Why are interracial divorce rates higher for white women than white men?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheAmazingGrace
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
PRmerger said:
Are you talking about some “thinly veiled white supremacy” remarks on this thread?

If so, I have to say, I haven’t seen anything in PLinz’s remarks here that would suggest that.
Click to expand...
I said nothing of the sort anywhere, let alone in this thread (as BlueEyedLady alleges dishonestly).

BlueEyedLady is intent on smearing me because she disagrees with my views (or I simply don’t agree with hers) or, she has decided to make me the focus of her conspiracy theory and she felt that she needed to embellish it further than she already has. She was quite intent on “taking me out”, and her lack of attention to, or care for, the truth really slipped out with the racial supremacy allegation, which anyone can see is ridiculous and verifiably false. If you go through all the posts in this thread, you will see she has lied several times and has deflected from those lies with distractions and disingenuousness

In the end, the desire to hold the existing evidence as proof (rather than just evidence) is a reflection of her desire to push her theory, rather than a commitment to truth, honesty, or due process. To her, it would seem, my reputation on here is worth sacrificing. To her it is a win-win - it doesn’t matter who I am, she doesn’t like me, and that’s good enough for her. It’s really quite disgusting behavior on her part (particularly the racial supremacy allegation), and I hope that people’s desire to believe her conspiracy theory doesn’t lead them to rush to conclusions that aren’t supported and to overlook her lies.
 
Xantippe said:
Yep.

Basically, the guys at Dalrock (which is a big “Christian” manosphere blog community) believe that CAF is a liberal feminist hell hole.

For whatever reason, some of those guys believe that it is totally kosher and Christian to come over to CAF and troll.
Click to expand...
No doubt you are still angry over our last exchange (forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=967771). Are you going to support BlueEyedLady’s conspiracy theory in the name of your personal vendetta against me? It’s obvious what you’re trying to do, and it’s quite despicable.
 
PLinz said:
No, I do not have multiple accounts on CAF.
Click to expand...
Fair enough.

I accept your word.

I certainly hope there isn’t any mental gymnastics going on.

There is a child who, when asked by his mother, “Did you brush your teeth?”
He responded, “Yes!”

But he actually hadn’t brushed his teeth that morning.

He knew what his mother was asking, and he mislead her…

His answer: Yes! was actually to the question, “Have you ever brushed your teeth?”
Or "Did you brush your teeth…sometime in your life?

But he knew that his mom was actually asking if he had brushed his teeth this morning.

🤷
 
PRmerger said:
So I’m confused as to how you posted something that was attributed to Marcus on the pic cited by BEL, verbatim?

How did this happen? :confused:
Click to expand...
He already explained that - I fabricated the pic:rolleyes:

If you have any doubts, feel free to check the backup links I posted.
 
BlueEyedLady said:
He already explained that - I fabricated the pic:rolleyes:

If you have any doubts, feel free to check the backup links I posted.
Click to expand...
I just want to say thank you again…to you and also to Xantippe…for helping an elderly priest to understand what is really going on, in this forum, behind certain usernames. You have helped me quite a lot by this and I am very grateful.

I always enjoy your posts.
 
Don_Ruggero said:
I just want to say thank you again…to you and also to Xantippe…for helping an elderly priest to understand what is really going on, in this forum, behind certain usernames. You have helped me quite a lot by this and I am very grateful.

I always enjoy your posts.
Click to expand...
Thank you for teaching me that ‘Don’ means Father and for always being willing to answer my questions!
 
Evidence does not become proof of a claim when it simply does not refute that claim.

Besides that, BlueEyedLady openly and shamelessly fabricated numerous lies in this thread that are verifiably false (particularly the most egregious one, that I’m a “white supremacist”), and yet people are overlooking that because one of the other claims she’s made seems to appeal to them.
 
PRmerger said:
Yep. I didn’t see that, either.
Click to expand...
That’s what I took the photoshopped pic of my text box to mean with the line “totally irrefutable”. Like, “see, I can make pics too”.

He insists the pics shouldn’t be talked about because he can make them too. But that pesky internet trail just sticks around.
 
BlueEyedLady said:
That’s what I took the photoshopped pic of my text box to mean with the line “totally irrefutable”. Like, “see, I can make pics too”.

He insists the pics shouldn’t be talked about because he can make them too. But that pesky internet trail just sticks around.
Click to expand...
Oh. It didn’t show up on my feed. It just showed an icon of a pic.
 
BlueEyedLady said:
That’s what I took the photoshopped pic of my text box to mean with the line “totally irrefutable”. Like, “see, I can make pics too”.

He insists the pics shouldn’t be talked about because he can make them too. But that pesky internet trail just sticks around.
Click to expand...
I photoshopped nothing. I did not manipulate any images with any image editing program.

Stop lying! :mad:

And again: Evidence does not become proof of a claim when it simply does not refute that claim.
 
PLinz said:
I photoshopped nothing. I did not manipulate any images with any image editing program.

Stop lying! :mad:

And again: Evidence does not become proof of a claim when it simply does not refute that claim.
Click to expand...
Okey dokey.

So what was the point when you posted your image?
 
PLinz said:
Evidence does not become proof of a claim when it simply does not refute that claim.

Besides that, BlueEyedLady openly and shamelessly fabricated numerous lies in this thread that are verifiably false (particularly the most egregious one, that I’m a “white supremacist”), and yet people are overlooking that because one of the other claims she’s made seems to appeal to them.
Click to expand...
You know, when you were initially caught you could have saved a lot of face (relatively, at least) by just gloating that it doesn’t matter because as the Dalrock link shows, you keep spare accounts anyway.

But, arguing against the documentation instead of owning up to the things you’ve said is definitely another option. It’s getting pretty funny though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top