T
Thomasbradley312
Guest
Why are Catholic Bibles smaller than the Orthodox churches?
Then the “smaller” Protestant Bible must come in a “bigger” package than Catholic Bibles.Big things come in small packages.
But that doesn’t answer the question in the OP.Because Holy Mother Church, responding to Protestant heresies, definitively affirmed the Canon of scriptures provided at ancient Church synods/councils in Hippo and Carthage.
The Septuagint was a collection of books in Greek not the canon of scripture in itself.Don’t we use the Septuagint? Shouldn’t our Old Testament look like this then?(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
Not to define the canon, no. But then again, you have already been told this hard teaching.Don’t we use the Septuagint?
Its just easier hide from history.Will no one read Where We Got The Bible by Rev. Henry Graham?
I note a pattern of posters staring at the ditch rather than the road. “Well, so and so says the Catholic Church is wrong on this or that…”Its just easier hide from history.
Peace!!!
To my knowledge, they do notI believe the Slavs and the Greeks vary a little.
This is true that Trent “defined” the canon. Even after Florence some of the Deuteros were questioned like Sirach. If anything, the Reformers pushed the Catholic Church to officially define it definitely. Where Protestantism plays in this discussion is that the OT had been defined before Jesus, because He held the Jews - specifically the Pharisees - accountable for knowing what the OT canon was, which was the same canon as later Protestants:The early Church didn’t have a single definitive canon, so different local Churches went different ways. In fact, it wasn’t until the Council of Trent in the 16th century that the Catholic Church definitively settles the matter, using the canon that had been accepted in Rome as the baseline.
This is not entirely true. Baruch and the epistle of Jeremiah were NOT in the fourth and fifth century church councils. Neither were they in Jeromes’s Vulgate. They got added four hundred years later. 1 and 2 Esdras were not the same as Ezra and Nehemiah. They were more like Ezra-Nehemiah as one book, and 3 Esdras was the other, which is not the same as what we find at Trent, which were Ezra as one book and Nehemiah as another.Because our canon is the canon that was accepted by the universal Church in the late fourth-early fifth centuries (then reaffirmed at the Council of Trent in response to the Protestant Revolt).