Peter Maurin.![]()
CCC #2425 The Church has rejected the totalitarian and atheistic ideologies associated in modem times with “communism” or “socialism.”
- Continuing our reflections, and referring also to what has been said in the Encyclicals Laborem exercens and Sollicitudo rei socialis, we have to add that the fundamental error of socialism is anthropological in nature. Socialism considers the individual person simply as an element, a molecule within the social organism, so that the good of the individual is completely subordinated to the functioning of the socio-economic mechanism. Socialism likewise maintains that the good of the individual can be realized without reference to his free choice, to the unique and exclusive responsibility which he exercises in the face of good or evil. Man is thus reduced to a series of social relationships, and the concept of the person as the autonomous subject of moral decision disappears, the very subject whose decisions build the social order. From this mistaken conception of the person there arise both a distortion of law, which defines the sphere of the exercise of freedom, and an opposition to private property. A person who is deprived of something he can call “his own”, and of the possibility of earning a living through his own initiative, comes to depend on the social machine and on those who control it. This makes it much more difficult for him to recognize his dignity as a person, and hinders progress towards the building up of an authentic human community.
Marxism is a world view that only cares about materialism and denies the supernatural and man’s freedom. In the link below, go down to #7 for comparison of how religious orders practice vs Marxism.In contrast, from the Christian vision of the human person there necessarily follows a correct picture of society. According to *Rerum novarum *and the whole social doctrine of the Church, the social nature of man is not completely fulfilled in the State, but is realized in various intermediary groups, beginning with the family and including economic, social, political and cultural groups which stem from human nature itself and have their own autonomy, always with a view to the common good.
Thank you for a correct comparison.Communism as practiced in Catholic Monasteries for the last 1500 years or so is different to Communist countries. The monasteries live a Christian system where none own anything. In this form of communism it is a voluntary system, everyone in the system freely chose to be there. If someone wanted to live a different system he or she would not enter that monastery, they could live their religion while operating political and commercial systems of their own choice. In Communist States all freedom of choice for every individual disappears. Choice of religious freedom, political systems and commercial systems is removed by force from all citizens, or comrades, as the case may be. Communism in monastic systems is a voluntary and free decision. It is not forced on all citizens of the State.
And also atheist communist regimes such as the Soviet Union and China have killed over a hundred million of their own people.Well, first off because it’s failed everytime. lol.
Not counting all the aborted babies…China’s one-child policy…And also atheist communist regimes such as the Soviet Union and China have killed over a hundred million of their own people.
The word communism simply does not apply to religious life. It has also been a word applied to a socio-economo-political system along utopian lines; it was made up to describe that, and shortly thereafter appropriated by Maex and Lenin to describe their proposed system.Communism as practiced in Catholic Monasteries for the last 1500 years or so is different to Communist countries. The monasteries live a Christian system where none own anything. In this form of communism it is a voluntary system, everyone in the system freely chose to be there. If someone wanted to live a different system he or she would not enter that monastery, they could live their religion while operating political and commercial systems of their own choice. In Communist States all freedom of choice for every individual disappears. Choice of religious freedom, political systems and commercial systems is removed by force from all citizens, or comrades, as the case may be. Communism in monastic systems is a voluntary and free decision. It is not forced on all citizens of the State.