WHY ARE YOU NOT CATHOLIC?
This poll lists different choices as to what prevents you*** intellectually*** from joining the Catholic Church. There may be practical issues relating to the intellectual issue, but this poll is more about Catholic doctrine and beliefs than issues regarding family or culture, for example.
I am genuinely interested, so any respectful feedback relating to your choice would be greatly appreciated.
PLEASE, in a post, identify
- (1) Your current religious adherence
- (2) Why you are interested in Catholicism – after all, you are here at CAF
- Agnostic/Weak Atheist
- I would rather not be Atheistic
I obviously am not convinced about the truths of Christianity. It appears too convenient that it caters to our greatest wants, offers to allay our darkest fears, and then attempts to frighten us into earthly submission to a human-run organization. I wish it had stuck with the carrot and not brought in the stick, for in reading between the lines God appears to have a very big problem with people disagreeing with him. Egocentricity aside, it seems difficult to imagine why an all-loving being would even need to exercise the slightest coercion to be able to welcome 100% of humanity to his bosom.
After all, how many among us would openly scoff at the offer of a beloved relative to take us to the movies out of love? Why then would any of us put up even the slightest resistance to being welcomed into a heavenly and eternal bliss with our most favorite and cherished almighty father?
Unless perhaps he simply appears as an absentee parent…or an angry, manipulative, and potentially domineering abuser…?
After all, who might be able to offer real love and affection to one who might proclaim unto them: “Love me or else!” ??? Which beloved father casually singles out half the family to leave behind when moving out of state? Who might only embrace one’s best-behaved children for the rest of their lives?
Who might put conditions on
unconditional love?
Yet Catholicism seems also to have a richness to it…it appears to encourage individuals to have a caring concern for the world and its peoples…to teach individuals to be good…to strive for personal improvement…to refine their spirits and concentrate on confessing sins so as not to repeat them (which is also therapeutic)…to provide a place of sanctuary during times of stress…to provide a place to share one’s difficulties…to be non-judgmental when it counts…to provide a priesthood whose primary objective is the salvation of oneself and one’s loved ones…and to provide individuals with rites of passage that appear meaningful and helpful (especially when dealing with the deaths of loved ones through the very hopeful communion of saints). It also provides a Purgatory as a faint hope clause–which is much appreciated wiggle room for one like me…
Further, contrast a site such as this with one that might instead exist solely to promote answers in support of atheism…in which place is one more likely to feel the love and respect of one’s
opponents…let alone one’s confederates? At which site is one more apt to feel scorn for a differing point of view? At which site might the members be more likely to lean towards humility versus self-congratulations?
For do not such things also speak a kind of truth? A truth regarding the society to which one must needs aspire simply by one’s membership to same? Do not such truths potentially matter as keenly as abstract philosophical or specific intellectual reasons in dispute of a creator?
For I would submit to you that if given the choice between a reality that is cold, heartless, and sterile versus an imaginary that is warm, loving, and joy-filled, which might
actually appear to truly be the greater intellectual triumph? The greater truth as intuited by the human spirit?
Further, if the human spirit might imagine such an improved possibility over that which might be clinically tested, how far away must one reason that such a fictional reality might ultimately find its source in a far deeper and distant fact than attainable by science of any degree? For if God is to exist, is it truly that unreasonable to suppose that
his science might actually be attainable solely through the imagination–what might, in other circles, be termed
faith?