This is my reasoning as well, the case for the resurrection is strong and too convincing, and it’s the foundation for my faith. I would see no reason to follow a religion at all if it wasn’t for the resurrection as the resurrection confirms everything about Christianity, and to an extent, parts of Judaism. Sure, many so called “prophets” have come and gone, but why should I believe one over the other? What did Muhammad do to prove himself as a true prophet over someone like Joseph Smith? Jesus is the only one who seems to have actually proven himself in his resurrection. Christianity is unique in that it actually has something that other religions don’t in this regard. Another thing too is, maybe you can disprove orthodox Christianity, and strip away doctrine by doctrine (the virgin birth, the inspiration of the Bible, the Trinity, etc.), but you can’t actually disprove Christianity as Christianity, you can only do that by disproving the resurrection, which has always failed. So at least I know the basics of my faith are true, the other aspects are faith based, but they are given much more credence because of the resurrection, and no other religion has anything like this for its doctrines. As St. Paul so wonderfully puts it, “…if Christ has not been raised, your faith is worthless and you are still in your sins.” (1 Corinthians 15:18).