C
CopticChristian
Guest
You are not disagreeing with me. You are disagreeing with the problem that “christians” have as defined in the OP, not including Catholic Christians. The Protestant dilema is that they believe that translations are filled with error and they are. The question for them is which translation to trust and on whose authority they are true. Catholics read all sorts of Scripture as defined by the Church. No problem for me and you. The Church has recognized Scripture.I completely agree that we need an infallible authority to guide us through the scriptures. The divine inspiration of scripture guaranties its truth, not its interpretation. I disagree, however, with your premise that the translations we have today cannot be trusted.
The New Testament, in the form in which it exists today, is the most relaible text that we have from ancient times. We have a great number of ancient manuscript copies, some of them which are very close to the dates the originals were composed. Mark Shea and Dr. Edward Sri, authors of “The DaVinci Deception” point out that when compared with other ancient texts, which are readily accepted by the world as authentic and accurate, the Bible stands out as the most reliable and authentic. For instance, The Illiad was written by Homer around 800 B.C. but we have no original manuscript. Todays editions are base upon manuscripts that date long after Homer lived. There are approximately 650 extant manuscripts which date around 200-300 A.D., almost 1000 years after Homer died. Yet most scholars recognize them as accurate representations.
We have over 5,000 manuscript copies of the New Testament, compared with around 650 copies of The Illiad. These copies are also much closer in date to the originals than that of The Iliad, with some of these copies dating to within just a few decades of the original compositions. This principle holds true for other ancient writers such as Plato and Aristotle which are held to reliable by todays scholars.
In addition, if this is God’s word, we can be certain that he will protect his word, which he did by entrusting it to his Church who has preserved and guarded it throughout the centuries. We cannot forget that this is a divine work. It is also a Catholic work, written for Catholics by Catholics. Who better to authenticate its relaibility than the Catholic Church itself.
archive.catholic.com/thisrock/1999/9903clas.asp
WHERE ARE THE ORIGINAL SCRIPTURES?
By HENRY G. GRAHAM
Protestants have history and tradition however as always revised history and fallible tradition of men.But we know from history and tradition that these were the books they wrote, and they have been handed down to us in a most wonderful way. What we have now is the printed Bible; but before the invention of printing in 1450, the Bible existed only in handwriting—what we call manuscript—and we have in our possession now copies of the Bible in manuscript that were made as early as the fourth century. These copies, which you can see with your own eyes today, contain the books that the Catholic Bible contains today. That is how we know we are right in receiving these books as Scripture, as genuinely the work of the apostles and evangelists.![]()