M
Melodeonist
Guest
BYOB. Bring your own Bible. We got Missals for Mass, but reading the Bible and praying the Rosary before Mass is always a good idea.
That, and one or another of the Bible apps on my phoneMy Kindle Bible gets more use than my paper one. Nearly always close at hand.
Aboslute nonsense. The Mass drips with Scripture, Scripture oozes from the walls of the building, and we are highly encouraged to study the Sacred Scriptures. The Catecism saysAnd that places the importance pretty low on the spectrum - no formal teaching, no commentaries, no guidance on what exactly you ARE reading and certainly no oversight from the Church.
A reputation that is totally, utterly and in all ways completely undeserved.And you must admit that Catholics have a reputation for not allowing the people in the pew, as it were, to read the Bible on their own.
Your neighbor hasn’t the slightest clue what she’s talking about.My neighbor - in her 70s - says that ‘only the priests are allowed to have a Bible.’
Wow! I can’t believe she said that… All the Catholics I know have bibles in their homes and read and study them…My neighbor - in her 70s - says that ‘only the priests are allowed to have a Bible.’ It doesn’t bode well for the concern of the OP’s parents.
But if that is what she was taught as a child in the 40’s and 50’s, then of course she is going to believe it. (And just to put at rest a previous poster’s comments, her mind is quite sharp. But thank you for assuming otherwise.)The neighbor is kind of young to have such a distorted belief … that only priests are allowed to have a Bible.
That’s actually not standard in Protestant churches, either.This is a genuine question and in no way intended to be judgmental or offensive. I had a long conversation with my parents on the phone last night about my decision to explore Catholicism and one of their number one questions was why there are no Bibles in the pews of Catholic churches. While it’s not a big stumbling block for me personally, my parents seem to think it should be red flag. Why is that pews in Catholic churches do not have Bibles?
Yeah, sounds more like somebody making up a good excuse for herself not to bother reading it.The neighbor is kind of young to have such a distorted belief … that only priests are allowed to have a Bible.
The fact that she was poorly catechized does not make a stereotype true. If she was taught that a certain race was inferior in the 40s and 50s, people would be blaming her for not expanding her thinking and just going on what she was taught. However, she makes a totally incorrect statement about Catholicism based on wrong stuff she was taught, and somehow this is our problem to solve?But if that is what she was taught as a child in the 40’s and 50’s, then of course she is going to believe it.
You realize, don’t you, that this was a common teaching, especially in that era? And you realize that when the Catholic Church teaches something through official institutions such as Catholic schools (and presumably by Catholic nuns), there is very little leeway for challenging that teaching? Isn’t that in the rule book? Don’t challenge the Church?However, she makes a totally incorrect statement about Catholicism based on wrong stuff she was taught, and somehow this is our problem to solve?
We have provided you with an entire thread of evidence that this was NOT a common teaching at least after WWII and possibly even before. To the extent I have heard about it at all, it’s rooted back in the 30s and your friend is too young to have been around.You realize, don’t you, that this was a common teaching, especially in that era? And you realize that when the Catholic Church teaches something through official institutions such as Catholic schools (and presumably by Catholic nuns), there is very little leeway for challenging that teaching? Isn’t that in the rule book? Don’t challenge the Church?
This reminds me. I went to a public school, and a few years of Latin was required of all students. I wasn’t very good at it but I could translate a gospel passage from the Latin if I had to.ComplineSanFran:![]()
This is not true for at least two reasons:Well, those of you who were Roman Catholic a hundred years ago didn’t hear the Scriptural readings during the Mass. They were in Latin.
- many people, esp the educated, understood Latin - esp to get by in Church. And when I say educated, I don’t mean just college.
- Some in grade school learned Latin, and almost everyone who went to High School learned Latin.
- And if they went to Catholic School, they studied Latin from first grade.
- during the Sermon, many priests (if not most) re-read the readings in the vernacular as part of his sermon. And if he didn’t read it word for word, he still did a though homily regarding the reading.
It may have been a "common teaching " of non-Catholics and anti-Catholics about the Church. That does not mean that it was ever an actual teaching of the Church.You realize, don’t you, that this was a common teaching, especially in that era? And you realize that when the Catholic Church teaches something through official institutions such as Catholic schools (and presumably by Catholic nuns), there is very little leeway for challenging that teaching? Isn’t that in the rule book? Don’t challenge the Church?
I am not going to correct a very devout woman. And I am not perpetuating a wrong stereotype. It was obviously taught that laity shouldn’t be reading the Bible. And now that has changed.Yet you keep insisting that this was somehow the norm. It sounds like you are bound and determined to believe this and perpetuate a wrong stereotype yourself rather than correcting your friend and accepting that maybe you had a misconception here.
Bingo. It’s what Protestants thought ABOUT us, mostly, because our reading and use of the Bible was not similar to their reading and use of the Bible.It may have been a "common teaching " of non-Catholics and anti-Catholics about the Church. That does not mean that it was ever an actual teaching of the Church.