Why can't we confess... by phone?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DavidFilmer
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Br. Rich SFO:
WE may be searching for an answer that does not exist. It may very well be possible to confess over the phone. However it is not valid because the discipline of the Sacraments says it’s not.
Br.Rich, I have never known you to be wrong (and, of course, I pray you are right). But, may I ask, where exactly in Magesterial teaching does it stipulate this?
 
40.png
DavidFilmer:
Br.Rich, I have never known you to be wrong (and, of course, I pray you are right). But, may I ask, where exactly in Magesterial teaching does it stipulate this?
As someone already mentioned John Paul II stated that Sacramental Confession without the person and the priest being personally present with one another is invalid. It may be in Reconciliation and Penance The Rite of Penance may also have something… It all revolves around the meaning of “being personally present”. In *Administration of the Sacraments by Halligan, O.P. *page 178 #20 it does state that the penitent’s presence is necessary.
 
Br. Rich SFO:
It all revolves around the meaning of “being personally present”.
That can be a sticky point. I can see how any particular line you draw can be arguably arbitrary, so the measure may appear to us as being subjective.

I used to be a telephone counselor for Kansas Children’s Services League, answering the Youth Crisis Hotline.

What I found, is that sometimes my presence with them on the phone could be more unitive for them than a great deal of physical presence of those who are creating the environment causing these kids to have to call me to talk.

In other words, a kind, trained, certified, or whatever qualification you want for a soul, can sometimes minister to the fears, guilts, and woes of another sould better long distance than others can do up front.

At least that holds true in a mystical sense. As far as the theology that specifies the limits of the Sacraments I don’t claim to know.

As far as those questions about whether physical presence predetermines as certain wall thickness or porosity of the screen or anything, bullet proof glass, those questions may sound silly but they are absolutely a part of the equation if we seek to claim that there is an objective definition of “personal presence.”

As long as we agree that the validity depends on things that are relative, or at least humanly immeasurable, then I don’t mind having such criteria. Realistically, most people would agree on what a physical presence is, but cannot God do anything, and would He refuse reconciliation because in an emergency situation a person called a priest on a phone and poured her heart out and begged absolution? Would a priest not have jurisdiction to make that call in an alleged crisis situation? If not, then how can this requirement be an absolute and/or objective one – if of course it is billed as such?

Alan

P.S. just to kick it up a notch, here’s one more example. Twoyears ago a girl who was a friend of my son’s at Catholic high school was struck and killed on a dark highway as she pulled her car out in front of a truck. She was distracted, believes her father, because she was talking on a cell phone. This gave me the idea. What if just before she died, she called a priest and confessed? Would that be a sacrament of penance, or would it be nothing more than an expression of her intent which could have been done without the priest present, I assume, or even to whomever she had been talking to.

As it was, she didn’t have a chance. That’s OK, I can admit I wanted to share the tale of woe as well as make a point that didn’t require the tale to be told. 😦 From what Chris told me, she had one of the most beautiful spirits at that high school; most of the school took off for her funeral, and local and national dignitaries and politicians and leaders of many faiths attended that Catholic funeral. Even in her death she brought people together. :crying:
 
Oh fer Pete’s sake…look, why would anyone want to mess with the sacrament as it is? Good grief, how about some common sense here? With the odd exception mandated by odd situations, “physically present” means “with the priest” as is currently practiced in the sacrament. This nit-picking reminds me of the worst of scholasticism, with endless and fruitless debates about such weighty matters as how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. Subjective and pointless discussions about just what “personally present” means will get us…where? And why? Are you simply curious and like to subject details to a kind of scientific method (as if this were a chemical compound, made up of precisely measurable units) for fun, or are you wanting to make confession even easier? (Feeling humbled by having to stand in line at the confessional? Self-esteem damaged by having to submit, like everyone else, to that tedious rite? Don’t like the kneelers at your church’s confessionals? Now, just for you! New!! Improved!! Fast and easy confessions!!! In between business meetings? Take care of those pesky obligations the quick and easy way, with Dial-A-Priest!!) Shzeesh…our culture is already disconnected from real, breathing human beings. We don’t need the Church to add to that.
 
40.png
Sherlock:
Are you simply curious and like to subject details to a kind of scientific method (as if this were a chemical compound, made up of precisely measurable units) for fun
Yes.

Also, by exploring these type of questions, we learn more about the faith, what makes up the essence of this particular sacrament, and the theology behind different rules and regulations.

Blindly following lock-step is what I did when I was younger. It was my discovery that these issues have been carefully thought out by great minds over the centuries which led me back to the Church after dropping away.
 
