T
TOmNossor
Guest
Oh my!TOmNossor:![]()
All LDS are not happy? Really? All of them? Every single one? You can’t find one LDS person who is happy.First, all LDS are not happy and LDS do have problems. To suggest otherwise would be dishonest.
I think you are the one being dishonest.
Someone said “All Catholics” they know were happy.
I was saying that “All LDS” are not happy. I meant that some LDS are happy and some LDS are not happy thus ALL LDS are not happy.
I submit your statement that I am being dishonest is inappropriate and had you read what I wrote in its entirety you would know this.
Because I am feeling ornery (after being accused of being dishonest by you), why don’t I point out something that I believe to be true.
The way you read that first statement and then choose to call me dishonest is evidence of two things. First your willingness to ascribe to me negative things with the slightest reason.
Second, your unwillingness to read an entire post and/or try to synthesize what it means.
Further, let me suggest that your anti-Mormonism is a product of EXACTLY these two characteristics.
Now, I suspect you are not universally uncharitable when you read things from religions you reject or desire to reject AND I suspect you have even done more than cursory reading in some cases.
That being said, I TRULY believe one of the reasons folks leave the CoJCoLDS is that they find easy answers (simple not taking into context the entire issue) and they assign to historical individuals entirely one-sided characters. I suppose the CoJCoLDS is somewhat to blame here because when I try to teach morals to my Sunday School class I use historical and scriptural examples that produce “easy answers” and are largely “one-sided.” I however regularly remind my Sunday School class that I am teaching scriptures and history for the purpose of teaching LDS how to live moral lives, not to produce scholars or historians (I also almost get giddy when folks ask tough questions so such is encouraged).
Anyway, I was not being dishonest and I was quite taken aback that you would suggest this. As I have re-read this with an attempt to be charitable, I think perhaps you were joking. If so, then I TRULY believe that the general trends concerning critics of my church are true in many cases, but if you were merely joking then it was not you specifically calling me dishonest (which happens here too often) for no good reason and I hope to not offend you. (Actually, I have no desire to offend you even if you call me dishonest, I just want to make the point I made and say I was not being dishonest).
Charity, TOm
Last edited: