Why are interracial divorce rates higher for white women than white men?
- Status
P
PLinz
Guest
P
PLinz
Guest
Are you linking those two ideas?
Would this still work?
Newsome, Melba. “A New DNA Test Can ID a Suspect’s Race, But Police Won’t Touch It.” Wired, Dec. 20, 2007.
wired.com/2007/12/ps-dna/
Also:
Human genome diversity: frequently asked questions
cell.com/trends/genetics/fulltext/S0168-9525(10)00078-8
(The interesting chart is: cell.com/cms/attachment/607255/4833573/gr2.jpg)
P
PLinz
Guest
Also, for the record, spousal homicide counts as marital dissolution.
B
BlueEyedLady
Guest
Hi Marcus! Posting for you or another Dalrockian this time?
B
BlueEyedLady
Guest
Just for the record, the Plinz account is another dedicated manoshere agitator. In the link below you can see Marcus post a bunch of CAF links to a typical redpill site in hopes of sending people over here (like he does on every dalrock thread), another poster asking him to respond on his behalf, and Marcus agreeing to do so under a spare account. The CAF link below shows Lyn’s word for word response under the Plinz name.
So basically, yet another sock puppet redpill troll account.
forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=948687
So basically, yet another sock puppet redpill troll account.
forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=948687
L
Lea101
Guest
Bless you. I was really stunned!
P
PLinz
Guest
I’m happy that you were able to get that out of your system. Do you feel better now?
T
TheAmazingGrace
Guest
Care to deny or confirm what she said?
P
PLinz
Guest
Sarcasm is best when it isn’t nonsensical.
P
PLinz
Guest
I am not the poster called “MarcusD” on “dalrock.wordpress.com”.
BlueEyedLady’s accusations are quite fanciful, particularly in regard to motivation and identity. I would recommend that she not get so worked up about these things. Personally, I think her pent-up anger from years of hanging out in places like rad-feminist forums expresses itself through conspiracy theories.
Anyway… what is the case is BlueEyedLady’s penchant for resorting to fallacies, such as the “association fallacy” (ask yourself whether her comment is making an argument in response to anything - e.g. “what’s her point?” is a good start). The use of that fallacy is a mark of intellectual laziness. I suppose you might ask her whether she can deny or confirm what I’ve said.
R
RPRPsych
Guest
Why am I not surprised?
All these “red pill” types have major problems in their pants, to borrow a phrase from a fictional character. What they really need is sildenafil + dapoxetine. (Look them up, especially the latter.
)Kudos for the detective work.
B
BlueEyedLady
Guest
I think when someone brags on another site about using a “spare account” on behalf of one of his buddies and then comes back on the same account with thinly veiled white supremacy, people should know. Especially when the other site is known to host some pretty dark, anti-catholic material.
I mean, if you aren’t even arguing in good faith…
B
BlueEyedLady
Guest
I guess that’s why I included links showing Marcus agreeing to post arguments against Xan and then a link with Lyn’s word for word response from your PLinz account.
P
PLinz
Guest
Another account on CAF asked me to post it on their behalf, stating that they were being logged out when they would try to post it. Anyone reading this can go through my posting history and see that you’re fabricating a conspiracy theory.I guess that’s why I included links showing Marcus agreeing to post arguments against Xan and then a link with Lyn’s word for word response from your PLinz account.
B
BlueEyedLady
Guest
Actually, it was to circumvent a CAF hold on new registrations. You know, the holds they put on to hinder things like this?
Just own it. You’re a professional CAF agitator with multiple accounts who has been obsessed with trying to get angry people from Dalrock to come over here for years. Every new blog of his you drop CAF links on trying to prove that feminism has killed the faith or something. You’ve been caught, just man up and admit it.
B
BlueEyedLady
Guest
I apologize for being harsh or derailing the thread. But this forum is a very unique corner of the internet in that it is well-moderated, active, and a diversity of opinions can be found here and most of the time, they’re shared in a civil manner.
When someone creates multiple accounts to bait, argue in bad faith, and link to extreme corners of the internet in hopes of getting an army to decend, the other participants should be aware that this is an ongoing problem and pattern of behavior. There are so many genuine threads and posters to engage with, why waste time with someone who’s motive just seems to be to stir the pot?
When someone creates multiple accounts to bait, argue in bad faith, and link to extreme corners of the internet in hopes of getting an army to decend, the other participants should be aware that this is an ongoing problem and pattern of behavior. There are so many genuine threads and posters to engage with, why waste time with someone who’s motive just seems to be to stir the pot?
P
PLinz
Guest
You have not demonstrated this.
That only you can see, yes? Seriously though, your use of fallacies as a method of attack is obvious. I await your evidence for your claim, nonetheless…
I’m sure you’re deeply concerned about that (even if you didn’t intentionally leave the word uncapitalized…). That said, I have no association with the blog, so it matters little to me.
What are you suggesting? I mean, your post in this thread is not related at all to the topic, which suggests it is based more in vendetta than concern - you just needed the next available opening. Spurred on by your McCarthyite zeal, your attention to detail and standards for evidence were left wanting.
P
PLinz
Guest
They already had an account. What does that have to do with account registration?Actually, it was to circumvent a CAF hold on new registrations. You know, the holds they put on to hinder things like this?
Your pet theory has no bearing on reality. You are making wild accusations (“thinly veiled white supremacy”??) that seem to be motivated by a personal vendetta (it explains the use of association fallacies and ad hominems). Right now you’re a victim of confirmation bias. Here’s a helpful link describing what that is: rationalwiki.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias
I would ask that you apologize for the trouble you’ve caused me, and the disturbance of this thread (which is against the rules, I might add).
P
PLinz
Guest
I’m starting to think this is because you don’t like something I posted in this thread or another. Is that correct? You’ve created an elaborate conspiracy theory presumably to silence me. The question from me is: Why would you do that?
- Status