I have worked in the phone business for too many years. I never say anything into a telephone that I would not mind a stranger hearing. Unless you are the afore mentioned President of the US, you do not have a secure line. In fact, monitoring line quality is required… little telephones have big ears…
 
As a Byzantine Catholic, Confession is face to face and after the confession, the priest places the epitrachial over the penitents head and says the prayer of absolution. So your phone theory is out for us! 😃
 
40.png
Digitonomy:
Yes.

Also, by exploring these type of questions, we learn more about the faith, what makes up the essence of this particular sacrament, and the theology behind different rules and regulations.

Blindly following lock-step is what I did when I was younger. It was my discovery that these issues have been carefully thought out by great minds over the centuries which led me back to the Church after dropping away.
I’m not disputing the value of asking questions. It was asking questions that led me back to the Church, and it’s fair to say that not asking questions made it easier to leave her for as long as I did. No, what I’m griping about is the attempt to define, in some objective way, what “personal presence” is and what it is not, as if there is some concrete, mathematically-defined measure beyond which we don’t have “personal presence”, like a mark on a ruler. Common sense should never be dispensed with.
 
40.png
Sherlock:
No, what I’m griping about is the attempt to define, in some objective way, what “personal presence” is… Common sense should never be dispensed with.
Common sense is fine so far as it goes. However, when I asked when does Sunday begin and end, everyone had a common sense answer. Unfortunately, the answers didn’t agree. And there was a proper canon law answer for part of it.

So I see nothing wrong in inquiring whether there is more clarity on the question in canon law, or a commentary, or some similar document. If not, then common sense and prudential judgement are all we have to go with. But if there is more detail, which I would guess is likely the case, we’ll all be the wiser.
 
40.png
Mickey:
As a Byzantine Catholic, Confession is face to face and after the confession, the priest places the epitrachial over the penitents head and says the prayer of absolution. So your phone theory is out for us! 😃
Oh, I see how you are.

Take the easy way out. 😛

Well, congratulations on your closure for this one. :clapping:

Alan
 
40.png
Sherlock:
Oh fer Pete’s sake…look, why would anyone want to mess with the sacrament as it is?
That’s right. We don’t want to mess it up. That’s why under unusual situations and especially in emergencies it can be important to know the particulars precisely. As long as you have the ability to make it to a nice church confessional, there really isn’t any application to such speculation.
Good grief, how about some common sense here? With the odd exception mandated by odd situations, “physically present” means “with the priest” as is currently practiced in the sacrament.
OK, then what does “common sense” say about the prisoner over the phone situation? What if it were prisoner by closed circuit? Do you suggest that “common sense” can either objectively determine these things, or that these situations are unimportant enough the Church and her people should not concern themselves with them?
This nit-picking reminds me of the worst of scholasticism, with endless and fruitless debates about such weighty matters as how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. Subjective and pointless discussions about just what “personally present” means will get us…where? And why?
Why not? BTW, I agree with Marilyn vos Savant that probably no angels can “dance” on the head of a pin. I think her reasoning had something to do with their being able to have physical contact with the head of the pin exerting force against them. Therefore the answer is, “none.”
Are you simply curious and like to subject details to a kind of scientific method (as if this were a chemical compound, made up of precisely measurable units) for fun,
Speaking for myself, yes. I’m an engineer. I like taking apart things that work perfectly well so I can try to figure out how they work.
or are you wanting to make confession even easier?
Now you’re getting warmer. In my own case, I was totally frantic, and the telephone was the only tool I had to contact a priest.
(Feeling humbled by having to stand in line at the confessional? Self-esteem damaged by having to submit, like everyone else, to that tedious rite? Don’t like the kneelers at your church’s confessionals?
In the experience I mentioned, I was physically locked up and unable to stand in line at the confessional. My self-esteem is beyond damaging and has actually become a source of personal amusement, so that’s not a factor. As far as kneelers, you know I never really thought about them that much. Using the kneelers can be uncomfortable for me because I have gained some weight and my stomach boinks into the pew in front and keep me front balancing my center of weight over my knees, so I have to bend them a bit. Luckily during Mass I don’t sit in the pews so I can just kneel on the floor, or stay seated and act like the Rules Don’t Apply To Me.
Now, just for you! New!! Improved!! Fast and easy confessions!!! In between business meetings? Take care of those pesky obligations the quick and easy way, with Dial-A-Priest!!)
You know, I like that. Why not? I’ve thought about writing a web site program that could automate confessions entirely, but I never thought it would be sacramental – just like a training ground for people to practice up so they can build their confidence to go make a good and proper confession.
Shzeesh…our culture is already disconnected from real, breathing human beings. We don’t need the Church to add to that.
You are right. When I personally handled the data entry of thousands of personal comments by Wichita Diocese member in the Third Synod for review by bishop Thomas Olmstead, I got some pretty good idea on what people of different parishes think they need.

