Why are interracial divorce rates higher for white women than white men?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheAmazingGrace
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
First you insisted you weren’t Marcus, then you were just helping a friend who couldn’t use his account. Now, I’m McCarthy. 🤷 Regardless, anyone who wants to can click the link and ctrl+f to your name and watch you explain that registration is closed, but you’ll post for him under a spare account. They can also ctrl+f for your name on almost any Dalrock thread dating back years and see your obsessive efforts firsthand.

I personally think it’s fascinating. How many accounts do you have? Why the persistence in getting people over here? Why did you discontinue your own blog, where you regularly posted examples of CAF links you thought were spreading evil?
 
First you insisted you weren’t Marcus, then you were just helping a friend who couldn’t use his account.
Those two facts are consistent - I am not the poster called “MarcusD” on “dalrock.wordpress.com” and I did post something on behalf of another CAF user (who is not my friend, but a stranger, for the record - but I don’t think you’ve demonstrated any concern for the record so far). I’ve obviously been swept into your conspiracy theory.

If you have problems with a poster on a blog outside CAF, then I advise that you take it up with them.
 
Those two facts are consistent - I am not the poster called “MarcusD” on “dalrock.wordpress.com” and I did post something on behalf of another CAF user (who is not my friend, but a stranger, for the record - but I don’t think you’ve demonstrated any concern for the record so far). I’ve obviously been swept into your conspiracy theory.

If you have problems with a poster on a blog outside CAF, then I advise that you take it up with them.
So Marcus agreeing to post it word for word and then it being posted is a coincidence? And you did agree to do it, but just not as Marcus? Not what the paper trail shows. In fact, you were even publicly getting his responses and then coming over here to post for him.

No worries on your denials, anyone can follow the link and read.
 
So Marcus agreeing to post it word for word and then it being posted is a coincidence?
You are not reading what I am writing.
And you did agree to do it, but just not as Marcus?
I agreed to post the comment on behalf of another CAF user. I had no idea it came from a blog. That’s it.
Not what the paper trail shows.
It’s not what your theory posits.
No worries on your denials, anyone can follow the link and read.
Yes, they can, obviously. Anyone can go through my posting record and verify what I am saying.

You seem obsessed with the veracity of your conspiracy theory and are hellbent on making me the main character in it.
 
You are not reading what I am writing.

I agreed to post the comment on behalf of another CAF user. I had no idea it came from a blog. That’s it.

It’s not what your theory posits.

Yes, they can, obviously. Anyone can go through my posting record and verify what I am saying.

You seem obsessed with the veracity of your conspiracy theory and are hellbent on making me the main character in it.
 
The above are the highlights, but anyone can go read the full saga.
 
That’s true, but I’m just sick of these guys coming over and claiming plausible deniability when they plan this stuff publicly. Almost every family life thread is posted over there by Marcus to ‘expose’ this site, and it results in a lot of trolling and vitriol.

As an online community, I would like to see the regular family life posters be just a little more skeptical of posters with extreme views. A lot of it seems like an intentional distraction.

The mods do a great job, but they can’t handle everything (like multiple accounts and sending troops over), so all the rest of us can do is be aware and careful.
 
That’s true, but I’m just sick of these guys coming over and claiming plausible deniability
If it happens all the time, I’m sure you have examples of other users. But I doubt it. Your theory is held together by confirmation bias and, seemingly, a desire to attack and/or silence me. “Plausible deniability” is probably reality calling.
when they plan this stuff publicly. Almost every family life thread is posted over there by Marcus to ‘expose’ this site, and it results in a lot of trolling and vitriol.
If you have a problem with their behavior, go tell them that. Otherwise, don’t try to pin it on me as a way of either making it seem like you’re doing something useful or as a way to silence me.
skeptical of posters with extreme views
For someone with extreme views, it’s pretty ironic that you’d say that.

And I still don’t know how or why you are so familiar with blogs from “extreme corners of the internet”, or why you read them, follow them, and ostensibly know so much about their participants. This whole thing just seems surreal. How is someone able to concoct such an elaborate conspiracy theory of a network of accounts coordinating “troops” to be sent over from another website to CAF threads for years? How are you privy to the entirety of this “operation” that only you seem to know about?
 
If you have a problem with their behavior, go tell them that. Otherwise, don’t try to pin it on me as a way of either making it seem you’re doing something useful or as a way to silence me.

For someone with extreme views, it’s pretty ironic that you’d say that.

