Why are muslims so violent?

  • Thread starter Thread starter VARC
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes. My concern is with the most effective ways of stopping those who wish to spread jihad agaisnt the west. As I’ve said before, the best way to do this is to take away their income by not purchasing oil from petrodictators in the mideast.
So are you retracting your statement that Islamic violence of the Middle Ages and onward was “local and not widely practiced.” Otherwise, I am still confused and would like clarification as to what you meant. It is a fact that Muslim wars were not local and were widely practiced. Spain, Malta, Vienna, Byzantine Empire, etc.
 
So are you retracting your statement that Islamic violence of the Middle Ages and onward was “local and not widely practiced.” Otherwise, I am still confused and would like clarification as to what you meant. It is a fact that Muslim wars were not local and were widely practiced. Spain, Malta, Vienna, Byzantine Empire, etc.
I am clarifying my statement. My comment was focusing the time period of the 20th century onward. I would point out that the question asked in this thread is why muslims are violent. Not why muslim history was so violent.
 
All Muslim people are not violent. All Catholic people are not violent. All Jewish people are not violent. There are nuts in every tree, even ours.:rolleyes: Glass houses and all that stuff…
 
Because I don’t think you’re interested, so why take the time? 🤷
I am interested and would like to hear what you say. Here is more evidence of Islam being a religion of violence, not peace. I am genuinely curious as to how you reconcile the Koran with the supposed peacefulness of Islam. Islam is about violence and spreading it forcefully against the “unbelievers,” until they “repent.”

From the Koran:

4:95 “Not equal are those believers who sit (at home) and receive no hurt, and those who strive and fight in the cause of Allah with their goods and their persons. Allah hath granted a grade higher to those who strive and fight with their goods and persons than to those who sit (at home). Unto all (in Faith) Hath Allah promised good: But those who strive and fight Hath He distinguished above those who sit (at home) by a special reward

5:33 “The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter”

8:12 "Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): “I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instil terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers:** smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them**.” "

8:38 - 39 "Say to the Unbelievers, if (now) they desist (from Unbelief), their past would be forgiven them; but if they persist, the punishment of those before them is already (a matter of warning for them). And fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah altogether and everywhere; but if they cease, verily Allah doth see all that they do. "

9:5 "But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, an seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practise regular charity, then open the way for them: for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful. "

9:123 "O ye who believe! fight the unbelievers who gird you about, and let them find firmness in you: and know that Allah is with those who fear Him. "

25:52 “Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness, with the (Qur’an).”
 
Sister Amy, Read Post #169. She’s looking for the correct interpretation of those verses. 🙂
Thanks! I really should learn to read back…

While I was browsing back pages I noticed someone remarked on the term “Paki.” It’s more or less a pretty offensive slur in the UK (not so much in the US–there’s a shirt out there that says on it “Good things come in small Pakis” that I’ve seen a lot of Muslim girls wear).

On to Post #169:

I said I wanted people to learn the correct “interpretation” of these instead of following their whims on them.
9:29 “Fight against those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.”
47:4 “When ye meet the unbelievers, smite at their necks”
4:74 “To him who fighteth in the cause of Allah soon shall we give him a reward of great value.”
And from the Hadith:
Allah 's Apostle said, " I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,’ and whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,’ his life and property will be saved by me except for Islamic law, and his accounts will be with Allah, (either to punish him or to forgive him.)"
Now, some people might think I’m someone who gets up and says “Islam is peace” all the time… but I know (or at least hope) that those of you who read my posts more carefully know that is not my mantra at all. I don’t think it’s useful to classify any religion as violent or peaceful, and Islam is definitely not a pacifist religion.

And there are over 6000 verses in the Qur’an. Whoever made this post picked three. Three verses out of 6,000.

And while of course there are more than three verses about fighting, it certainly isn’t the bulk of Islam, or of the Qur’an. And while I do think it’s important for people to learn the interpretation of verses such as these, I myself fall into the category of people who need to learn, and not of those who are qualified to teach. So I had to do some research for this answer… if you can bear with me for a moment.

Of course Islam allows fighting, at times it even mandates fighting. This should not be a surprise to anyone, nor do I think it is something exclusive to Islam or something which should be considered strange. Yet to avoid going off-topic I’ll not continue on that train of thought.

The following page is a short article written by a well-known scholar in Saudi Arabia, and is a good resource on this topic. I’d advise against accepting everything on the site because not everything is approved by a scholar. But this piece is.

So let me get to it…

There is fighting, in Islam, against disbelievers, oppressors, and innovators–and this developed in a series of stages. The first stage wasn’t fighting at all, when Muhammad (saws) became a Prophet and warned the people around him. For 10 years Muhammad (saws) preached and warned without any fighting, instructing patience and forbearance even while the Muslims were being persecuted.