Parishes far away from the city had a whole different outlook. They cannot just come to events at the spiritual life center as easily as those of us at the diocese seat. They thirst for more contact with the Church beyond just going to Mass, for which they feel lucky they have a priest at all, and wish they had more multimedia and online resources for spiritual development and participation in programs those of us in town take for granted.

Let me turn this around a bit. You first chide us that we argue at all, but then you join the argument yourself by adding your opinion that telephone options are a negative thing. You want to argue too but not be seen hanging around with us to do it. I see how you are. 😛

Let me ask you what the big deal is, if a sinner having a spiritual crisis of some sort, who lives 40 miles from the nearest live priest and has no car, calls the priest and wants absolution, then why do you not want the Church to allow that priest to handle the situation without the priest having to drive out 40 miles each way, and even then with possibly other conflicts. Why are you so against the Church being able to extend her reach by using technology?

Alan
 
40.png
Sherlock:
I’m not disputing the value of asking questions. It was asking questions that led me back to the Church, and it’s fair to say that not asking questions made it easier to leave her for as long as I did. No, what I’m griping about is the attempt to define, in some objective way, what “personal presence” is and what it is not, as if there is some concrete, mathematically-defined measure beyond which we don’t have “personal presence”, like a mark on a ruler. Common sense should never be dispensed with.
I agree with you on this sentiment. That is why we each have the Holy Spirit, in my opinion. If the Holy Spirit could only speak through the pope, then the pope had better have an incredibly error-proof set of instructions to guide Christians in every possible situation. Obviously that doesn’t work, which is why Christ came to show us that the only real, absolute law is the law of loving – which itself cannot be described by any number of written laws of any finite complexity.

Alan
 
If you look at Holy Scriptures especially to the story of Peter and the invitation from Jesus to walk with him on the water, we can get some appreciation of the intimacy of the Sacraments.

***And in the fourth watch of the night, he came to them walking upon the sea. ******26 And they seeing him walk upon the sea, were troubled, saying: It is an apparition. And they cried out for fear. 27 And immediately Jesus spoke to them, saying: Be of good heart: it is I, fear ye not. 28 And Peter making answer, said: Lord, if it be thou, bid me come to thee upon the waters. 29 And he said: Come. And Peter going down out of the boat, walked upon the water to come to Jesus. 30 But seeing the wind strong, he was afraid: and when he began to sink, he cried out, saying: Lord, save me. 31 And immediately Jesus stretching forth his hand took hold of him, and said to him: O thou of little faith, why didst thou doubt? 32 And when they were come up into the boat, the wind ceased. 33 And they that were in the boat came and adored him, saying: Indeed thou art the Son of God. 34 ***

Notice how Jesus saves Peter here. He could have willed it. He could have called on angels to lift peter to safety, but no. When jesus heard Peter call out to Him, immediately jesus stretched forth his hand and took hold of him.

So it is for us in the Sacraments. We need to be physically present so that we too can experience Jesus reaching out to us through the person of the Priest. Not only do we need to be present, we should be very moved to make sure we are physically present.
 
40.png
AlanFromWichita:
I agree with you on this sentiment. That is why we each have the Holy Spirit, in my opinion. If the Holy Spirit could only speak through the pope, then the pope had better have an incredibly error-proof set of instructions to guide Christians in every possible situation. Obviously that doesn’t work, which is why Christ came to show us that the only real, absolute law is the law of loving – which itself cannot be described by any number of written laws of any finite complexity.

Alan
If we all have the Holy Spirit, then there is no such thing as objective truth, since different people will claim that the Holy Spirit is guiding them to different and contradictory truths. Since truth is, ultimately, a Somebody, then if there is no objective truth there is no God.

As for your comment "If the Holy Spirit could only speak through the pope… "—Catholic doctrine does not hold that the Holy Spirit can only speak through the pope. You have, unfortunately, some misconceptions about the papacy.

As for “Christ came to show us that the only real, absolute law is the law of loving – which itself cannot be described by any number of written laws of any finite complexity”, that seems to me to be an overly strong claim (“the only real, absolute law”?!) made for a concept that is too vague and open to distortion—what if my personal interpretation of this “law of love” means that abortion is OK, because real love doesn’t inconvenience anyone with an unwanted pregnancy?

We’re straying off-topic anyway…
 
Code of Canon Law:
Can.* 964

§1. The proper place to hear sacramental confessions is a church or oratory.

§2. The conference of bishops is to establish norms regarding the confessional; it is to take care, however, that there are always confessionals with a fixed grate between the penitent and the confessor in an open place so that the faithful who wish to can use them freely.

§3. Confessions are not to be heard outside a confessional without a just cause.
Dosen’t say anything more.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top