And I still don’t know how or why you are so familiar with blogs from “extreme corners of the internet”, or why you read them, follow them, and ostensibly know so much about their participants.
I Google my own screen name with a few keywords every once in awhile. Getting a shout out in the comments on a site like Dalrock is always a badge of honor:D

Seriously though, why are you desperately trying to make this about me? The pics are posted, there’s really no way to talk your way out of this one. Nothing you can say about me makes those facts go away. Just stand by what you say and take rsponsibility.
 
I Google my own screen name with a few keywords every once in awhile. Getting a shout out in the comments on a site like Dalrock is always a badge of honor:D

Seriously though, why are you desperately trying to make this about me? The pics are posted, there’s really no way to talk your way out of this one. Nothing you can say about me makes those facts go away. Just stand by what you say and take rsponsibility.
👍
 
I Google my own screen name with a few keywords every once in awhile. Getting a shout out in the comments on a site like Dalrock is always a badge of honor:D
You seem to know a lot more about a fringe site than your explanation works for.
Seriously though, why are you desperately trying to make this about me? The pics are posted, there’s really no way to talk your way out of this one. Nothing you can say about me makes those facts go away. Just stand by what you say and take rsponsibility.
It’s your conspiracy theory which you are doubling down on. You are the one using ad hominems and association fallacies against me for something I posted in this thread that you don’t happen to like. Your claims are entirely unfalsifiable, which should be enough for anyone to question your theory.
The pics are posted, there’s really no way to talk your way out of this one.
What is fascinating to me is how completely you believe your own theory.
 
I wish BlueEyedLady had been a bit more cautious with her accusations and had not resorted to harassment.
 
You seem to know a lot more about a fringe site than your explanation works for.

It’s your conspiracy theory which you are doubling down on. You are the one using ad hominems and association fallacies against me for something I posted in this thread that you don’t happen to like. Your claims are entirely unfalsifiable, which should be enough for anyone to question your theory.

What is fascinating to me is how completely you believe your own theory.
Unbelievable. Your only answer to the screenshots is “Nu-uh!”

Ok. Cool. Everyone can make up their own minds. The pics and links are there.🤷
 
It’s your conspiracy theory which you are doubling down on. You are the one using ad hominems and association fallacies against me for something I posted in this thread that you don’t happen to like. Your claims are entirely unfalsifiable, which should be enough for anyone to question your theory.
You posted it. You admit you posted it for someone else. You just don’t admit you’re Marcus. Again, the pics are posted.
 
You posted it. You admit you posted it for someone else. You just don’t admit you’re Marcus. Again, the pics are posted.
You write “admit” like you’re actually making a case that no one else could make. If you’re trying to play detective, please leave me out of it. Find consenting people to play make-believe with.
 
Also, on the topic of fallacies, I’m not saying your wrong because you hang out on those sites. I’m stating the fact that you have admitted that this is a “spare account” and that you are always trying to get your buddies over here. Again, not a fallacy. I’ve posted the pics of Marcus agreeing to post and then confirming the post to Lyn under this account. That’s also not a fallacy.
 
You write “admit” like you’re actually making a case that no one else could make. If you’re trying to play detective, please leave me out of it. Find consenting people to play make-believe with.
Pics are still posted:cool:
 
Unbelievable. Your only answer to the screenshots is “Nu-uh!”
How can you actually misrepresent what I’ve said just in this thread? Do you think the readers here are dumb? Apparently you do. Either that or you have reading comprehension problems. It really doesn’t demonstrate your attention to detail. Is it your theory that is “unbelievable”? Is it “unbelievable” that others don’t think you’re right? Is it “unbelievable” that maybe you’re wrong?

You seem hellbent on pushing your theory regardless of what anyone says. Everything anyone says confirms your theory. Such an approach cannot be reasoned with, and I don’t have any interest in reasoning with an unreasonable person. Your tactic to use ad hominems and other fallacies in place of an actual argument should be enough for an intelligent person to see through your claims and realize that you are trying to cloak a personal attack against with a plausible motive. You claim that you are mentioned on “dalrock.wordpress.com” - are you just trying to take it out on someone? If so, maybe you shouldn’t Google yourself so much (it’s a bit narcissistic, too).
 
Also, on the topic of fallacies, I’m not saying your wrong because you hang out on those sites. I’m stating the fact that you have admitted that this is a “spare account” and that you are always trying to get your buddies over here. Again, not a fallacy. I’ve posted the pics of Marcus agreeing to post and then confirming the post to Lyn under this account. That’s also not a fallacy.
I think it’s confirmed that you have troubles with reading comprehension or memory, or both. If not that, you are being disingenuous.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top