G
Gricken
Guest
-mindmeld-
-mindmeld-
Are you OK Sister Terese, you seem in quite a fuddle. I am not an atheist. I appreciate that you feel it can go around in circles I feel it to. But that is the nature of my questions. I find that a lot of people in the Church, hide behind dogma or doctrine and don’t seem to be able to look at their God and religion in an objective way, to ascertain what the truths are. I always get the ’ It is true because it is’ argument or frustration from those who reply because they obviously have blind faith - I don’t - I need evidence and not philosophical suppositions or the ‘I don’t know the answer - so it must be a god’ thinking of Thomas Aquinas et al.If you search all of her/his posts, you will see that these questions are recurring recycle of the same topic: atheism. She/he does not discuss any other topic. Why? Because she/he has an agenda. She/he has absolutely no interest in real debate. She/he has a serious problem with God, the Catholic Church, and anyone who believes in God and the Church. Anyone who spends time in answering these ridiculous questions are met with more of the same. It is a vicious cycle–an atheist’s merry-go-round. I got off a long time ago.
Very revealing…and exactly what I suspected.
You truly are ignorant to make such a ridiculous statement.Proof in a religious sense appears to be of a much lower standard, than say law or science
If you think the arguments of Thomas Aquinas boil down to “I don’t know the answer - so it must be a god” Then you SERIOUSLY misunderstand him.Are you OK Sister Terese, you seem in quite a fuddle. I am not an atheist. I appreciate that you feel it can go around in circles I feel it to. But that is the nature of my questions. I find that a lot of people in the Church, hide behind dogma or doctrine and don’t seem to be able to look at their God and religion in an objective way, to ascertain what the truths are. I always get the ’ It is true because it is’ argument or frustration from those who reply because they obviously have blind faith - I don’t - I need evidence and not philosophical suppositions or the ‘I don’t know the answer - so it must be a god’ thinking of Thomas Aquinas et al.
I’ve already addressed your blind faith argument april; don’t make me do it again.Are you OK Sister Terese, you seem in quite a fuddle. I am not an atheist. I appreciate that you feel it can go around in circles I feel it to. But that is the nature of my questions. I find that a lot of people in the Church, hide behind dogma or doctrine and don’t seem to be able to look at their God and religion in an objective way, to ascertain what the truths are. I always get the ’ It is true because it is’ argument or frustration from those who reply because they obviously have blind faith - I don’t - I need evidence and not philosophical suppositions or the ‘I don’t know the answer - so it must be a god’ thinking of Thomas Aquinas et al.
EXCELLENT point!!!Does that qualify as a religious proof, or a law or scientific proof?
Now that sentence makes absolutely no sense at all. Why don’t you try English??Er, no. If we don’t know something better to admit that than use the default ‘insert a god’
OMGosh!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! :banghead:With all due respect, that is evasive. You are avoiding the point. Sitting a maths test the onus is on you. Suggesting a god created the universe the onus is on you
I find when I ask questions people, obfuscate, misdirect or dance around the question. It is as if they can’t handle free thinking or simple questions and rather than say ’ I don’ know’ or the ‘Church does not have an answer to that’ - they go to great lengths to insist that what the church teaches is somehow infallible or not open to test or scrutiny - and cannot be wrong. In no other branch of human endeavour would I meet such obstinacy.Well, your claims are groundless because you ask the same questions over and over again. You are HAPPY to provoke the good people here. Bottom line.
Am I the only one who read that as “U mad bro?”Are you OK Sister Terese, you seem in quite a fuddle.
I do not do that. You do it all the time. Hypocrisy!I find when I ask questions people, obfuscate, misdirect or dance around the question. It is as if they can’t handle free thinking or simple questions and rather than say ’ I don’ know’ or the ‘Church does not have an answer to that’ - they go to great lengths to insist that what the church teaches is somehow infallible or not open to test or scrutiny - and cannot be wrong. In no other branch of human endeavour would I meet such obstinacy.
That’s a good proof for God. The fact that belief in God has survived all these millenia must mean there’s something to it.When I think of man’s progress in the last 150 years. It is hard to imagine how this type of thinking can survive. The church will have to grow via the third world countries. As they are in danger of being nothing more than an anachronism by the civilised world.
Well that’s an evasive dodge if I ever read one!!Exactly. That is point. The catholic church claims it’s god I’d THE god. So the burden of proof is on them.
This right here tells me all I need to know. You believe that since people have believed in many God’s throughout history, then the claim that there is only one God must be false.I think my favourite is the disingenuous * ‘There is only one God’*
I know that the person typing could easily name about a dozen gods without even trying, off the top of their head.
.
You mean like you do???I am saying that is accepted that one cannot prove or disprove a god.
I can’t help you. I watched Craig on many videos and debates and he talks a lot about proof, but just repeats himself and never actually gets around to the proof bit
Ahhhh…the truth is revealed! “We will not believe!”Of course not. I would rather we found out than just believe.
Lie.I am neither, I am just curious.
I agree, it is an interesting phenomena - that man has created gods all through history - but all we can tell is that they are ‘man made’. Maybe there is something in the ‘God gene’ hypothesis. Some people do have this propensity - to believe in Gods. It is noteworthy, that which ever religion you have a conversation with - they all believe theirs is - the true one.I do not do that. You do it all the time. Hypocrisy!
That’s a good proof for God. The fact that belief in God has survived all these millenia must mean there’s something to it.
ST I am not providing the answers I am looking for them.You mean like you do???
So instead of thinking “I must figure out which one is correct” you decide “all of them are false”I agree, it is an interesting phenomena - that man has created gods all through history - but all we can tell is that they are ‘man made’. Maybe there is something in the ‘God gene’ hypothesis. Some people do have this propensity - to believe in Gods. It is noteworthy, that which ever religion you have a conversation with - they all believe theirs is - the true one.