L
Larowyn
Guest
Then why did you just now post?
You are… disgusting.Boys! Enough already!
I think we can all put our penises back in our pants now. They’re both the same size, so you can stop getting your panties in a bunch
Why thank you. I aim to please.You are… disgusting.
Well, at least it caught people off guard and dimished the posts to a single sentence.Why thank you. I aim to please.
I was done posting here until he volunteered that disgusting and nauseatingly graphic mental image.Well, at least it caught people off guard and dimished the posts to a single sentence.
Until she did.I was done posting here until he volunteered that disgusting and nauseatingly graphic mental image.
Not surprising.I was done posting here until he volunteered that disgusting and nauseatingly graphic mental image.
Absolutely. I also firmly believe it’s no one’s business who I have a coffee with. I believe if something isn’t decidedly romantic, it shouldn’t be exclusive. I only have a problem - but in turn a big one - with non-exclusive romance, defined period relationships and the like.I agree. When my mom was young, a girl could go to a movie w/ one guy on Friday and bowling w/ another on Saturday. No big deal.
Depends what you do when you go out. If you sit there and talk or walk or bowl or dance or play pool or whatever, it’s stupid to think it’s any reason to make it exclusive. Now if there’s something romantic, like kissing, holding hands, exchanging love letters, excessive flirting, any implication of love or a romantic relationship, that should be exclusive.I have been trying to explain to my 17 yr old why there is nothing wrong with doing the same thing. Just because you go out w/ someone once, does not mean you’re exclusive. (when my dd was telling a co-worker about this practice, the girl said, “Your mom wants you to be a slut??”)
Exactly. It’s objectifying. I see nothing wrong in having a coffee or two just for the talk and the company - or even going to a dance and behaving like a lady and a gentleman - even if nothing is going to come out of that. But romantic relationships should not be had for fun. Free enjoyment stops at the friendship level.I think dating to have fun and then breaking up when you’re bored is not the way to treat people.
I would definitely not date a non-exclusive kisser, but if it’s just spending time together, it’s pretty much free game. Obviously things work both ways, so whatever she can do, I can.It is hard to find a guy who would even be open to only going on one date (unless it’s just a “hook up”) and would not want a second one if he knew you were with a different guy the next night.
Neither do non-exclusive relationship (sharing a coffee isn’t a relationship).
- It teaches people how to break up. With each subsequent failed relationship, each party learns to be a little more careful and reserved in order to protect him/herself from future hurt. It does nothing to model or prepare one for a lifetime committment.
Untrue. Also, non-exclusive dating leads to a feeling that monogamy is fine so long as sex is not had. I would also like to see some statistics, if any existed, to check “failure to temptation” ratio between people who are in non-exclusive relationships (I mean full-blown, kissing and the like) and those who are in exclusive relationships when it comes to such things.
- Exclusive dating can (and almost always does) lead to a feeling that sex is inevitable.
Dating just works out better for other peopleI’d still like to hear an actual definition of “courting” as opposed to “dating.” So far it appears that “courting” is the practice of taking your family with you on dates(?!)
If that’s the case, then I’m really glad I dated DH instead of “courting” him, because if I’d had to take my family with us on dates, I’d still be single!
I know what would have happened. My father would have talked interminably on about football and baseball statistics. When my dad was up getting another beer, my mother would have introduced the topic of how much housework she had to do and how my older sister and I never helped, whereupon she would have gotten into a big old bickering match with my older sister. My brother would have found the whole thing totally boring and read a book the entire time. My three younger sisters would have run around screaming and fighting over the same toy.
Real romantic, innit. Don’t you all find yourselves longing to marry me after a date with the above folks?
No offense to the courtship advocates, but dating worked just fine for me.
Yeah courting definately wouldn;t have worked with my parents either…especiallty my mom I think. Course my husband and I didn;t really date either I mean we kinda did but not in the conventional sense. It;s a long story lol.I’d still like to hear an actual definition of “courting” as opposed to “dating.” So far it appears that “courting” is the practice of taking your family with you on dates(?!)
If that’s the case, then I’m really glad I dated DH instead of “courting” him, because if I’d had to take my family with us on dates, I’d still be single!
I know what would have happened. My father would have talked interminably on about football and baseball statistics. When my dad was up getting another beer, my mother would have introduced the topic of how much housework she had to do and how my older sister and I never helped, whereupon she would have gotten into a big old bickering match with my older sister. My brother would have found the whole thing totally boring and read a book the entire time. My three younger sisters would have run around screaming and fighting over the same toy.
Real romantic, innit. Don’t you all find yourselves longing to marry me now?
No offense to the courtship advocates, but dating worked just fine for me.