“Race” is also a very imprecise and often culturally loaded term. The socially recognized “races” in say North American society don’t necessarily have any basis in biology. We refer to “Latinos” as a race…but what are “Latinos”? They are a cultural and linguistic group, to be sure, but in terms of genetics they have various origins depending on the unique history of their country of origin. My wife is Dominican. Dominicans today are the product of 500 years of intermarriage between Spanish/European colonists, native peoples to the island, and African slaves. In the cultural norms of North America her “race” is “Latino”. Another Latino, say from Mexico, is more likely to be of mixed Spanish/European and native Indian descent, but probably without the African element. I’m a “White” Canadian. But who qualifies as white? People of European ancestry? What about Armenians? They’re from Asia but they look pretty “white” to me.
When we look at modern studies of genetics / DNA, we find that all Europeans, Asians, natives of the Americas, etc. are very closely related, descending from a small group that left Africa tens of thousands of years ago. Within Africa itself we find far greater genetic diversity because humanity has been there since the beginning while other regions were colonized much later. So from a genetic perspective, shouldn’t we have several African “races” and then one non-African “race” that includes Europeans AND Asians? That’s what the DNA shows… yet we lump all Africans together as the “Black” race. Its not biological at all…its cultural. Its a construct.
Definition of terms is important. I think this discussion would be more fruitful if it was framed as a discussion of inter-CULTURAL marriages.