Then permission was given for him to migrate and leave the city where they were plotting to kill him. And then permission was given to fight (because they were being attacked, their things had been stolen, etc.) And then the Muslims were commanded to fight those who fought them, and refrain from fighting those who didn’t fight them. And then fighting was commanded against specific groups of people to implement Islam not at an individual level but at a state-wide or nation-wide level. After this fighting was commanded, disbelievers fell into 3 categories: those with whom there was a truce or peace treaty; those with whom he was at war; and those who lived under the rule and protection of the Islamic state. (This is from Ibn al-Qayyim, btw.)

Now, I think this context is important for Muslims to understand in particular, so they don’t start foolishly picking out verses from the Qur’an that they want to follow, while leaving those they don’t want.
 
I have a very simply question, if someone could bear with me long enough to answer it…

Are Americans violent?

Could I ask legitimately, “Why are Americans so violent?” or declare that “America is a nation of violence.”

Or would you argue that Americans are only trying to defend themselves and make safe their way of life?

Do Muslims not have that right as well, to defend themselves against aggression, and to make safe their way of life? At least?

Some food for thought:
mujahideenryder.net/2008/12/17/i-wish-that-shoe-hit-bush-americans-please-watch-this-video/

(Warning: it contains some very bad language.)
 
I have a very simply question, if someone could bear with me long enough to answer it…

Are Americans violent?

Could I ask legitimately, “Why are Americans so violent?” or declare that “America is a nation of violence.”

Or would you argue that Americans are only trying to defend themselves and make safe their way of life?

Do Muslims not have that right as well, to defend themselves against aggression, and to make safe their way of life? At least?

Some food for thought:
mujahideenryder.net/2008/12/17/i-wish-that-shoe-hit-bush-americans-please-watch-this-video/

(Warning: it contains some very bad language.)
Nope you couldn’t argue that. There is a difference between self defense and calling people to extreme violence. Last time I checked the Constitution doesn’t mention smiting at people’s necks, waging war on others until they accept certain beliefs, give greater honor to warriors (as opposed to followers of peace), call for the execution / crucifixion / mutilation / exile of others, and advocate the slaying of “unbelievers.” Islam’s Koran does. It is a religion of violence.
 
You can spin it any way you want. THe fact is that it is petro dollars that are financing the spread of the most hateful and fringe elements of Islam and that we are doing it at a time when funded terrorists can do more damage than ever before in history.
Oh, I agree that petro dollars are funding this current phase of jihad. but, to say that before oil and petro dollars the jihad was local is ‘spinning’!

I would surmise though that given the koran and jihad - it would just be done at a lower level than before. The Grand mufti Husseini, Qutb, etc were all instigators of this latest jihad and they were starting off without the petro dollars. The (bad) fruits of their labor has been what we got now helped along by the oil money.

To even say that the times of ‘peace’ with muslims is also misleading. Regular pograms were conducted (eg: Palestine Massacre: The forgotten pogrom: Safed 1834). this is just one example. Don’t forget the Armenian Christians that were slaughtered, or any other group of peoples slaughtered by muslims!

They didn’t have petro dollars during those times.
 
Nope you couldn’t argue that. There is a difference between self defense and calling people to extreme violence. Last time I checked the Constitution doesn’t mention smiting at people’s necks, waging war on others until they accept certain beliefs, give greater honor to warriors (as opposed to followers of peace), call for the execution / crucifixion / mutilation / exile of others, and advocate the slaying of “unbelievers.” Islam’s Koran does. It is a religion of violence.
One word response:

Iraq.
 
Also,never forget the jews were VERY violent,even genocidal. So don’t plop in right on the Muslims. Christians haven’t been real niceynice either,
 
I ain’t Ralph…but follow the money. that pretty much always answers such questions.
 
All Muslim people are not violent. All Catholic people are not violent. All Jewish people are not violent. There are nuts in every tree, even ours.:rolleyes: Glass houses and all that stuff…
Agreed. The difference being that the nuts in my (jewish) tree aren’t being given hundreds of millions of dollars to build schools all over the world and preach why killing others is holy.
 
One word response:

Iraq.
A new book out called, The Secret Relationship between Saddam and al Qaida by Louis Fairmont, once again states the relationship between Saddam and Al Qaeda.

The Party of Defeat’s Top Five Lies About Iraq

The link between Saddam and Al Qaeda
  • Saddam and al Qaida were working together since 1990
  • Iraq was financing, training, and carrying out operations with al Qaida since the 1990’s
  • al Qaida and the Arab Mujahideen were located in Iraq since 1995
  • Saddam in his own words says he gave the order for the 1993 World Trade Center attack.
  • An Iraqi agent met with a 9/11 hijacker prior to the 9/11 attack
  • WMDs were in Iraq up until Operation Iraqi Freedom
Video on WMDs in Iraq

Video on Al Qaeda being in Iraq since 1995
 
Also,never forget the jews were VERY violent,even genocidal. So don’t plop in right on the Muslims. Christians haven’t been real niceynice either,
I seem to have forgotten that. Still can’t remember us being genocidal. But this thread isn’t about judaism.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top