Why December 25?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RGCheek
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

RGCheek

Guest
catholic.com/blog/jon-sorensen/why-december-25
It’s that time of year again when many Christians encounter claims that pagan deities predating Jesus Christ were born on December 25. In popular films, Internet videos, and other media you can find long lists of gods who were supposedly born on the same day.
This idea is not limited to unbelievers. I have heard many Christians claim that the date of Christmas was intended to provide an alternative to pagan celebrations. In some ways it has become a pious legend. On the other hand, some Fundamentalist denominations refuse to celebrate Christmas for this reason.
Of all the deities of whom people make this claim, only three can be found to come close: Saturn, Sol Invictus (Unconquered Sun), and Mithras. …
Although the date of Christ’s birth is not given to us in Scripture, there is documented evidence that December 25 was already of some significance to Christians prior to A.D. 354. One example can be found in the writings of Hyppolytus of Rome, who explains in his Commentary on the book of Daniel (c. A.D. 204) that the Lord’s birth was believed to have occurred on that day:…
In addition, the census was a time that Romans taxed people, based on wealth at the time of the census, so they timed it to coincide with the harvesting and selling of large cash crops. For ancient Palestine that is olives, and it is harvested in late November, and as the Holy Family got there late, this would put it into December.
 
The claims that many gods were born on dec. 25th is sometimes speculation. Including Jesus, because nowhere we read this. It was the Church who defined a date for the. celebration. Now, it is true it is a very ancient tradition.
Not because it is late in the year, or winter, makes it impossible for a baby to be born in these conditions. Nor it confirms that the date was with no doubt borrowed from paganism.

In fact, the actual date matters for history only. It is true that as a symbol of the coming of light, it is very powerful. But if we take the example of Sol invictus, about the time of winter solstice, there is little evidence that the celebration predates christianity. the same for Mithra’s festivities.

But if we were able to show that Christmas was intended to replace these old feasts, it would perfectly make sense, too. The real Sun, the real Light, the one true Lord and God is Jesus Christ.
Therefore, in the way Peter in Acts gives some instructions to pagans converts without taking away all their traditions, we can see it as a way of celebrating truth without hurting feelings. We replace the meaning of the feast, not the time of the year, so that the habits remain the same.
 
About the quote from Hippolytus: the actual manuscripts differ here. While most manuscripts of Hippolytus do say that it was “eighth day before the kalends of January” (= December 25th), there are two alternative readings: one does not specify the day, the other reads instead “on the fourth day before the … of April.”

The thing is, the ‘April’ reading fits more with another Hippolytus-related data we have. In 1551, a marble statue of a seated male figure was discovered in the cemetery of the Via Tiburtina in Rome (where Hippolytus was buried). On the sides of the seat was carved a table for the calculation of the date of Easter, and on the back the titles of works written by Hippolytus. Guess what? On the cycle of Easter dates, there is one item that stands out: “the fourth day before the Nones of April,” against which is the notation, “birth of Christ.”

The statue and the variant reading the Commentary on Daniel would thus have Hippolytus (or if the April reading on the Commentary is an interpolation as well, someone else who knew a tradition similar to that reflected on the Easter table on the statue) believe that Jesus was born on the fourth day, before the Nones of April (in this case, April 5th); in other words, Jesus is said to be born on a Wednesday, April 2nd (counting inclusively). The April 2nd date is given as one of the possible dates for Passover/Easter; it might show that Hippolytus or whoever wrote it had the idea of Jesus being born on the Passover (April 2nd) of 2 BC. (Hippolytus did opine that Jesus was born on the 42nd year of Augustus’ reign, 5,502 years after Adam = 3/2 BC.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top